AKP健食天

Balan Jalal 巴兰·贾拉尔

Dr. Balan Jalal(巴兰·贾拉尔博士) 与Jordan Peterson(乔丹·彼得森)的讨论,涵盖神经科学、梦境、睡眠瘫痪、脑的可塑性、文化影响等


巴兰·贾拉尔博士首先提到,大脑是可塑的、动态的,而不是固定的。顶叶及其上顶叶(superior parietal lobule)在构建主观自我感中起关键作用,这种自我感让人感觉自己占据了这个身体,而不是别人的身体。随后提到荣格(Jung)的理论,认为梦境是探索异常、重新映射的场所。

他回忆自己早年学习生物心理学时,因大量术语而感到无聊,因此在教学中注重功能和整体背景的叙述。他认为,了解大脑区域与功能的关系不仅有趣,还能为哲学思考提供限制条件,使概念性的命题更加合理。他喜欢通过叙事和故事将知识点自然展开,而不是以枯燥的ABC方式呈现。


大脑的动态性与研究方法

贾拉尔博士提到,结合自己的研究,例如强迫症(OCD)和帕金森病的相关实验,通过这些实例自然融入神经科学课程。他以轨道额皮质(orbital frontal cortex)在OCD中的过度活跃为例,探讨其功能,又以基底节(basal ganglia)与帕金森病的关系引入有趣的实验。他认为每个人研究大脑的方式不同,就像探索一个大陆,他的方法受导师V.S. Ramachandran(拉马钱德兰)的启发。

他回忆自己在2010-2011年于加州大学本科时期选修了拉马钱德兰的课程,最终成为其实验室的研究学者。他与拉马钱德兰建立了深厚友谊,常一起在海滩散步,深受其大脑整体观的影响。贾拉尔博士采用拉马钱德兰的方法,认为大脑是高度可塑的,其模块功能动态且灵活。他将大脑视为一个流动的过程,而非固定实体。


实验与大脑可塑性

贾拉尔博士通过实验阐述了他对大脑的看法,例如“橡胶手错觉”(rubber hand illusion)。他描述实验过程:被试者将一只手藏在桌子下,实验者同时抚摸被试的隐蔽手和桌上的橡胶手(或桌子),同步进行两分钟后,被试会感到触觉从橡胶手或桌子上传来,大脑的体感区域也会被激活。这展示了人类将感觉映射到身体及工具上的能力,例如用螺丝刀或开车时扩展身体感知。若用锤子威胁橡胶手,被试会感到疼痛,大脑的疼痛区域会被激活,表明外部物体可被“具身化”(embodied)为身体的一部分。

这种现象与社会感知相关,例如共情能力强的个体对他人疼痛的感知更敏感。这种能力让人通过观察他人目标(例如眼神)模拟对方的感知和情绪,从而理解他人。他提到自己团队首次证明,OCD患者因自我感固定(如反复洗手),对橡胶手错觉更敏感。在同步条件下,他们体验更强,而随机条件下(无同步抚摸),错觉较弱或不存在。他澄清实验细节:被试一手隐藏,实验者同步刺激隐手和可见物体(如橡胶手或桌子),使被试将后者视为自身的一部分。他与同事Rich McNally甚至在空气中进行实验,让被试感到手“漂浮”,显示这种具身感可延伸至抽象空间。

这种现象与“拥有感”(ownership)密切相关,例如人对车被攻击的反应类似身体受袭,表明大脑可将无生命物体纳入自我认同。他强调大脑可塑性不仅体现在结构变化,还在于功能模块的动态性。例如,颞顶交界处(TPJ,temporoparietal junction)整合触觉、听觉等感官信息,构建整体感知,参与自我-他者区分。若此区域受损,自我界限可能模糊。他提到,TPJ与额叶相连,涉及共情和心理理论(theory of mind),如猜测他人的意图,这也与精神病态(缺乏共情)的研究有关。


忽视症与身体意象

提到拉马钱德兰对忽视症(neglect)的实验。他描述,若右侧顶叶受损(如中风),患者会失去对左侧身体及左侧空间的感知,甚至无法想象“左”的概念。患者可能认为左臂不属于自己,试图扔掉,或画钟时只画右侧一半,将数字挤在右边。顶叶负责空间定位,包括身体和环境的布局,这种丧失难以理解。

上顶叶(superior parietal lobule)与 颞顶交界处TPJ协作,构建身体意象和主观自我感。若受损,患者可能否认瘫痪(失认症,anosognosia),坚称手臂能动,尽管无法做到。这可能是因中风前身体表征未更新,相关脑区受损后无法修正。他回忆拉马钱德兰的灌水实验:向忽视症患者的左耳注入冷水,扰动前庭系统,短暂恢复对左侧的感知,患者会因意识到瘫痪而情绪崩溃,但效果消退后又恢复否认。他推测,右侧顶叶与自我表征有关,而左侧中风无此效应,显示大脑功能的侧化。


脑侧化与情绪

左右半球功能不同。若左侧前额叶受损,患者可能对任何事产生灾难性反应(如无故哭泣);右侧受损则可能变得妄想性乐观(如不切实际购物),显示左侧与积极情绪、右侧与消极情绪相关。他提到经颅磁刺激(TMS)可激活左侧半球,减轻抑郁,证明了这种侧化。他认同Alkonen Goldberg的模型,认为右侧半球处理新奇事物,左侧处理常规化。

右半球检测异常,引发消极情绪,因新奇意味着当前模式失效。抑郁者对异常反应过度,从小错误跳跃到灾难性结论,而健康者需多次重复才会深入分析,显示左侧前额叶可能限制这种无限探索。右半球打开可能性空间,左侧提供锚定,避免失控。


梦境的功能

讨论了荣格关于梦境的假设,认为梦是安全探索异常的场所。他推测,右侧半球检测异常后,利用幻想(模拟)探索,整合多个异常后产生洞察。梦境(尤其是REM睡眠)充满情感更新,常见社会场景,因右侧半球擅长解码面部表情。

REM睡眠的生理特征:体瘫(由脑桥和延髓控制),眼睑除外;边缘系统(情感中心)高度活跃,前额叶(抑制中心)活动减少,导致逻辑性降低。他举例,REM睡眠中“太阳”可能联想到“椅子”而非“月亮”,显示探索性思维。去甲肾上腺素(逻辑思维相关)在REM期间减少,由蓝斑核(locus coeruleus)控制,使思维发散、创造性增强。前庭系统和运动区虽活跃但被瘫痪,造成梦中跑不动或被追的体验。

这种状态适合极端模拟,焦虑是最常见情绪,因其暂停当前操作,启动探索。梦中社会互动多为负面,可能训练生存能力,如应对威胁。


梦境与生存

梦境模拟负面场景(如与连环杀手对抗)可增强现实中的生存能力。他分享个人经历:在蒙特利尔与一位粗犷的房东(前地狱天使成员)相处,学会通过社交感知应对潜在危险,如拒绝其深夜卖物请求。梦境聚焦未解的社会问题,探索恶意景观,提升应对能力。

梦境呈现场景直至引发情感反应(多偏负面,因人类对负面的天然倾向),多巴胺也参与其中,如下顶叶(inferior parietal lobule)或中脑边缘系统受损会停止梦境。负面情绪提示适应薄弱,梦境围绕此探索。


梦境的诗意与神秘性

胼胝体连接左右半球,若切断则产生双重意识。梦境偏右半球主导,呈现视觉隐喻,无法用语言描述,类似艺术体验。白天左半球运行命题化常规,右侧记录失败;夜间右半球探索未适应领域。梦扩展联想网络,重新映射更有效的感知。

梦境的神秘感可能与迷幻体验重叠,因REM睡眠中去甲肾上腺素和血清素减少,血清素2A受体被激活,与服用迷幻剂(如psilocybin)类似,带来不可言喻的个人意义。他观察到,人们常分享梦境,因其具有高度个人化的宇宙感。


睡眠瘫痪与文化影响

梦境可弥合个人与宇宙的差距,如面对反复被追的梦,他建议患者想象转向怪物提问,改变猎物身份,常使梦消失。他解释,梦中怪物的强度来自活跃的杏仁核和海马,记忆为情绪赋予形象。他介绍睡眠瘫痪:REM瘫痪延续至半醒状态,40%的人看到怪物。

他分享个人经历:青少年时在哥本哈根醒来体瘫,感到角落有怪物靠近并扼喉;另一次在埃及看到卡扎菲悬浮攻击,受阿拉伯新闻影响。研究显示文化叙事(如巫师、外星人)塑造怪物形象,如埃及的恶魔、意大利的巨猫、美国的绑架。恐惧最初表现为模糊形状(V1视觉皮层反应),随视觉层次上升具象化(如弗雷迪·克鲁格),未知形态最恐怖。

他提出行为疗法:通过视觉层次赋予恐惧形态,再制定策略(如变敌为友),减轻威胁。文化强化恐惧,如埃及和意大利因恐怖叙事使体瘫更频繁、更可怕,丹麦则因理性解释较轻微。他举例,若祖母灌输怪物故事,孩子初次体瘫后因焦虑反复发作,形成传染性迷因。他引用Rich McNally的研究,外星绑架者听自己叙述时的生理反应堪比战争PTSD。


治疗睡眠瘫痪

贾拉尔博士开发了四步疗法:1)认知重评(视为大脑现象而非怪物);2)情感疏远(因普遍性无需恐惧);3)专注积极意象(如母亲或神);4)冥想接受(不抗拒症状)。试点研究显示瘫痪减少50%,需进一步验证。


先知梦与宗教

贾拉尔博士认为,接受恶意的练习(如耶稣受难路)是应对怪物的元策略。他询问彼得森对先知梦的看法,提到约瑟的梦启发了他。他提到,宗教作为应对恶意的元策略,深入探讨恶的本質时,语言自然带宗教色彩。介绍颞叶癫痫患者因情感区过度活跃,视万物为诗意、神圣,如陀思妥耶夫斯基。


异常感知与现实感

贾拉尔博士提到Cotard综合征(一切皆死)和Fregoli综合征(万物似熟人),显示情感区异常如何扭曲现实。他认为,偏执型精神分裂症因情感过度赋予电视话语意义,构建阴谋论,梦境般的超现实感源于此。他总结,意义的强弱决定现实感,超现实或死寂取决于情感赋予。


Edit:2025.03.28

00:00

So we look at the brain as something that's malleable and not fixed. It's a dynamic object. So the parietal lobes and the superior parietal lobule is specifically involved in creating a subjective sense of a self. The feeling that I occupy this body and not somebody else's body, right?

00:14

Jung's idea was that the dream was a place of exploration for the remapping of anomaly. This is very weird too, everyone. So you have this REM paralysis, obviously. You're paralyzed from head to toe during REM sleep. You're dreaming away. Are you familiar with sleep paralysis? Something was happening to me and I was frozen and unable to speak. And I knew I had to wake myself up. Like I tried to throw myself off the bed. Sometimes I could yell to my wife. She'd have to come and shake me and then I'd wake up. So I was sleeping in my room and then I had this…

00:43

creepy feeling of a monster from the corner of my room approaching me until it was on my chest strangling me. What did the monster look like? Well, I'll tell you. Okay. … … …

01:07

Hi, everybody. I had the opportunity today to speak to Dr. Balan Jalal. He's a neuroscientist and author at Harvard and previously a visiting researcher at Cambridge University Medical School.

01:20

He's been featured in the New York Times, the Washington Post and other such publications. The Telegraph and the BBC described him as “one of the world's leading experts on sleep paralysis and the terrors and opportunities of dream, fantasy and adaptation that accompany that condition.” What did we discuss?

01:39

Dr. Jalal's Intro to Neuroscience course at Peterson Academy. The relationship between neuroanatomy, brain function, perception, emotion and behavior, the function of the dream state, the role of culture and conception in dealing with emotion, particularly fear, and the changing landscape of the modern university. It's quite a trip. Join us.

