Participant #1:
From the Hill country in Texas, broadcasting worldwide. This is one radio Network.com. Well, a very, very pleasant good morning to you. It's about 1130 Central Time. Oneradonetwork.com hope you enjoyed a little visit we had with you this morning. And now one of our favorite guys could very intelligent and wonderful man. And his name is Dr. Ray Pete. He's here on the third Monday of each month. And as you know, our telephones are out, but we are able to figure out a way how to get them plugged in with a little headset. So he may sound different, but who cares? We're going to be able to hear him and he can hear me. And that pretty much is really what counts. If you go to his website, Raypet.com, he has a great section of articles you can get on his newsletter. His approach, as he writes here, gives a priority to environmental influences on development, regenerative processes and the evolutionary perspective. He has done a great deal of work with hormones over the years. Phd in biology from the University of Oregon, specialized in physiology, and he taught in different schools. He started his work with progesterone and related hormones in a great deal about the thyroid. He gets so many thyroid questions and hormones, so he's really fungi to talk to. And Dr. Pete, thank you for being on the show. Good morning. Good morning. How is your life? What's you doing up there in the Northwest? Are you behaving yourself? Yeah. Staying indoors because of the bad weather? Reading a lot. Yeah. What are you reading? I just got RFK Juniors book on fauxy couple. It's a very, very big book full of about a couple of thousand references and most of the stuff that I have ran across over the last 40 years. But it's a tremendously detailed review of the government's position in public health and especially Faucey's role in it. I've read that he really has an incredible amount of references. Right. I mean, you really want to do a lot of work with this thing, didn't you? Yeah, I think he has about 20 researchers organizing the references. People are denouncing it because they don't like what he concludes, but no one has apparently found any fly in it. And 400 pages of detailed description of events in the government and science. You would think the critics could find some little fact to say was wrong, but they don't I don't know if he's getting any kind of exposure on the whole mainstream press. Do you know? Yeah, there have been several Associated Press and all of the leading publications. I have employed banks of reporters to try
Participant #1:
to find something wrong with it. What are some of the ideas that you feel are probably most kind of poking people in the eye that they don't like
Participant #1:
the actual history of the government being involved with the profit making motive behind the so called vaccines? David Martin, going through the history of patents regarding vaccines shows that going back more than 15 years, you can find that they were planning to do this sort of thing more than 15 years ago. These Fike protein and the antibodies that are formed in response to the spike protein, both of these were shown to destroy a lung tissue 15 years ago. So the craziest thing in the world would be to ignore that even the antibodies to spike protein kill lung tissue. So the whole concept of an RNA based vaccine against the spiked protein, there's everything wrong with it and nothing right with it, except that you can create a vaccine, so called, in a few weeks. We're ordinary to actually biologically so that you've got an immune reaction. It takes years, on average, about ten years to make a vaccine. It works, at least against the virus you're starting with. But this one was never shown to work against any virus. No virus.
Participant #1:
Can he prove that it was just meant to do something other than what's good for the body? Yeah. If you look at the actual research around 2005, you see that they had explained why the spike protein is harmful and why the antibodies to it are harmful. When we form an antibody to something outside the body that gives us a mirror image protein that locks like a lock and key into the Anderson. But having formed these antibodies, our body recognizes the novelty of this duly formed antibody and forms antibodies against that antibody. And the second generation antibody is an exact copy as close as biologically possible to the original toxic. Androgen so every time we react to any harmful androgen next two steps away from that, we are creating a copy of the harmful androgen and these waves of antibodies against antibodies are expensive. They occupy our immune apparatus. And so repeated exposure to different things, even so called good vaccines. If you give 50 different Anderson to a person during development, you are occupying a huge amount of their immune system. But you're only doing it for the superficial level of antibodies. Every time you specialize in a new kind of antibody, you're spending your potential, but only you're investing in the possibility that you will confront that particular threat again. So you're investing in the past anyway. And that has to do with the accumulated damage of aging in Africa because of poor diet and exposure to lots of parasites and infections, a warm, humid climate, lots of fungal infections. These things are occupying their immune system over and over again is a burden on the immune system, explaining why the incidence of acquired immune deficiency is so high when the environment is rich in diseases. So that is why this whole Age thing got so prevalent in the early 80s in Africa, because of the environment. But there wasn't really ever, was there, Dr. Peter? An Age virus that was isolated and shown and really existed as advertised, in a sense. But in Africa. They didn't find that. And so they redefined the existence of AIDS as having the infections that typify people with AIDS. Tuberculosis is very common in age infected people. And you see lots of TB in Africa every time you identify a new tuberculosis patient, by definition, that has become an AIDS victim. Wow. It's just a matter of definition. So they actually changed the definition or categorization of people dying from AIDS, but not really because they couldn't find this virus and never really.