02:04

Well, thanks for coming in. Well, thank you, Jordan. Dr. Peterson, I'd love to be here. Let's talk about Peterson Academy first. We just released a course of yours, Introduction to Neuroscience. Right, right. So I'd like to know, I think it would be useful to talk a little bit about the course, but I'd also like to know about your experience doing the filming and your reflections on the process and the project itself. Yeah, yeah.

02:31

Well, first of all, it was a lovely process. Let me start there. So I flew in to Miami. Great reception overall. Nice people around. Ben, Nancy, Vincent, everybody on the team, lovely. The shooting was great.

02:50

So yeah, top professional, really like that. And then the course itself, it's an eight-hour course on the brain and sort of going through, initially starting from sort of the basics of the brain, the different structures of the brain, then going all the way to sort of higher abstract things like human nature and sort of the nature of how art emanates in the brain and things like that. So it's kind of,

03:17

it kind of has the nitty gritty of an introductory neuroscience course, but then also taking in some more sort of poetic aspects of the brain. So it's kind of all that mixed. Right, so it's an approach to the cultural from the bottom up, from the biological up.

03:32

Right, right. How much anatomy, functional anatomy and so forth is in the course? I make sure that the basics are there. So for a basics neuroscience course, as an introduction, you've got to have the basics there, all the brain structures, the cortex, the brainstem, all the different names. But I try to keep it simple so people don't fall asleep. When I did my first biopsychology neuroscience course, that was…

03:56

incredibly boring. I had all these names thrown at me. - Yeah, and you just had to force memorize them. - It made no sense, right? So what's the cerebellum doing? What's this doing? You just had all these names, you had to memorize them and that was it.

04:09

But I really make sure to describe the function and have an overall context for each. Yeah, I found that I got extremely interested in neuroanatomy, even at a detailed level, when I was reading scientists who associated the area with the function. It's very important. Yeah, well, it was also extremely useful philosophically. One of the advantages, if you're a conceptual thinker,

04:36

to studying neuroanatomy and neurobiology is that it puts limits on what philosophical propositions are plausible and possible. Right. I really like that. So it, it, it, it, like, it's, it's like you have to play a game with two different sets of rules then, right? It has to make sense conceptually. So that would be philosophically, but then it can't

05:00

violate the principles of neuroanatomy and neuroscience that are already established. It's a very good way of initial triangulation. Yeah, the way that I like to do is that I know that in this course I'll cover this, right? But then I kind of see and explore how I can sort of weave this into sort of a narrative and a story and then kind of put things in as we go along. And I feel like this makes sense to put this aspect here and put that aspect here so it doesn't come in this sort of

05:28

uh, you know, very, uh, ABC kind of dry way. So that's my approach and see how I can let things unfold, uh, in a natural way. And so you said that when you went to do the recording, that the process worked well, what about it worked well? I was very impressed. So I was very impressed by the whole, the whole process, the way, um, things were arranged. Uh, obviously we were put in a very nice hotel. Um,

05:53

And we felt pampered, honestly. Good. You feel pampered. You feel everything is just on point. And yeah, and then the shooting itself, people around you, they take care of you, bring you food. You know, it's just very, you feel pampered. So it's great. Yeah, well, you know, I think we realized the importance of that, really, because

06:17

When I did the first Exodus seminar for The Daily Wire, we brought nine thinkers in, and we spent a fair bit of time on the hospitality side. And one of the things I realized, and I knew this in part from working at a university, was that a lot of the professors that we pulled in for that seminar, I wouldn't say they're exactly well treated at their institutions. And that's foolish, because…

06:48

I invited the people who I did invite to the Exodus seminar because I thought they were great and I wanted to hear what they had to say. And there's every reason to make that obvious in every way.

07:04

in every detail of treatment. And so, you know, one of the things I offer people who we offer at Peterson Academy, people who come and lecture, because people ask me, well, you know, what lecture do you need? And that's not the right approach. My sense is that I find people whose views I want to

07:24

know and share and then I want them to do what they think would be best because I wouldn't bloody well invite them if I didn't think they knew what they were doing. And I don't want to put constraints on them. And then if we find the right people, we can sort out the curriculum rather than

07:40

sorting out their curriculum and then forcing the participants, the professors into it. That makes no sense at all to me. Absolutely. And that was my approach too, right? So I would talk about my own research, some of the nicest experiments that I love about my work and sort of weave into that neuroscience curriculum in that way, right? So we talk about, for example, OCD and then maybe you might mention the orbital frontal cortex, which is overactive in OCD. What's the function of the orbital frontal cortex? This

08:07

the structure in the brain or the striatum and the basal ganglia in the context of Parkinson's. But again, taking in some work that's very, you know, some experiments that are fascinating. So it's kind of taking that natural approach, that sort of my own research or works of colleagues and just weaving it in in a more natural way, I think. Okay, so I'm curious, everybody who studies the brain

08:36

in some depth has their own approach. It's like exploring a continent, let's say. They have their own approach. And so when you lay out the architecture of the brain, let's say, the basic anatomy, tell me how you do that. I would like to hear how you conceptualize the brain. So…

08:55

So do that if you would. Yeah, absolutely. So for me, I think the way that I, my view of the brain was inspired by my mentor, V.S. Ramachandran. Oh yeah, right. You worked with, yeah. He's a stunningly effective public speaker. He's extremely stunningly effective, charismatic. And when I went to California in my early days as an undergraduate, I ended up in his course. So I took his course.

09:19

So let me take you there. When was that? That was in 2010, 11, around 11, maybe 2011. So I started there, became a research scholar in his lab eventually. And I think…

09:32

you know, becoming very good friends with him, uh, ending up in his laboratory, going on, you know, long, long walks on the beach all the time and, and just spending time with him and getting his view on the brain and sort of adapting that as my own view was, was, uh, was something that, um, you know, um,

09:49

influenced me. And his approach, obviously, and the approach that I've adopted is one where you sort of look at the brain holistically. You acknowledge that the brain is hyperplastic. So there's all these modules that are highly dynamic and the brain is extremely malleable. And so we look at the brain as something that extremely, as a fluid process that's malleable and not fixed.

10:10

as said in its own ways, it has this fluidity to it. So that's kind of my view of the brain overall, that it's a dynamic object.

10:23

But beyond that, let me also explain some of our experiments. So the way that we approach science and probing the human brain is through experiments where we look at conceptual experiments in neuroscience. So for example, there's the rubber hand illusion, if you probably know that. Lay it out and explain it to people. So the rubber hand illusion is this illusion where you have a chap, he puts his hand right here.

10:46

and then you have his right hand underneath the table, right? And so me, Balan, the experimenter, will stroke and tap the hand of the experimental subject. I'll go stroke, stroke, tap, tap, tap, tap, stroke, stroke underneath the table. And I'll stroke and tap the table in front of Joe, the subject. I'll go tap, tap, stroke, stroke, stroke, stroke, tap, tap. And about two minutes of me doing this, he will feel touch sensations arising from the table.

11:13

And I don't mean this in kind of an abstract metaphorical sense. I mean this literally. He will have touch sensations, somatosensory regions of his brain becoming active from this process. Yeah, well, that's a very strange element of human perception, right? It must be strongly associated not only with our ability to

11:32

map sensation onto our bodies, but also with our ability to use tools. So I know, for example, we're very good at it. Like if I pick up a screwdriver, it takes me virtually no time to use the tip of the screwdriver in a manner that very much approximates the tip of my finger. And then when we go in a car, essentially what we're doing, especially once we're expert drivers, is that we expand the dimensions of our

11:57

or bodily perception to include the car, right? So you're feeling with the tires, you're feeling with the brake, right? And that's, well, part of my understanding of that is that that's very tightly associated with our tool using proclivity, 'cause a tool is a bodily extension. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. It's an embodiment, right? So in two minutes, I turn this subject into a table, right? And then more than that, if I, me, you know, Baland was to,

12:25

take a hammer and go like this on the table, he'll go, you know, he'll feel pain sensations, right? So the pain regions of his brain will light up if I was to look in a scanner and, you know, look at the neurons there. So it shows you that in that way, you can take

12:41

something you can first of all you can create a sensation of a of a this table belonging to you but then being part of you big part of you right it becomes an embodied part of you yeah yeah but then beyond that you you afflict pain now to the person to the table in fact and then you will feel yeah well that would all well that would also be part of social perception i presume i read a paper not not long ago

13:05

if I remember the details carefully, they were looking at the difference either, I think it was, I think the dimension was agreeableness. - Right. - But it might have been psychopathy. - Right. - Which would be the opposite of agreeableness, let's say. That more agreeable people, so less psychopathic people,

13:24

feel, have more pain activation to the perception of other people's pain. - Right. - So you could imagine that part of the utility in being able to morph your pain sensitivity, even to represent something objective like a table. - Right.

13:40

That's also a variant of my ability to map my own body, let's say, onto your body so that the empathy that I feel for you isn't conceptual. And I've really been thinking about this in terms of how we understand each other because it looks to me like what we do to understand each other is I notice what your aim is partly by watching your eyes. Right.

14:04

I infer your aim. Once I infer your aim, I can inhabit your perceptual space because if I know your aim, I know the objects that surround you. But I also know how your emotions are configured because they're configured in relationship to the aim. If I can adopt that aim, then I can embody those emotions and perceptions. I can read off that embodiment and then that's…

14:25

So the understanding is actually my simulating you on my own neural architecture and then drawing the appropriate inferences from that. And it looks to me like children probably develop that ability. Some of it's nascent, I would say. Some of it's there.

14:40

It's very interesting. So we actually, we were the first group to show that people with OCD who has very fixed sense of self, right? So they wash their hands all the times, washing and scrubbing. When they do this illusion, they have a much more sensitivity to it to the extent that there's a control condition for this illusion where you, so the illusion, for the illusion to occur, you have to stroke and tap, tap, tap, stroke and stroke and tap in a synchronized manner. That's important, right? So that's key.

15:09

Right. So you're linking the visual perception to the kinesthetic perception? Absolutely. Absolutely. Right. But in people with, oh, so the control for this, by the way, is if you do it in a random sequence, like tap, tap, stroke, stroke, but everything is just random. Right. And you do, again, the touching and stroking is random. Then the illusion will not occur or it would be slightly. So you have a slight illusion.

15:28

illusion there or most of the time no illusion. So this is the key control for the illusion. Right, so let's just walk through this so everybody understands clearly. So you have someone with their arm on a table, let's say, their left arm. Their right arm is under the table. So they can no longer see it. Now, what you're doing then is you're interacting with their hidden arm physically. And at the same

15:51

But they can't see that. They can't feel it. At the same time, you interact with the table where they can see it. Absolutely. So you're syncing their visual perception with their kinesthetic perception. Absolutely. But their visual perception isn't focused on their own hand. Right. Now they start to react to the table like it's a hand. Correct. Okay, now you're extending this to the OCD situation. Yes. Okay, so elaborate on that. Absolutely. And I just want to, just one comment.

16:15

The point here is that I mentioned a table. So the original experiment was done with a rubber hand, right? - Right, right. - But I'm using table because it's more, it illustrates the experiment better, I think, and you can have a table as well. - People would start responding to a rubber hand as if it was their own. - So instead of a table, you would just have a rubber hand that looks like your own hand,

16:36

And then you stroke and tap the rubber hand, right, in front of the person. Right, with their other hand hidden. Correct. They start to respond to the rubber hand as if it's theirs. Right, right, exactly. And then flinch if there's a threat to it. They flinch if there's a threat to it, right? Yeah, okay. And that can be extended to something as inanimate as a table. Correct. Or in fact, you can do it in air. So, you do know Rich McNally? Yes. Yes, yes, yes. A common friend, right? Yeah, yeah. So, magnification.

16:59

One day, McNally and I did it in the air. So I did it on Rich. Call him Rich. So stroke, stroke, tap, tap, in the air. And he felt the rubber, like his own hand was floating in the air. It was kind of spooky. Wow. He went, my God, what's happening? I feel my hand is floating in the air. Right. You know, that must also be associated with a really profound, with our sense of what constitutes ownership. Right. You know, because…

17:25

The idea that something is yours or that something is mine

17:29

there's no reason to assume that that isn't an extension of something like embodiment. It's certainly the case that, you know, if people's cars are attacked, let's say, or kicked, they respond to that very much as if it's a bodily assault. Right. Right. And so it begs the question, how much of our embodied concept of ownership, like that concept on which we platform the philosophical and philosophy and conception of ownership is actually embodied

17:59

the underlying scaffold for that is our ability to extend our embodiment to even inanimate objects. Right. Because then they start to become part of us. Right. And part of what you're pointing to with your emphasis on brain plasticity is that

18:16

identity itself, even in terms of perception and pain sensitivity, is fluid and dynamic to a degree that you wouldn't immediately presume. - Absolutely, and I do want to differentiate between plasticity and then the dynamic nature of the function of the modules of the brain. So for example, you have, in terms of the rubber hand illusion, it shows that, for example, we have a structure called the TPJ right here, temporal parietal junction is the fancy name for that.

18:43

That structure is important for taking all the sensory modalities, touch, hearing, feeling, right? So smelling and sort of…

18:51

unifying that into a whole and… That's a cortical area? It's a cortical area. Where is it located? It's called a TPJ, so it's temporoparietal junction. So it's kind of strategically located between the different sort of occipital somatosensory region and the temporal… Right, so it's a region that overlaps physiologically between the different sensory integration systems. It's like a crossroad, so to speak. Right. Is it the same area that's used for silent reading?

19:20

Silent reading, I'm not sure. Okay, well, the reason I'm asking about that from what I remember is that the region that we use for silent reading is the space, is the overlap between the auditory and visual cortex. Right. Which makes perfect sense, right? Because we're basically, when we read silently, we're using our eyes as ears. Right, right. Right, right. And those overlapping areas. Okay, so this area…

19:44

It's a place between many of this, between a variety of the different sensory integration. Between different sensory integration. It's a hub for integration. And interestingly, actually, it's also involved in the self-other distinction. So we have a distinction of the land here, Dr. Peterson over there. And then… That's why we can't tickle ourselves. That's why we can't tickle ourselves, right? But that…

20:03

that part of the brain, if you zap that, sometimes the self-other distinction can break down. So you feel like you're merging into another person. So that's very interesting. So it has that function. It also has connections to the frontal lobes, which is involved in, obviously, in empathy and seeing the perspective of somebody else. So like a theory of mind,

20:22

What is Dr. Peterson thinking right now? What is his agenda right now? What is his motive? So that ability is also involved. And this comes to a psychopathy point, actually, because if you have the temporal parietal junction being involved in

20:37

body construction. So it's involved in self and constructing a body image, which is expanded in the rubber hand illusion, but also involved in seeing your perspective as well. So it's very dynamic. Experiencing your perspective. Experiencing somebody else's perspective. So,

20:54

Success in business isn't just about offering an amazing product or service, though that's certainly essential. What truly sets thriving companies apart is having powerful, reliable tools working behind the scenes to streamline every aspect of the selling process. These are the systems that turn the complex challenge of reaching customers and processing sales into something that feels effortless and natural. That's exactly where Shopify enters the picture, transforming the way businesses operate in the digital age. Nobody does selling better than Shopify.

21:20

They're home to the number one checkout on the planet. And here's the game changer. With ShopPay, they're boosting conversions up to 50%. That means fewer abandoned carts and more sales going to your bottom line. In today's world, your business needs to be everywhere your customers are, whether that's scrolling through social media, shopping online, or walking into a physical store. Shopify powers it all, seamlessly connecting your business across the web, your store, customer feeds,

21:42

And here's the truth. Businesses that sell more sell on Shopify. Join over 2 million entrepreneurs who have already discovered the power of unified commerce with Shopify's all-in-one platform. Upgrade your business to the same checkout we use with Shopify. Sign up for your $1 per month trial period at shopify.com slash jbp, all lowercase. Head to shopify.com slash jbp to upgrade your selling today. That's shopify.com slash jbp.

22:09

One of the things I thought while you were discussing that is the theory of mind, theories of autism, that autistic people lack theory of mind. But I've never really liked that theory because autism is a really fundamental disorder. Autistic people generally don't like people and they don't like to be touched. That's not conceptual. Right.

22:32

Mammals like to be touched. If you don't like to be touched, then something's gone wrong at a level that's like under mammal. It's really deep and profound. It's not some, what would you say, alteration in philosophy. But one of the things that is characteristic of autistic people often is that they don't look at people's faces. They don't look at eyes. Right? So then you could imagine it's not exactly a lack of theory of mind. It's that if I don't,

23:00

watch your eyes, I can't infer your aim. If I can't infer your aim, I can't mimic you on my own platform. So I wonder to what degree, I don't know if these experiments have ever been done. I mean, it isn't obvious to me exactly why autistic people don't watch the face. It's very mobile and…

23:23

And that is something that seems to upset autistic people. Like they often don't like furniture moved in a room that they're familiar with. But I wonder what would happen to their ability to experience empathy if they were autistic.

23:37

to attend to eyes, to learn to perceive the face properly. It probably could be trained. So I know Richard Davidson, he's done some studies looking at amygdala activation in autistic children, and they do have an amygdala that's dancing with activity whenever they look at eyes. So they have that

23:57

But it's not entirely known why. It probably has to do with the fusiform face area. So there's a region of the brain specialized for recognizing faces. Right, right. And so it has to do with that. But this is… Properly oriented faces only, right? Properly oriented faces, exactly. If they're upside down, it doesn't work. It doesn't matter. Yeah, yeah. And to be frank, this area of the brain is also involved in dry classification of objects. So not only faces. Musical instruments? Yes.

24:23

Probably. I think so. It's more dry, so it goes like a guitar from a piano or something like that. It doesn't have that specification. To have specificity, you have to go higher up in the system. So it has this more banal quality to it. So obviously in visual processing…

24:44

you have a hierarchy of where it becomes more complex with each step of envision. And then the highest, so then it goes to a point where you start classifying objects in the world. That's the fusiform phase area.

24:58

And then after that, you go to Vernica, which is more sort of meaning and purpose. And then you go to things like the hippocampus, which is involved in things like memory. So it goes from more simple stages of visual processing to dry classification, faces, Dr. Peterson's from Alex, from Kim knowing different people. So that's that part. And then going to higher centers.

25:24

So that's kind of that process. So let's go back to Ramachandran. I was really interested in his work for a long while, especially on hemispheric lateralization and neglect. Fascinating. Now, some of the experiments that you described emerged

25:42

Because of Ramachandran's investigations into neglect, right? Originally. So neglect, for those of you who are watching and listening, is a very strange phenomenon. So if you have a stroke and you have, correct me if I get any of this wrong because it's been like 20 years since I thought about it, right parietal damage? Yeah, right parietal damage, yeah. You'll lose your perception of the left side of your body. But more than that,

26:07

this is where it gets very weird, you lose the perception of left itself. And I've tried to imagine it sort of like, you know how everything that's behind you when you're looking forward, it isn't like it's missing. It's just simply not there at a level that's even more profound than missing. And I suspect what happens to people with right parietal damage is that the absence that characterizes your lack of perception of what's behind you

26:36

extends so that now it's three quarters of the world instead of half. Anyways, weirdly enough, you lose your ability to perceive the left side of everything. And I have no idea how to conceptualize that. But one of the consequences of that is that people with profound neglect

26:54

will wake up and they'll become aware of their left arm or their left leg after they've had a stroke, and they'll try to throw it out of bed because they think it's someone else's. And if you get them to draw a clock, for example, they'll draw half a clock and cram all the numbers into the right-hand side. And if you give them a plate, they'll eat half the food. I still can't figure this out because how do you think that works? It's like if I pick up my phone,

27:20

Now, I look at the phone, so now the phone is foregrounded, but I'm not aware of the left side. Now, if I'm looking at the room now, do I miss the left side of the room? And in the room,

27:35

Do I miss the left side of all the objects? Like, I just don't understand how the hell that works perceptually. Right, exactly. They somehow don't attend to it, right? So they can draw a flower the whole day, but they only draw half of the flower. And you keep telling them and they say, well, I did my best, I'm drawing it, but they can't attend to that part of the brain.

27:56

Mind you, the parietal lobes is involved in spatial orientation, knowing not only the body where it is in space, but also the spatial layout of the room, right? So it has that component. So it's a really strange disorder. And in order to understand how they are experiencing this at a subjective level is really critical. It's a mystery of sorts. Ramachandran also did experiments with

28:21

Irrigation, didn't it? Irrigation. But before we go there, I just want to… So the parietal lobes and superior parietal lobule, another fancy name there, right? So just above the temporoparietal junction is specifically involved in creating a body image as well. So the…

28:37

the TPJ we talked about, taking information from various sensory modalities and then whispering information to the superior parietal lobule, this area just above it, its neighbor, right? It's involved in creating a subjective sense of a self, the feeling that I occupy this body and not somebody else's body, right? So when people have

28:57

a stroke to that part of the brain, as you mentioned, they will sometimes throw their hands out and say, this arm doesn't belong to me, it belongs to you, or it belongs to my dad, or it belongs to, you know, this person or that person. So literally they will become delusional. You can play chess with them, you can have conversation, nothing, nothing is wrong in otherwise, they're not delusional, they're not psychotic or anything like that.

29:20

But after they have the stroke affect this region of the brain, they will just say that this arm doesn't belong to me. Or sometimes they might even say, you might ask them, you say, well, they might deny the paralysis. So that's anosognosia, right? So you say, Joe, your arm is paralyzed. They'll say, no, it's not paralyzed. Well, then touch my nose, Joe. And they'll say, okay, fine.

29:44

And they will take the lifeless arm and lift it like this and say, I'm tossing it, doctor. I'm tossing it. Literally taking it up like that. Yeah, well, it's almost as if… I wonder, too, if that's an…

29:55

Is it a lack of capacity to update as well? Like it seems to me that what must be happening is they're using a pre-stroke representation of their body. - Right. - And the tissue that's been destroyed normally would update that. 'Cause I remember too with Ramachandran's experiments when he irrigated, this is very weird too everyone,

30:16

Ramachandran would irrigate the ears, so pour water in cold water in the ears of, left ear if I remember correctly, left ear, of the people who had neglect and it would make them shudder. Now that disturbed their vestibular system which is involved with bodily orientation. And it would shock them into the realization that they had

30:37

a paralyzed left side and they would break down emotionally, catastrophically with the realization that they'd been so badly damaged. But then the effects of the irrigation would wear off and they'd snap back into this

30:53

And that's why I think it's not exactly a delusional state. I think they're stuck with the body representation that existed before the stroke and what's been eradicated. The systems that could update that, the right hemisphere systems, they don't exist. So there's no way of fixing it. There's no straightforward way of fixing it. So one way to approach this or sort of think about this is that

31:17

you know, the left side of the brain, the left hemisphere and the right hemisphere have different functions. I just want to make it clear to the listeners. I know you know this, right? But so they have different functions. So intriguingly, it's only in the right side. If you have the stroke in the left, they will not have this delusion. That's the funny part, right? So it's only in the right. So this tells you there's something going on about self in the rights that's obviously different. Or alteration of self. Alteration of self, right? Interestingly, if you have a stroke to the prefrontal on the left side,

31:44

you will develop catastrophic reactions to anything. So you might have a conversation and start crying in the middle of the conversation without any obvious reason. If you get a stroke in the right prefrontal, you will have…

31:59

delusionally optimistic. So you'll go out and buy a Rolex if you can't, you know, and get, you know, become manic effectively. So it shows us that the left hemisphere is involved in positive emotion and the right is involved in negative emotion. And in fact, today, when you use things like TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation, you might zap the left hemisphere in people with depression and make it more active and you end up with less depression. So the brain has these functions that are, um,

32:26

very lateralized and highly unique to each side of the brain. - Well, so Alconen Goldberg, I really liked his model of brain lateralization. - Yep. - Novelty versus routinization. And I know Ramachandran developed a theory that was either parallel or influenced by Goldberg, I can't remember.

32:47

What that would imply, if the right hemisphere is associated with novelty recognition, so it recognizes anomaly. Yeah, that's right. It makes sense that it would signal negative emotion because the first thing that should happen when something you don't expect occurs, because that means the routine you're running

33:05

doesn't map the territory well, right? Because what I'm trying to do is whenever I run a perceptual routine, I have a goal in mind and I'm presuming that my perception is adequate to the task. If something anomalous occurs, like if I tell you a joke and you don't find it funny or maybe I tell you a joke and you get offended by it,

33:24

then obviously the way I've mapped you is wrong, the way I've mapped the joke is wrong. God only knows how much error I've made. That's gonna be signaled by the right hemisphere. Anomaly, negative emotion. Okay, then you're gonna attend to that. Now, the problem with depressed people

33:43

they attend to it catastrophically. So like if I make a, say if I'm depressed and I make a mistake like that with you, we're sitting here talking, I make a little joke and you either don't find it funny or you act offended. Even if that only took a brief amount of time, a depressed person would think, well, that didn't go over very well.

34:05

Obviously, I'm not very funny. Obviously, I don't understand people very, I don't understand this person very well. - Right. - Oh, that's because I really don't understand anyone very well. - Right. - I didn't understand people very well in the past and I don't understand them well and I'm very unlikely to learn how to do that in the future. - Yeah, yeah. - People who are unable to learn like that socially, they're not very useful people.

34:33

Some people are so useless that it would be better if they weren't around at all. I'm one of them. Yeah. Right. And so I'm wondering if the, so you can imagine the right hemisphere when it's analyzing a novel, something novel opens up that entire space of potential consideration. Right. My suspicions are that the left prefrontal cortex probably puts a box around that continually, you know, because the right level of analysis, if I make a joke about,

35:01

with you and it falls flat. I should note that, but I shouldn't leap to catastrophic conclusions to begin with. I should just note it like it should now become a

35:13

what would you say, an object of potential future significance. And I've noticed in my clinical practice that people who are well regulated emotionally won't undergo a detailed investigation into an anomaly until it repeats, let's say three times until there's a pattern. Whereas depressed people, they'll leap to the worst possible conclusion almost immediately. And that does look like something like

35:36

like that left hemisphere, left prefrontal hemispheric dysfunction that you described. Yeah, yeah. So you can imagine that the right hemisphere notes the novelty, elicits negative emotion, then opens up the search space, which could be indefinite. Like the reason your joke didn't go over might be because you are the kind of unpopular loser who…

35:58

wreaks havoc wherever they go, but that shouldn't be your first conclusion, right? So you lose the left hemisphere system and that whole cataclysmic reaction is dysregulated. I like that. I mean, it makes sense, right? So the right hemisphere is more emotional, big picture oriented, as you say, and it could be that it goes into this infinite loop of possibilities in this big space land where there's no way it can really get fixed. There's no anchoring, right? So that's correct. Okay, so I would say…

36:27

I'd like to know your thoughts about, so I'm very interested in archetypal psychology. Right. And-

36:37

Carl Jung had a very specific hypothesis about dreams, which I really like. And this is one of the things I wanted to talk to you about today because you're interested in dreams and you've talked about them as simulations. So his idea about dreams, which is a brilliant idea, is that it wasn't hemispherically localized for him because he didn't have the neuroanatomical knowledge. So imagine that you encounter an anomaly. Okay, that's the place…

37:05

You could say that that exploration that we just described, which is, you know, is there something wrong with me socially? Is it generalizable? Am I a cataclysmic person? All of those are fantasies of a sort, right? And you could think of the fantasies as attempts to remap the anomalous situation. Right. Right. And then…

37:26

Like a shallow remapping would require just a tiny alteration of fantasy, but a large remapping would mean a whole reconfiguration of character. Jung's idea was that the dream was a place of exploration for the remapping of anomaly and that it could be undertaken safely because you could explore different perceptual configurations in the safety of dreams without exposing yourself to any danger. Yeah. So…

37:56

You could imagine that, so the right hemisphere signifies, detects anomaly, and it begins this exploration process, but it's using the landscape of fantasy, which would be simulation, to start to explore. And you could imagine too that one of the ways that that might be triangulated would be, imagine that your right hemisphere has aggregated a couple of different anomalies. Right.

38:28

Not enough to be cataclysmic about them, but to have them sort of there as mysteries. Right. Okay, now you search through the fantasy space. Yep. And one of the new fantasies explains like several anomalies simultaneously. Yep. My guess is that's something like fantasy-related insight. Yeah. Because you'd see that in therapy, you know, where someone will lay out a couple of different problematic scenarios. Yeah, yeah. And then…

38:57

contemplate the commonalities and sometimes they'll stumble across something that, oh, I see, I'm looking at this whole thing wrong. It's a restructuring of the theory and then those three anomalies are all accounted for. And that's gonna give you a sense of conviction, right? 'Cause now you have a theory that accounts for the new information. And the dream is part of that process. It's the birthplace of that.

39:20

the birthplace of that renovelization of conception. Yeah, yeah. No, that's interesting. So I think definitely in terms of using the right hemisphere in dreams, there's got to be something there. So I'm not sure how much this has been explored in terms of the right hemisphere only. But that's definitely because dreams is so much about emotional updating and emotional creating a sense of…

39:44

making sense of an emotional landscape, right? So in dreams, for example, it's heavily populated by people, right? Right, right. REM dreams, for example. So each night you cycle through different stages of sleep, stage one, two, three, and then you…

39:58

have deep sleep and then you have REM sleep, rapid eye movement sleep where your eyes go from side to side. During this stage of sleep, you're paralyzed from head to toe. So you have structures in the brain called the ponsonid medulla in the lower part of the brain that paralyzes your entire body so you won't act out your dreams and hurt yourself, right? So this is, so I want to lay the foundation before I get to your point, right? And that sets up

40:19

the stage for exploration without risk. Right, so now you can engage in this laboratory of testing, a testing space without any fatal consequences, right? You can do whatever you want and you don't hurt your sleeping partner or yourself. So you have that paralysis, first of all. You're in a physiological straitjacket, so to speak, right? Yeah, and you can explore deeply enough so that you can actually reshape not just your conceptions, but

40:42

but your perceptions. And that idea accounts for some of the bizarreness of dreams. If you're exploring at the level of perception, it's going to seem bizarre, obviously. So I just want to sort of go through this. So first of all, you're paralyzed in REM sleep, right? From head to toe, you can't move. Your eyelids can move because of a different circuit, by the way. I just want to add that. So this is a different circuit for the eyelids.

41:06

Now, interestingly, the emotional part of the brain, the limbic centers tucked behind your ears become hyperactive. So you have that. Your prefrontal lobes and the CEO of the brain becomes less active for some reason. So that part of the brain dials down, right? Restriction of inhibition? Right.

41:24

restriction of inhibition and so everything in the world becomes uh less focused right so you can less constrained less constrained right so so you don't think in a logical yeah yeah straightforward abc like manner right so if i wake somebody up from REM sleep and say well the word and tell him the word sun he will think of of of of chair instead of moon right so he doesn't relate

41:48

think in a logical, serial manner. He will think in an unrelated manner. In fact, he will be more likely to say sun and share versus when somebody's awake and I ask him, well, what do you think of now when I say sun? They might say moon. So they are more likely to relate unrelated words. So they think in a- Which is what you'd expect if it was an exploratory process. Exploratory process, right? So the prefrontal lobes,

42:11

turn down, right? The emotional part of the brain dial up, right? So you have that. You're paralyzed from head to toe. Now, this is a perfect cocktail for strange things. Not only that, but also the chemicals in your brain that have to do with logical and linear thinking, noradrenaline. You have adrenaline in your body when you're anxious or you're excited. You have adrenaline. You have noradrenaline in the brain, but also in the body. But noradrenaline is a cousin chemical of adrenaline. Now, this process

42:39

But this, this, this chemical… Missions to Mars, driverless cars, AI chatbots, feels like we're already living in the future. Well, Robinhood is built for the future of trading. Robinhood's intuitive design makes trading seamless so you can spot opportunities to take control of your trades.

42:54

You can now even trade your stocks and crypto all in one place. Sign up for a Robinhood account today. Investing is risky. Robinhood Financial LLC member SIPC is a registered broker dealer. Cryptocurrency services are offered through an account with Robinhood Crypto LLC. Robinhood Crypto is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services.

43:16

It turns out there's a structure in the brain, in the brainstem called the locus cellulareus. Cellulareus. Cellulareus. Cellulareus. Yes, exactly. Your pronunciation is brilliant. 32,000 cells pitch black in the brainstem. They will stop, you know, secreting noradrenaline during REM sleep. So that means your way of thinking about the world is unfocused. It's unfocused.

43:40

It's like spacey, it's creative, right? Yeah, unconstrained. Unconstrained by prior conviction. Absolutely. Or prior learning. Right. So this is a perfect cocktail now for craziness. The vestibular part of your brain become hyperactive. You know, the central motor region of the brain that has to do with automatic sort of behavior become hyperactive.

44:00

Even though they're paralyzed. Even though you're paralyzed. So that's why dreams, you can sometimes feel like you're running, but you can't control your legs. You feel like some monster is chasing you, but you can't move or you feel like you're controlled like a puppet on a string. And that's because the parts of the brain, it has to do with automatic movements. Sporadically, the neurons, they're fire. So you cannot control your movement. So you have all that.

44:25

And then you have the emotions, and it seems like then it's just perfect for what you're saying then, that the right hemisphere type of thinking of exploration and emotion is just, it's hyperactive. Right, so it's a safe place for…

44:41

for simulation, for exploratory simulation that can be so extreme that it converge on the bizarre. - Yeah. - But why not? Why not explore the outer limits under safe conditions? - Absolutely. - Well, I've also, I remember that if you wake people up from REM sleep, the most common emotion they report is anxiety. And that makes sense too if you think about this as part of the, what would you say?

45:06

the reconfiguration in the face of novelty process. Because the most appropriate first response to something anomalous is anxiety. It's to, because technically what anxiety does is

45:23

Stop the operation of… It stops current operation. Right. So that's like a prey… Yeah. It's like a prey animal response. Yep. Freeze. Yep. Why? Because what you're doing has either not worked or exposed you to danger. So now you're not where…

45:39

You're not where you thought you were and what you're doing isn't doing what you thought it was. Okay, now what? Stop. That's anxiety. Then, then what? Then explore. So like if you throw a rat into a,

45:53

A new cage. The first thing it does is freeze. Then what it starts to do is to look around. I guess to begin with, it doesn't even want to move its eyes, right? Because it doesn't want to attract the attention of a predator. So it freezes and crouches down. And then…

46:09

If nothing additionally terrible happens, it starts to thaw. It starts to look and starts to sniff. Yeah. Right. And then it'll start to explore and remap the territory. Yeah. But that seems to be what's happening at the dream level conceptually. Yeah. As you imagine that

46:26

you're encountering a landscape of anomaly or novelty that's signified by the right hemisphere. The emotion that's elicited is anxiety with a subtext of curiosity. Right, right. Because both of those two things would be at play. And then the fantasy landscape can be elaborated so that even perception itself can be reconfigured because of the error. If you're betrayed by someone, you could say something like, I can't even look at you the same way. Right, and that means that

46:55

The betrayal has forced a reconception so profound that perception itself has been altered. Like you could find someone attractive. This happens often when people are dating. You could find someone attractive or unattractive on first meeting. And then as you get to know them,

47:12

Maybe you thought they were attractive to begin with, and that just goes away. Or you felt that they weren't that attractive to begin with, but as you get to know their character, let's say, then the perception itself shifts. It's not merely the theory of mind or the conception you have of them, right? You literally look at them differently. Maybe it's because, in part, you actually see, I don't know, if you reconfigure the

47:38

What would be the patterns of interaction in their face? You know, like someone graceful, for example, you're obviously perceiving something like a gestalt. And there's something charming and beautiful about that. My guess is if you see a person of high character across time, you can see their integration. And that that would make them graceful.

47:57

That would allow you to perceive their attractiveness in a way that you might not have been able to do superficially. Absolutely. That's very interesting. Yeah, yeah. Well, to go back to the whole dream thing, right? So one of the things is that it's populated by a lot of people. And that's, again, right hemisphere is actually involved in

48:14

decoding social, like facial expressions, for example. So that's one thing that obviously autistic people have problems with. But for some reason, there's a lot of people, a lot of interactions in dreams. So you interact a lot with a lot of people. And usually actually these interactions are negative.

48:31

And this shows us that for some reason it's advantageous to dream of negative things because you're more likely to train your circuits in your brain to be able to… So to put it shortly, like if I have an encounter with a serial killer in my dream,

48:49

And I sort of overcome that. I'm not killed by it, right? By that serial killer. I can navigate that situation in an appropriate manner. I'm more likely to survive in real life. So it shows you that dreams has a lot to do with survival and training the circuits in the brain, making them solidify the ones that can help me survive more. So that's a huge part of it. Right. Well, and it would make sense too that what you should… Look, the more sophisticated you are,

49:17

your social perception right the less likely Even encounters with dangerous people are to go wrong. Yep I'll tell you a story about that. Yeah, so I had this landlord when I lived in Montreal and he was an ex-president of Hells Angels in Montreal and He'd been in prison and he was a rough guy. Yeah, and and

49:43

We couldn't communicate that easily because he spoke Joual French, which is very hard to understand, even if you're French. And I spoke English. And there was quite a big class difference between us. And I was from Western Canada and she was from Eastern Canada. And so, but we got along, you know. He lived right beside me and…

50:03

to the degree we could communicate, we did. And he did some artwork. He worked in neon, as it turned out, and I bought some of his pieces. And we kind of got to know each other insofar as we could. Now, the problem, his name was Paulo. The problem was that now and then he would go on a bender and he could drink, well, like an unlimited amount of alcohol over a three-day period, like 90 beer, you know, like… And…

50:31

He would drink himself to a point where it was not even obvious how conscious he was, but he was still upright. And then he'd drink up all his money, and then he developed a habit of coming to my door at like 3 in the morning to sell me like a toaster or a microwave because he needed money, because he wanted to keep drinking. And so I did that a couple of times. He showed up at like 3 in the morning. Now, he's a big guy, and he's tough.

50:57

I went out once to a bar with him. He put me on the back of his motorcycle, which is a 750 Honda, if I remember correctly. He put his wife's helmet on my head, which is a little tiny helmet, and away we went. He said, if the cops come after me, I'm not stopping, just so you know. It's like, well, that was the beginning of a very interesting evening. And he got into all sorts of fights at the bars because people would come up and like,

51:20

challenge him essentially stupid people and that didn't go well for them so he was touchy let's put it that way well I talked to my wife about this because she didn't like the fact that I was giving Paulo money for his like toasters and so forth because she knew that he was trying to quit drinking so and then it also scared her that he would come over like at three in the morning so one day he came over at three in the morning and he was standing there sort of swaying and looking at me

51:51

And I had to tell him that I wasn't going to give him any more money starting then. And I had to tell him why. And so I said, look, we know you're trying to quit drinking. And when you come over and I buy your toaster, then you go and drink. And I can't do that anymore because it's not good. And he looked at me for like 10 seconds. And I know I was looking at me. He was looking at me to see if I was drunk.

52:18

playing moral superiority games. Yeah. Yeah, in which case the interaction wouldn't have gone very well. Yeah. Right. And so the reason I'm bringing that up is because as your social perception becomes more sophisticated, the probability that you can navigate well in a complex and potentially dangerous situation increases radically. Right. So if you can practice that in a dream, now that should mean that you should concentrate on

52:46

elements of social behavior that didn't go your way that you don't understand. And that would take you into a landscape of, well, hard to tell, but possibly into a landscape of malevolence. That would explain, for example, why people go and watch horror movies and movies about serial killers and so forth. It's like,

53:04

You want to sharpen yourself up. And that's a good point. So the fact is that, you know, when you dream, your brain takes you on this exploration, right? And it looks at various social scenarios, for example, that evoke emotions in you. So it takes, you know, Dr. Peterson and put him in a room with Kim and Joe and see how he reacts. If the reaction is not an emotionally evocative one, it will literally take you and show you another scenario until it hits you.

53:32

on a scene that evokes your emotion, that gets you riled up, and then it explores that. So it has to be, okay. It has to have that element, and then it will go down that path more and explore it more. It'll say, this is interesting. Okay, I see. So it presents scenarios. Exactly. Until one evokes a limbic reaction. Absolutely. Now, but is it also searching for…

53:56

that are primarily negative or is it intensity? - Not necessarily. So it does, there's a huge dopaminergic aspects to dreams. So it's been shown that if you have a lesion to a part of the brain, the inferior parietal lobule, again, it's a region just below the superior parietal lobule, it's involved in creating images, but also it's, so if you have a stroke there, for example, you won't dream or the mesolimbic dopamine centers, this is a fancy name for the part of the brain where you have dopamine going to the prefrontal

54:25

cortex, if you have a lesion there, you won't dream as well. So bliss and dopamine, as well as images is involved deeply in– - Okay, so it's emotional intensity and valence. - Intensity valence, yeah. - Right, but it's tilted somewhat towards the negative. - Tilted somewhat towards the negative. - We are generally as human beings tilted somewhat toward the negative. - Absolutely, yeah. - So, okay. Okay, so your brain is playing with various scenarios. - Absolutely. - And if one evokes an emotional response,

54:53

So, you see, the thing is, if it evokes a negative emotional response, that would indicate that your adaptation is weak at that point, right? Because you're much more likely to be anxious about a situation that you haven't mastered. Right. Okay, so you could imagine that the evocation of…

55:11

negative emotion is an indication of weakness in conceptual structure. Okay. So now the dream is playing with various scenarios around that. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Evocation point. Yeah. So one, it's very interesting. So one thing that I want to make clear as well, it's that, you know, obviously, as you know, there's a corpus callosum that, that, that there's a bridge between the two hemispheres, allowing the two hemisphere to, to, to communicate. Right. So you have the right hemisphere and the left hemisphere. So these hemisphere, if,

55:38

If you literally cut it, you'll have two consciousness in one person, right? So it seems like dreams is also right hemispheric dominance for another reason because the things you will see in your dreams are like polygons

55:52

It's visual metaphors that you can't explain in language, right? So I can, it's like going through an art museum and looking at things, but in a very poetically, beautifully non-language way, right? So you can't describe it necessarily. And obviously the left hemisphere, the regions of the Wernicke and stuff like that is involved in language and understanding language.

56:14

But it seems like the poetic aspect of dreams is very much a right hemispheric thing as well. Well, that should be associated with both the novelty-routinization dichotomy. So the question is, well, how do you approach something that's novel? Well, if it's novel, if it produces a normal, if you don't understand it, you haven't encapsulated it in language. It's not routinized enough so that you have a…

56:41

propositional description of it. So you can imagine that during the day, when you're conscious, you're running well-routinized, propositionalized routines. But some of them don't work out as well as others. Okay, so now imagine the right hemisphere is sitting in the background

57:02

Mapping the failures. Yeah. Okay. So now you have like a collection of failures It's something like that now it's nighttime you shut down the propositional side and you open up the metaphoric side Yeah, and it's starting to explore that land. It's exploring. I think it's on exploring unexplored territory fundamentally That's the best way to conceptualize it, but it's also like the let it's the same as the landscape of insufficient adaptation Mm-hmm. Right and so and that should be associated with

57:31

negative emotion. Right, right. And now the question would be, what would be the utility of those metaphoric fantasies? Well, part of that's, okay, so imagine that around any perception, there's a cloud of connotations, right, that are first order. We already talked about that. So like a first order connotation for you would, if I saw you, would obviously be male, right?

58:00

Right. So, and then imagine that outside of that, there's second order connotations and third order, and finally things that are so distinct that they don't seem to bear any conceptual relationship. Right. Well, as you open up the metaphoric landscape, that connotation width should expand. Right. And then you could imagine that what you're trying to do is to explore a new network of connotations that would

58:29

map the territory more effectively right yeah i think and i think what is also interesting about dreams and that whole thing is that it seems to tap into a circuitry that's more mystical than the circuitry that we normally uh tap into i'm mystical i mean it seems like some of the

58:46

receptors involved in mystical experiences when you take psilocybin and things like mescaline and DMT and stuff like that, the serotonin 2A receptors. So one theory actually talks about how, so obviously serotonin is another neurochemical in the brain. The part of the brain that produces that, the dorsal rafin nucleus, also shuts down its production of serotonin. So you don't have serotonin in your dreams either in REM sleep.

59:12

And so you end up in this space without noradrenaline and without serotonin. But it seems like for some reason that the serotonin 2A receptors become dialed up. So that part of the serotonin 2A receptors become tickled for some reasons. And that is also happening in a psilocybin experience. It also happens in psilocybin experiences. Right, so that accounts in part for the overlap between the mystical experience and the dream experience. The mystical experiences and the dream experiences. So there's something there that is…

59:41

that's hypercosmic in dreams that you can't, it's ineffable, you can't describe it in language and even, and it's highly personal and it has salience for you. So one thing that I noticed about dream is a lot of people come and talk to me about their dreams all the time. They'll go, “Baland, you know, I had this dream, I saw this and that,” and they're very emotional about it and it's highly personal and cosmic, right?

01:00:02

But, you know, I kind of go, oh, that's interesting, but it's not really that interesting. But it has that significance for you as a person. And that's kind of about the dream thing. It has personal salience, kind of the type of personal salience you can get from a psilocybin experience.

01:00:21

When a woman faces an unexpected pregnancy, she often feels overwhelmed and alone. Many initially consider abortion their only option. But thanks to donors like you, these women may find their way to a preborn network clinic where they receive the support that they need to make an informed choice about their pregnancy.

01:00:37

At Preborn, women are offered compassionate care and a free ultrasound that allows them to see their developing baby. This combination of support and information helps many women choose to continue their pregnancies. There are many women out there who are unaware of their options. Take Acacia, for example. Acacia discovered that she was pregnant and felt completely overwhelmed and unsure about which way to turn. She found her way to a Preborn network clinic where the staff provided her with supportive care and a free ultrasound. Seeing her developing baby on the screen helped Acacia make the decision to continue with her pregnancy.

01:01:06

Okay, so…

01:01:38

What do you think account? Okay, so you said something paradoxical about that, right? That it's a weird combination of intensely personal and cosmic, which means intensely universal. It brings those two things together. Absolutely. That's a strange conjunction because those two things are actually quite far apart. The more personal something is in some ways, the less cosmic, the less universal it is. But the dream unites those two things. It kind of unites them, yeah. So I wonder…

01:02:05

See, an archetype in some ways bridges the gap between the personal and the cosmic. So here's an example of something you can do with a dream that's very effective. So imagine that you have a client who's chased by something awful in a dream and that repeats.

01:02:30

And then you ask them what they do and they say, well, I run away or I try to hide. Yeah. Okay. So then you say to them, well, here's what we're going to do instead. I want you to sit there, close your eyes, then make them relax so that they get into a state where they can visualize. Right. Say now, bring that dream to mind. Yeah. Okay. Now close your eyes, bring the dream to mind. Now tell me what's happening. So they'll replay the dream and say now, okay, now at the end, instead of running, okay,

01:02:59

Tell me what happens if you turn around and ask the criminal or the sadist or the monster what it's up to. Or what happens if you approach it instead of running? Well, and then the dream will continue in their imagination most of the time. And generally what occurs in a consequence of that is that dream goes away. Now, I think the reason for that, and I think this is akin to this bridging of the gap between the

01:03:29

personal in the cosmic is because their personal response to being chased is to run and hide. They're prey animals. Now, if you transform that into voluntary explorers, then what you're doing is you're inculcating an element of the hero element

01:03:53

myth into the dream landscape. It's like, no, the right strategy when you're threatened isn't to run. The right strategy is to turn voluntarily and to commence the process of exploration. That is what a hero myth is, by the way. That's very interesting. So let's go on that whole thing, right? So

01:04:09

The monster in your dream represents your hyperactive amygdala and the limbic centers of the brain being hyperactive, up to 30% more active in the dream landscape, right? Okay, so that's that overplay of emotion. That's the overplay of the emotion. And by the way, the hippocampus also turns out the memory part of the brain is also hyperactive in the dream realm.

01:04:28

So you have the memory spilling in into this narrative about a monster chasing you. So you give it identity, you give it name, you give it all these negative features. Okay, so you're contextualizing the emotion. You contextualize it based on the hyperactive emotion.

01:04:44

- Yeah. - Then it's chasing you and you can't run away because we said the motor, central motor generator of your brainstem is making it very hard for you to move. So you don't have the, so movement normally occurs in the motor cortex of your brain that gives you voluntary movement. But because that part of the brain can't compete with the central motor automatic part of the brain firing and making your behaviors all sporadic and automatic, so you can't get away.

01:05:10

Now, what you said was interesting. You said if you turn around and approach the monster, the monster will be, it will become diminished in strength. And that's interesting because we know in the real world, if you walk, simply by walking, you will turn down the activity of the amygdala because you're telling your brain or yourself that you are approaching, you're engaging in approach behavior instead of withdrawal behavior. Yeah, right, right, which puts you,

01:05:36

See, that shifts your identity in relationship to the thing that's chasing you. You're changing and saying, now I'm no longer the prey here. I'm the predator. I am the one that is doing the haunting. And so in that sense, it would make sense that the monster would vanish from

01:05:54

So that's very interesting. But I also want to touch on monsters since we're on the topic of monsters. So there's a condition called sleep paralysis, and I talk about it in my Peterson Academy course. There's a whole lecture on sleep paralysis. So are you familiar with sleep paralysis? I experienced sleep paralysis repeatedly for years. Yeah, especially if I slept on my back. That doesn't happen anymore. Okay. Okay.

01:06:17

But I'm very familiar with sleep paralysis, yes. Do you see any monsters? Can you explain? I'm curious. Most of my experience was being unable to move and no… I knew what sleep paralysis was. So even when it happened to be in my dreams, usually my experience was that…

01:06:39

Something was happening to me and I was frozen and unable to speak. And I knew I had to wake myself up. Like I tried to throw myself off the bed. Sometimes I could yell to my wife. I mean, literally in my life, I would yell and she'd have to come and shake me and then I'd wake up. But no, I didn't have the monster element to it. But I had clients who did in sleep paralysis. I think the reason that didn't happen is because I knew what was happening. Yeah, probably.

01:07:06

The monster too, just out of curiosity, so you could imagine that with this interplay between the hippocampus and the amygdala, if the emotional systems are more active, okay, so now there's lots of emotions being triggered. Now the memory systems are interacting with those emotions. They're going to flesh them out, right? So here's the emotion. Here's the thing that would be most likely to manifest that. So if it's a panoply of emotions, it would be an amalgam of emotion evoking states.

01:07:34

And there's no difference between an amalgam of emotion, eliciting stimuli and a monster. Those are the same thing. That's what a monster is. So a monster is your worst nightmare come to life. - It's your worst nightmare, right? It's whatever you dread, whatever is lurking in your unconscious mind, that's coming to the fore, right? And so during sleep paralysis, interestingly, you didn't have any of the monsters, but it turns out about 40% of people will see monsters.

01:08:02

Sleep paralysis is a terrifying experience. So you have this REM paralysis, obviously, you're paralyzed from head to toe during REM sleep, you're dreaming away. Occasionally for some people, they might start feeling like they can see their surroundings, so they might open their eyes and then they realize, my God, I'm paralyzed, I can't move, I can't speak. And it's terrifying at this point.

01:08:23

And then they look around and I had one of these experiences. So let me tell you about my own experience. So I was sleeping in my room as a teenager in Copenhagen and I grew up in a ghetto-like neighborhood in Copenhagen and I was lying there sleeping and then I woke up paralyzed, unable to move or speak.

01:08:40

And then I had this creepy feeling of a monster from the corner of my room approaching me. And it came closer and closer until it was on my chest strangling me. And I saw my legs flying up and down. And mind you, at this point, I was like, is this real? It was as crisp as this conversation you and I are having right now. What did the monster look like? Well, I'll tell you. Okay. So at this point, I just saw my legs flying up and down.

01:09:05

And it was choking me and I couldn't do anything. I was literally trying to kill me. Now on this occasion, I didn't see a monster. I didn't see a monster on this occasion, but I've had sleep paralysis since then on many occasions. And I've had various monsters. So I've seen like one was Colonel Gaddafi, you know him, eccentric figure. He was hovering over me when I was in Egypt. I was living in Egypt for a period of time in my early undergraduate years. I was a little bit out there. And I saw during the Libyan revolution,

01:09:34

Of all people, Gaddafi was in my bedroom hovering over me, you know, attacking me.

01:09:40

So that can happen during sleep paralysis. So he's the monster of the oppressive patriarchy. Yes, absolutely. My wife had a dream like that about Richard Nixon dressed in a general's outfit. So he was another figure. You could think about him as the monstrous form of the patriarchy. My wife kissed him. Okay. Right, right. So that was how she reconciled that conflict. Oh, yeah. Well, you can think about it. It's a funny move, right? Because…

01:10:08

The monstrous element of the patriarchy is it's the negative side of the social order. It's something everyone has to contend with. That's a class of monster, right? Like giant. It's the same thing as giant. And in hero mythology, of course, one of the categories of monster that the hero fights is giant. There's dragon. Dragon is a different thing.

01:10:30

That's more like a representation of the terrible aspect of nature. That's a good way to think about a dragon. Okay, so you said you were in Libya? Well, I was in Egypt. Egypt, yeah. What was happening around you? Around that time, there was a spring, the Arab Spring and the Libyan Revolution. All that was going on and I was watching CNN all the time, you know. Oh yeah, you should never do that. That I should never do, right? So I was doing that. I was sort of watching the news and, you know, I was influenced in some way. So in

01:10:58

And that's really interesting. So our research now in about seven countries has shown that, you know, whenever you have a cultural narrative for it, like stories of witches, of space aliens or whatever, you will have those lurking into your mind.

01:11:14

unconscious and you will see that manifest right so we show so those are categories of the monstrous those are your Carl Jung archetype you know figures appearing so for example in Egypt we show that the evil genius of Aladdin

01:11:30

You know Aladdin, the cartoon? You will have that appear in front of you. So, you know, they will have bloody fangs and everything will be creepy, very scary monsters you will see in Egypt. In Italy, for example, in the Pandavica region of Italy, you will see these giant cats or witches. So that's very common. And in the US, space alien abduction is very common in the US. So you might see that. Okay, so what that would imply is that you could imagine that the cultural…

01:11:59

Okay, so let's say the core of the revelation is diffuse emotional activation, much of it negative emotion. Okay, now the question is, what's the most basic form in which that could take perceptual shape? Okay, so the cultural narrative would be

01:12:19

like a first order elaboration of the core of that fear. So then it's not surprising at all that that's what your mind would latch on to when it was trying to clothe that emotion in perceptual reality. It's very interesting. Actually, so it turns out if you go first order and the basic level, most people will just see shapes and shadows. So they won't even see the monster clothed and have all these details. So it turns out

01:12:44

Right, that's the truly unknowable monster. That's the V1. That's the, you know, the occipital lobes in the visual cortex responds to lines and basic shapes. Oh, I see. Oh, that's so cool. So the first order…

01:13:00

It's a first order. It's simply the brain says, look, I don't even care about the details. I feel fear right now. I just want to hallucinate the basic. Just the sketch. Just the sketch, right? So you have the sketch. Okay, so then as you explore, does it move up the visual? Then it moves up the visual hierarchy, right? So we know then that you have a part of the brain called the MT, the motor part of the brain. Okay.

01:13:21

has to do with movement. So that's the next in the hierarchy. Then you have a part of the brain that has to do with, as we said, putting faces and depth and color. And so that comes as we move along the visual hierarchy. And then finally you reach the vernica and the meaning part of the brain, the hippocampus, and you go, my God, this is Freddy Krueger from Elm Street. He's attacking me right now. And he has this agenda and intentions. So, but most of the time, people will see these shadows and shapes and,

01:13:50

And that's it. And that's it. Are they most terrified at that level? It's very terrifying. Usually, the one reason for this is that usually when you don't have an identity, it's even more scary. Yes, of course, because you don't know what to do. Exactly. Yeah. So, okay. So then you imagine that, oh, that's so cool. So then you imagine that adaptation would proceed in this manner. So when it's only shapeless form, you have no idea what to do because there's

01:14:17

There's no concrete action you can take against a shapeless form. Okay, so now you could imagine using this in behavior therapy to deal with fears. It's like, okay, first of all, because you're trying to get it to take form. Well, why? Because the more form it takes, the more delineated the strategy can be for dealing with it. So you're saying, okay, so first of all,

01:14:39

You're doing a walk through the visual hierarchy. Yeah. You got just the shadows and the basic, and then you get the basic motion. And then what's the next level? You get depth, for example, you get color V4 area in the brain with color. So you might add color. So that could be another. Okay. And then it takes a face. Yeah. And then it takes an identity. It takes a face identity, and then you hook up the emotional part of the brain. So it gets emotions. Okay. The next thing you'd need above that would be.

01:15:04

a behavioral strategy. So if this named and faced figure now makes itself manifest, what do you need to do? And so, see, this is partly what you do if you're trying to treat someone for post-traumatic stress disorder is you help them specify very clearly, so give form to the nature of the fear, but that's not enough. It isn't enough to know your enemy, right?

01:15:30

That's better than not knowing your enemy because that's even more terrifying. But you want to lay out a behavioral strategy in relationship to that enemy that either quells the threat. So how do you deal with a criminal, let's say? Or like the optimal strategy would be to take the enemy and to transform him into an ally, right? That's like, that's the highest possible level of adaptation. Absolutely. Because who needs an enemy? And partly what you're doing, like in therapy,

01:15:59

You can go through someone's history and you can see where they might have had a repeated traumatic experience, like in a relationship. Then you have to find out what is it that's absent in their representation of relationship that's exposing them time and time again to that threat. Because it means there's something in their perception and their strategy. Because imagine this, imagine that you were selectively blind only for white vans that were approaching you from the left.

01:16:27

Can you believe that Good Friday and Easter are just around the corner? These are the most important holidays in Christianity, and Lent is our time to prepare our hearts. Lent is traditionally a time where Christians grow closer to God through prayer, fasting, and giving to others. And guess what? Hallow has created an amazing way to do just that with their Lent Prayer 40 challenge called

01:16:45

Don't worry if you haven't started yet, it's definitely not too late. This challenge helps us remember that Jesus is the way to heaven, showing us that true peace, love, and joy require genuine sacrifice. You'll love this. Mark Wahlberg and Chris Pratt are leading some incredible challenges about sacrifice and surrender. Jonathan Rumi and sister Miriam James will guide you through these powerful stories and prayer experiences. And Father Mike Schmitz, his Sunday sermons are absolutely spectacular.

01:17:11

This is already shaping up to be Hallow's biggest Lent ever with thousands of people from all over the world joining together in prayer. Here's the best part. You can get three months completely free when you sign up at hallow.com slash Jordan. That covers the entire Lent challenge. Once you join, you'll discover a huge catalog of guided prayers, meditations, music, and so much more, all designed to help you grow closer to God and find the peace that we're all looking for. So download the Hallow app today and jump into the Lent Prayer 40 challenge. Your spirit will thank you. Last.

01:17:42

It's not much of a deficit, but your recurring experience would be once every two years, you get run over by a white fan and you have no idea why. Right. Okay. So that's the account of the lack of your perception and the repeat experience. Okay. So now you have someone who has a repetitive trauma. You think, well, you've got a hole in your adaptive structure. Okay. Now you want to characterize that. So give it form and you want to

01:18:06

It's a perceptual and behavioral strategy to it. And that's what'll make the nightmare go away. And it's really remarkable. My experience clinically was that it took very few repetitions

01:18:22

Of a repeating dream. Yep. Where you inverted the strategy, the dream would almost, my experience was that if you did that once, the person wouldn't have the recurring dream anymore. Right. Right. And it's because you might say at some very deep level, they had conceptualized themselves in that situation as nothing but a prey animal. Yeah. You do the same thing with exposure therapy, with agoraphobia, right? As you get people to

01:18:49

imagine what upsets them and then begin to confront it. Yeah. Right. So, and the generalization element isn't the specific strategy of confrontation. It's the idea that they could be the one that confronts. Yeah. Yeah. It's very interesting. There's two points on that I want to go into that's very fascinating. So, first of all, we've shown that when you have a specific cultural narrative for it and a name for it, right?

01:19:14

the more terrifying and salient it becomes. So for example, if you live in Egypt and you say it's these evil genies, they come at night, they choke you, they strangle you, they kill you, then you will, first of all, have this experience much more frequently. So up to one third of more frequency to the experience. That's the first thing. If there's a cultural narrative. If there's a cultural narrative. So we compared Egypt to Denmark, my home country. So we compared these two countries and it turns out when, in Denmark, by the way, people say most of the time, it's just the brain, it's stress.

01:19:43

It's nothing terrifying. Like there's no higher like explanation for it, right? So it's just physiology. In Egypt, you have the opposite, right? The complete opposite. More frequent, more fearful. So 50% of Danish people will say, I think for Egyptians will say, I will die from this. This is fatal. So this is Egyptians, okay? So they have that. They say the paralysis lasts much longer, right?

01:20:10

So they will say the paralysis is intense. It lasts much longer. So it seems like through their cultural beliefs, the experience has become much more salient.

01:20:20

much more profound and impactful. It's got elements of psychogenic epidemic to it. Absolutely. And we said, is this true? Is this actually the case? And we went to Italy and we looked at the Egyptians, the Italians with these terrifying explanations of sleep paralysis and we saw the same pattern. The Italians would also have these long episodes

01:20:41

they would have them frequently and they would be extremely fearful. So it's like a contagious maladaptive conceptualization. Absolutely, right? And so it turns out we have a theory for why that occurs. So imagine little Lisa living on this fictitious island in Simbuktu, for example.

01:20:58

And she has this conversation with her grandmother over dinner. Let's say the grandmother says, at night, you will have this monster. It comes and attacks you, chokes you. It looks like this and that. It has all these features. She now goes to bed, right? And she has never had, by the way, she's never had sleep paralysis before, right? For the first time, she will have sleep paralysis now. She will wake up the next day and she will have sleep paralysis again. A few days later, she'll have it again.

01:21:27

And then a month later, it's become chronic at this point, and she'll go tell other people about it, and they will have it too. And then you might be asking, why is this the case? What's going on? And this is the idea. We think that, first of all, the grandmother implanted these ideas into her brain about what sleep paralysis is. When she's now sleeping in her bed…

01:21:48

she will have nocturnal arousal, meaning the emotional part of the brain will be hyperactive during the REM stage. And she will engage in this hyperconformatory behavior where she will monitor any paralysis sensations saying, “Is something holding me down? Is something choking me?” Right, now she's got a scary explanation for it. She's looking for an explanation for this now. And then whenever, and because of her emotional centers being hyperactive,

01:22:14

Whenever she feels something, she'll go, my God, this is it. This is it. And she'll open her eyes. And then the emotional, the hippocampus and all the narrative part of the brain will spill over into the experience. And she will literally see whatever her grandmother was telling her.

01:22:29

Now, you might say, why then does it happen a few days later? Well, that created profound fear. And so a few days later, she will have anxiety and stress, which will predispose her. We've shown that anxiety and stress predisposes you. So she will have it again two days later and three days later. And at this point, she'll go, my God, I'm possessed. It's no longer just one episode. This monster is gone.

01:22:53

you know, chronically possessing me and it's coming after me. And a funny way, funny thing is too, it is a kind of possession. It is kind of a possession. The grandmother transmitted the spirit to her. It's like a virus, right? Yeah, a meme. It's a monstrous meme. It's a meme, right? But at this point, what's interesting is that we've shown that people who have this episode, they will have more anxiety and more PTSD-like symptoms from this, right? So at this point, she might have these symptoms

01:23:20

small tease of trauma of the monster coming and attacking you and then creating an overall trauma. So it becomes almost a traumatic experience. Well, you can imagine how that would increase the probability that it would spread too because she might tell a friend, for example. That's what I'm saying, right? So she goes around and tells her friends about it. And it turns out then that

01:23:39

if you live in a culture like Egypt, it's twice as common versus Denmark. So we said that for an individual person, you will have it three times more than the person who has sleep paralysis. But beyond this, it's generally twice as common

01:23:54

in cultures like Egypt and Italy and so forth. So there's this element to it that's very, very interesting. And I want to take you to an experiment that your colleague Rich did, Rich McNally, that sort of encapsulates all this. So he showed that people who think that sleep paralysis is a space alien abduction

01:24:12

So these guys will say, well, I was sleeping in my bed and this gray came down in a spaceship. It attacked me. It choked me. It took out my semen. It was a lot of sexuality going on. And obviously we know from REM sleep, the hypothalamus and these parts of the brain are hyperactive. The sexual parts of the brain are hyperactive. So you have sexual arousal doing sleep paralysis. Right, right, right. So you have the monster coming down, taking their semen and all that.

01:24:37

Then they will have- Like a succubus from the Middle Ages. Like a succubus, right? Yeah, yeah. But then at this point, what's interesting is that these guys, when they listen to the audio script of their encounters of themselves narrating, so they'll listen to themselves saying, oh, I had this experience and this happened and that happened.

01:24:57

Their physiological reactions to that, their GSR, their sweating and their heart rate and blood pressure will be as profound as somebody who went to war. So somebody with actual PTSD who went to a war situation, the physiological reactions they have is comparable to somebody who was sleeping in their beds and having sleep paralysis. So for me, this shows me this might be one of the most interesting phenomenon in the time of science. Well, you can see, well…

01:25:24

Look, you know from psychotherapy that the simulations that produce the most psychophysiological response are the most curative. So, for example, when Edna Foa was treating people with PTSD, and I think she did this as well as anybody's ever done it, she would have people, this is counterintuitive in some ways, so imagine that the trauma was rape instituted. She'd have them

01:25:50

bring the rape incident to mind in as much detail as possible. Voluntarily. That's the critical element. Voluntarily. And then she did psychophysiological measurements and the participants who showed the highest levels of psychophysiological response to the reenactment were the ones that got better faster. Now, that was still damn hard on them while they were doing it, but it makes perfect sense that

01:26:17

the more hyperrealist simulation, the more learning would be associated with it, obviously. Absolutely. And you could see how that could be pathologized. So then the question would be, this would be the tricky question for a therapist, it's like,

01:26:32

Well, what do you do with a client that has a repetitive alien abduction experience? Because now that's a person who needs a strategy. Right. Right. Well, so I developed a therapy for sleep paralysis. I don't know. Maybe you're interested in that. I can tell you about that. All right. So it's a four-step solution that I came up with. So from my work around the world, I thought I got to have some method to help these people, right? So-

01:26:55

What, how could I help them? This was my thought. How can I help these guys? Right. And so one thing is that I noticed that, for example, prayer and meditation and prayer and thinking about positive things was helpful. In a lot of instances, people would lay down and think about, you know, whatever God they're believing and that would actually help them.

01:27:12

So that got me thinking about the attention system and the emotional parts of the brain and how I can bring that into the experience. Given that you have limited attentional capacities. And so if you're lying there and thinking about ghosts, because your emotional part of your brain, the amygdala is hyperactive and you know the amygdala…

01:27:29

has a lot of projections to the visual parts of the brain so it can tell you what to see in the world. So we know this, so it can spill over and penetrate the visual scene. So we don't want that. So I thought, how can I bring in the positive affect to the experience and make it more benign? So it has four components. The first component is cognitive reappraisal. You know these terms, meaning simply you say, look,

01:27:55

This is not a monster. This is just the brain. It's not terrifying. Let me change my thoughts about it. So that's the first point. You do that when the experience strikes. And you close your eyes too, just to filter any, you know,

01:28:10

visual inputs. So you're doing that with people when they're bringing the experience to mind? When they have the sleep paralysis episode. So these are the four steps you apply directly during sleep paralysis. Obviously, you learn them when you are awake and I train you. And you practice. You practice, right? Yeah, yeah, okay. So this is great. You made that point. So you have that first thing, you do the cognitive reappraisal saying, well, this is just your mind and brain playing tricks on you.

01:28:34

Next step is emotional and psychological distancing. You go, since it's just a brain, simply given that it's common all around the world, there's no reason for me to be scared of this. So you kind of distance yourself from the event. So that's the second part, right? Thirdly,

01:28:53

And this is where prayer and meditation and affect comes in. You put all your attention on a positive emotional object in your mind. So you bring to mind, could be God, somebody who believes in God. It could be your mother's face. It could be anything emotionally salient. And you focus hyper-attentively on that because then— That's why Mary is an antidote to the demonic spirit.

01:29:18

For example—

01:29:38

And meditate meaning you do a mindfulness kind of detachment. You say, I feel spasmy and pain in my legs and I feel heavy, but I'm not going to do anything about it. I'm just going to let it fly. I'm just going to just leave it alone. And this turns out, these four steps, if you apply it during sleep paralysis, we did a pilot study, a small study that showed it works.

01:30:01

Reduce sleep paralysis about 50%. So that's a significant amount. But obviously we have to do more studies. It's a very small study, but it's a first step. It's the first empirical study on this as a treatment for sleep paralysis. So I was very excited about that, but we need to do more research. But I think, what do you think? I walked the Via Dolorosa with Jonathan Paggio. Yeah. And we were talking about its significance. And so you could imagine that

01:30:28

Imagine that one of the things that you have to do in life is to, what do you say, reconcile yourself to the monstrous. While walking the road of the crucifixion does that because it enables you to voluntarily simulate intense suffering in the face of malevolence. Right now you can imagine that because it's voluntary rather than something that's imposed on you, you're switching your framework from victim to victim.

01:30:59

It's very strange. Accepting participant. It's like turning around to confront the monster. It's the same thing. So you could imagine, we talked already about the figure of Mary, let's say, as or briefly, as the maternal, as the antithesis of the monstrous. That's pretty obvious. But you could also imagine that

01:31:18

practicing your ability to accept the reality of malevolence and suffering. That's a meta strategy for dealing with the monstrous itself. It's something like that. That'd be my guess. That's a very interesting point. But you brought something to mind right now that I wanted to ask you about. So obviously I've seen your latest work on we wrestle with God and all this. So do you have any thoughts about prophetic dreams? The kind of metaphors, do you have any, have you written about this, for example? I wrote a little bit about it in the,

01:31:47

story of Noah. Yeah. Right. Well, so Noah is an archetypically good man. Yeah. But in the culturally and personally limited sense, in a way, Noah's as good a man as you could expect someone to be for the conditions of his time and place. Yeah. Okay. We know from the anthropological literature on elders that people who are singled out as elders in, let's say, traditional communities are

01:32:18

are people who other people are motivated to go to for advice when things aren't going well. Yeah, yeah. Okay, so now you might imagine, well, what sort of person would you have to be to be the sort of person who people would go to for advice when things aren't going well? Well, you'd have to establish a reputation of either having had things go well for you so you could avoid the catastrophes or having withstood a variety of catastrophes and still be highly functional.

01:32:47

Okay, so then that would make you a certain kind of person. Well, the insistence in the story of Noah is that if your orientation is upward, your intuition is valid. If your intuition is valid, you're a prophet because you can see things coming when blind people won't see them. Right, so why wouldn't, like, there's no difference between forethought

01:33:13

and prophecy, except time span. - Yeah. - Okay, so you might say, well, a mature person is capable of forethought. - Yeah. - Okay, now if you are mature and

01:33:26

maximally optimally configured in your moral aim, your capacity for forethought would extend. You'd be able to see things coming long before other people. And maybe some of that would reveal itself in like visions. Those are fantasies. They could be prophetic visions. They could come in dreams. Imagine that your dream land, imagine now you're the sort of person who's dispensed with the first order monsters.

01:33:50

Well, your dreams are still going to be doing something. They're going to be concentrating on more sophisticated forms of anomaly. Then maybe you master those. Well, then now you're up another level. Those are the sort of people that would be prophetic. Because look, one of the ways of being a prophet is just by looking at things that other people won't look at. Because even in the landscape of media, if a story comes out about what's monstrous, most people will just…

01:34:18

They won't look into it. Right. They'll deny it. Yeah. Well, imagine instead you delve into it, like you delve into the character of the monster in the dream. Right. Well, are you less prepared or more? Well, obviously, far more. Yeah. And I don't know, I don't think there's a limit to that. Yeah, yeah. Because there's also an insistence in hero mythology that,

01:34:42

You go to the heart of darkness. Right, right. No, it's very interesting. One reason that I bring this up is I used to live in Egypt, as I told you, and I was much inspired by the prophetic dreams of Joseph. I thought they were very striking, the sun and the moon bowing down and all these kind of things. So I think there's something very interesting about that realm of explanation and how that sort of spills and trickles into reality.

01:35:11

in religious scripture. So I thought that was… Well, like one of the… You might say that one of the strong functions of the religious is… The religious is a meta strategy for dealing with the monstrous. That's not all it is. But that's one of the things that it is. Like how do we contend with…

01:35:32

Not you could imagine how do I contend with my neighbor who's being a pain? Yeah, well then how do I contend with the class of neighbors who are being troublesome? Well, then how do I contend with the fact that people can be malevolent? Yeah, then how do I contend with the existence of malevolence itself? Yeah, right. There's those are you're getting deeper into the question with each of those iterations, right? By the time you get to the point of

01:35:58

where your question is, how do I deal with the existence of malevolence itself? You're in the religious realm. I would say that by definition. Yeah. Yeah, yeah. So it was weirdly the case when I was working as a clinician, when I was dealing with people who were profoundly traumatized. So they had their reasons.

01:36:17

The language always became religious when we were talking about it. You can't escape it because if you've really been hurt by someone who really wanted to hurt you, you've been touched by something like the spirit of malevolence. And when you're having a discussion about the nature of the spirit of malevolence, the language takes on like religious connotations and depth of its own accord.

01:36:41

It's quite interesting. So there's a phenomenon I'm sure you know of. It's temporal lobe epilepsy. So these guys will have epileptic seizures. So they will have that selectively in the temporal lobes.

01:36:52

So they will, and this is the emotional part of the brain, become hyperactive. And so they will see everything in the world as almost like they're living in a dream. Everything is poetic. Everything is highly salient. When I look at this pen right here, it's highly salient. It's emotional. It's godly. It's quite an interesting phenomenon. Dostoevsky had temporal lobe epilepsy. Yes, yes. So it's quite, and also…

01:37:15

Ramachandran and I wanted to study it more. Yeah. But we didn't get into it. We focused on some of the OCD's work instead. But it's interesting. So these guys will become hyper-religious as well. They will have hypergraphies. They will write all the time, you know, so they will develop this tendency to write more

01:37:31

And yeah, it's become hyper-poetic and quite an interesting phenomenon. And some people have argued that in the temporal lobe, you have the God center of the brain, so to speak. In that region, that's where it all emanates in terms of the emotional landscape that belief. Well, one of the things, you know, if we have a further conversation at some point, I'd like to talk about the…

01:37:59

like neurological conceptualization of the religious by definition. Because I think we're at a point in our understanding of neuroscience where we could have a conversation like that. So like one of the hypothesis, for example, would be, imagine, I think that perceptions are the axioms of thought. Yeah. Okay, now, and so an axiom is a very deep presupposition. Yeah.

01:38:26

You can imagine in any conceptual structure that there are shallow elements of the conception and then layers, kind of like the visual system, layers, and that there are axiomatic elements of the conceptual system. If an axiomatic element is accidentally shifted, you're traumatized. If it's voluntarily shifted, you're a hero. Right. Right. As the level of depth of the inquiry maximizes,

01:38:57

the inquiry becomes more religious in its nature. That's a definition. And so then you could imagine that the salience of the investigation magnifies in proportion to its depth. And so that would account for the experiential element of awe, for example. So that's something that would be very entertaining to discuss technically. So it's very interesting. And I think with the whole temporal lobe epilepsy, so the whole landscape becomes hyper-evolving

01:39:26

So the regions, we talked about the fusiform face area before. The regions from the cluster of cells in the fusiform and the emotional part of the brain become hyperconnected and hyperactive. So there's kind of a kindling going on. So that's why when you look at a dry object like a pen, it becomes hypercosmic and emotional and spiritual, right? But that's interesting. There's also the opposite in a way. So if you have…

01:39:54

what's called Cotard syndrome, everything in the world is dead. Everything in the world is, it's almost like depression in fact. - Yeah. - But everything is in the world. And you look at yourself in the mirror and you go, my God, I am dead. I'm a dead person. - Right, right, right. - The doctor will say, what do you mean you are dead? They say, I'm dead.

01:40:14

And then they say, what about if I take a needle and poke you and are you dead? And they will say, well, yeah. And then the doctor might go like this and they bleed. And they say, well, how come you're dead? You're bleeding. Can dead people bleed? And so, yes, they can.

01:40:29

Apparently. Apparently. Since I'm dead. Since I'm dead, right? So it shows you that, you know, something intriguing is going on in the brain. When these centers are hyperactive, everything becomes salient. Right. If they're underactive, you know, you are dead. You know, in fact, if that part of the brain, the face area in the brain and the emotional part of the brain is hyperactive…

01:40:50

There's another syndrome called Frigoli syndrome, where you go around and you say, everybody in the landscape looks like my Uncle Joe, for example. So you go around and say, well, this looks like my Uncle Joe, and this looks like my Uncle Joe. And the reason is that you have hyper-emotionality. You are hyper-emotional, right? Because of that vision, the emotion part of the brain and the face part of the brain are hyperactive, and they're hyper-connective. The connectivity is in overdrive.

01:41:17

And then you feel like, I shouldn't have emotions. That's how your brain concludes. I shouldn't have emotions when I go around in the landscape and looking at people. But I do. But I do. Therefore, your brain jumps to these absurd conclusions and go, these are all my Uncle Joe's. Yeah, well, you see the same. We should close with this and we'll move to the daily wear section. But you see the same thing with the onset of paranoid schizophrenia is that, say, someone is watching television and part of the speech becomes hyper-flexible.

01:41:46

emotionally significant. So now it stands out. And the more intelligent schizophrenics are more likely to become paranoid, by the way, because they build up the conceptual structures around the perceptual anomaly. But it's the perceptual emotional anomaly that's the core of the pathology. It's like, well, why is that so significant? Well, because you get this emotional hyper-response. It evokes anxiety and wonder. It's awe-inspiring. It's like,

01:42:16

Well, it's like this is particularly significant to me. It's a message to me. It's a message. What? It's a message from the television station? Is it a message from the satellites?

01:42:29

Is it a message from the Pope? There's no denying the reality of the experience, right? So then the paranoid conspiracy, let's say, is overlaid on top of that as an explanation for something that can't be challenged because it's so visceral, right? And it is dreamlike in the sense that you just described. And one of the things you also alluded to was that we actually base our sense of reality on that valence, right? So it's hyper real if everything's

01:42:55

overvalence, and it's dead if nothing has significance. Significance is the marker of the real. Right. Right. That's very different than objective reality. Okay, we should stop. Here's what we'll do on the daily wire side. You're at Harvard. Correct. And you're working really in the same area in the Harvard Department of Psychology that I was in the 90s. And so one of the things I'd like to talk to you about is

01:43:20

your experience there and your thoughts on the university system in general. So let's do that for half an hour on the Daily Wire side. Sounds good. So all of you who are watching and listening, you can…

01:43:32

Well, you can continue your investigation into exactly the topics that we described today. Obviously, at Peterson Academy, because I'm lecturing there and my guest is lecturing there, it's Introduction to Neuroscience. Correct. Yeah, yeah. And so that's one of the newer courses in our offerings. And so if you're fascinated by this sort of thing, it's so useful to know the anatomy and the neuroscience, as I said, because it gives you much deeper insights into neuroscience

01:44:00

Well, the nature of the problems that you might encounter and also into the nature of their, of what? The universe of potentially viable solutions. That's a good way of thinking about it. And we're putting a tremendous amount together right now on the scientific and cultural front in relationship to the overlap between brain function, neurochemistry, physiology, and behavior and science.

01:44:21

like profound philosophical conceptions. It's great to work at that interface. And so the courses that, well, this introduction to neuroscience course is one that focuses exactly at that nexus. We have several like that. So in any case, join us on the Daily Wire side for another half an hour. We'll talk about the state of the modern university focusing in this case on Harvard and the Department of Psychology there. Although you've been at other universities too, and we can bring them into the mix.

01:44:47

So join us on the Daily Wire side. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Yeah, really good to talk to you. Same here. Thanks to the film crew here today in Scottsdale and to the Daily Wire for making this possible. And finally, to all of you for your time and attention.

Edit:2025.03.28

橡胶手错觉及其意义?

通过橡胶手错觉探讨了体现的概念,强调了如何欺骗大脑将外部物体作为身体的一部分。

  • 橡胶手错觉展示了大脑将所有权和感觉归因于非身体部位的能力。
  • 这种现象与我们使用工具的能力以及我们如何扩展身体感知以包含工具有关。
  • 颞顶交界处(TPJ)在感觉整合和自我与他人区分中起着至关重要的作用。

睡眠麻痹如何影响我们对现实的感知?

讨论了睡眠麻痹症、其可怕的经历以及文化叙事如何影响人们对这些事件的看法。 

  • 文化叙事可以影响睡眠瘫痪发作的经历和频率。
  • 睡眠瘫痪症涉及快速眼动瘫痪,患者感到清醒但无法移动,经常出现幻觉。
  • 压力和焦虑可能会加剧这种现象,导致慢性体验。

梦境能成为探索的安全空间吗?

梦境作为情感和感知探索空间的作用,以便安全地测试新想法。

  • 由于快速眼动麻痹,梦境允许人们进行探索,而不会对现实世界产生任何影响。
  • 在快速眼动睡眠期间,大脑的情绪中心过度活跃,而逻辑中心受到的限制较少。
  • 去甲肾上腺素在快速眼动 (REM) 期间停止分泌,导致注意力不集中和无法进行创造性思维。

大脑如何构造怪物?

睡眠麻痹和梦境中我们脑海中怪物的构建,强调了文化叙事和情感触发因素的作用。 

  • 梦中的怪物通常源于高度的情绪状态和文化叙事。
  • 大脑通过分层情感和感官信息来构建这些图形。
  • 看到怪物可能反映出潜意识正在应对未解决的恐惧。

睡眠瘫痪症可以治疗吗?

介绍了一种通过在发作期间重新情境化和重新引导注意力来治疗睡眠瘫痪的潜在治疗方法。 

  • 睡眠瘫痪期间的认知重新评估可以通过改变对体验的看法来减轻恐惧。
  • 关注积极的情感意象可以减少消极的体验。
  • 初步研究表明,采用这种方法可以减少50%的睡眠瘫痪发作。

梦境与预言之间有联系吗?

探讨了梦境作为预言的可能性,为未来事件或个人成长提供见解。

  • 预言梦可能与个人通过直觉预见未来事件的能力有关。
  • 一个人梦想的深度和复杂程度可以随着个人的成长而发展。

宗教在理解恶意方面扮演什么角色?

宗教叙事和框架如何帮助个人应对恶意和深刻痛苦的概念。

  • 宗教框架提供了处理恶意概念的元策略。
  • 深刻的创伤常常需要宗教语言和叙述来理解。

Edit:2025.03.28

讨论列表 AKP讨论 查看原帖及回帖