Participant #1:
Yeah. Peter Duch has been writing about this. He was the world's leading virologist in the but as soon as he questioned this idea that there is an AIDS causing virus, as soon as he questioned that, he was exiled scientifically, not invited to science meetings, not given any grants, ruined, just ended his career totally. Wow. And one of the stories that I hadn't heard before, I think it was in Kennedy's book, is that well known medical researcher contacted him by phone and said he wanted to talk to him across the country to have dinner with him. And after having separate with him, it pulled out
Participant #1:
a research article supposedly underg's name Dewsburg had nothing to do with writing it, but said, if you take responsibility and say this is your work, you're back in the science establishment simply by saying, I hereby acknowledged the existence of an AIDS virus, and he turned it down and just stayed in exile. Does Kennedy go into it? And do you know how many so many people did die during this whole thing of who knows what were the problem similar to what the injections are today, Dr. P, the drugs that they gave these kids from the diagnosis AIDS? Yes, sir. Peter Dersberg makes a good case that it was at first recreational drugs that were very popular in the homosexual community. And then after pausing, became involved of non researched or fraudulently researched chemicals to supposedly treat the infection turned out to be deadly. And Bluesberg goes through that history, that when the death rate from the recreational drugs was tapering off. The pharmaceutical antiretroviral agents coming on the market took over, killing the patients. Wow. So the act what they gave all the patients when they were diagnosed with having this AIDS virus. Right. Do we know what the tests were like? Was it similar to this PCR test back then? Do we know to diagnose people with this alleged virus? Yes. The PCR didn't come into use until just about a year after the HIV was supposed to be identified. Yeah. But this was the work, too, that Kerry Mullis, who did invent the PCR, he was looking into this. Right. And I've seen videos where he says I couldn't find any virus. That's right. The existence of the virus was thoroughly established according to how to go under government before the PCR test existed. And when it did exist, Carrie Malice, as I said, there's no basis for claiming that we're talking with. Dreat.com. If you have a question, Doctorpat.com. Sorry. Let me get the right. Sometimes I mess it up. Raypet.com is what it is. Raypet.com, if you care to join us. I'm sorry, just [email protected]. So before we get off this subject, so in general, are there similar issues going on with all of these 50 some vaccines they give the kids and the money and the pharmaceutical companies and the government. Are there some real problems with these as well, from birth? Oh, they vary. Each one has its own toxicity and there's a tremendous variation in those. But when you add up all of the reported deaths from the preexisting vaccines, the deaths reported from the new Socalled vaccines, something like 100 times more than from all of the existing vaccines added together for the last ten years. There were several of the standard so called vaccines that were very toxic, like for the Papillomavirus, fairly toxic, the anti tetanus shot. Others were almost harmless, but still, they were all a burden system and adding up even these things, which were only about 1% as harmful as the present RNA virus at vaccines, when you add up these relatively harmless things, then you see a tremendous increase in allergies, not a wave of deaths in middle aged and younger people, but allergies developing in childhood. So it's about 50 times as many allergic kids and young people as before.
Participant #1:
Vaccines were really pushed. Yeah. We talked with a gentleman, Dr. Pete, who did a whole huge study about this and the health of kids who were not vaccines and the health of kids who were vaccine. Like you're saying, it was an incredible study. And boy, they just threw him out of the medical association and closed his practice. And boy, they didn't want to hear it. They didn't want to hear any of it. Amazing. The hepatitis B vaccine was shown to cause lingering brain damage in animal studies, and they give it to little kids as if everyone was going to be exposed to sexually transmitted hepatitis or to contaminated intravenous drugs. No. The theoretically harmless measles, mumps, rubella, they just give the kids Cohen and others argue that they really do mess up the innate immune system. And what you're saying is that's been proven, then the kids will get whatever ear infections and all kinds of stuff. Yeah. For example, there's evidence that the kids who had normal measles are relatively resistant to developing cancer later in life. Just go ahead and have the measles. Yeah. After they have less cancer. Wow. My goodness. What a thing. How do we get into this whole vaccine paradigm anyway? When I was a kid, what, 60 years ago or 70 for going to say they weren't giving us a whole load, were they? I don't remember getting a bunch of vaccines. No.
Participant #1:
My parents just got their information from newspapers and radios and magazines and so on. And still there was enough evidence already to indicate that vaccines were very questionable as a preventive or as a harmless measure. Starting fairly early at the beginning of the 20th century, there was evidence that injecting anything intramuscularly, anything irritating, especially predisposed kids, to getting paralysis of the area that received the injection. So if it went in the right hip, that leg was more likely to develop polio paralysis or the left shoulder, that left arm was much more likely to become paralyzed. That has been reported now for over 100 years. My goodness. And there were very well publicized studies in the 1950 pretty well turned everyone who is at all informed against the vaccines. And that effect of the area affected by polio is still seen in Africa today. The frequency of paralysis of a particular part of the body corresponds closely to the site of vaccination. Do they still give polio vaccines today? Yeah, currently, I think most of it is called the vaccine derived polio paralysis, very specifically related to the virus given in the vaccines. Yes, sir. Okay, we're going to take a little break here. Dr. Pete, stay right there. Thanks for he's got a headset on. Our phones are out, as you know, and we worked that over the weekend. And thanks for doing that, sir. This is Patrick Timpone, oneradionetwork.com many people have said and we concur that the number one investment we should make is in our health. It was George Wiseman last caller. I'm sorry, I didn't remember his name said investment. And this is really the investment kind of thing that you need to do. Not my machine specifically. I think I sell the world's best machine, and I do my best to maintain it and support the customers and everything. But regardless of who you get it from, you really should invest in your health. You're going to enjoy life. If you haven't got health, how are you going to fulfill that bucket list? So number one on the bucket list should be your health, and then you get some extra years. I say this thing not only adds years to your life because the science is showing a 30 to life extension. So I'm expecting to go to the 120 50 years old and help a lot of people between now and then. But it also adds life to your years. There's no sense living in your last decade of life if you're in a hospital bed on attached to machines. You know what I mean? Throwing a Frisbee and having fun. It's so true, isn't it? Boy, we don't feel good and have the energy to do what we need to do. What's the point? And here's an investment with a lifetime warranty and also a one year, no questions asked money back guarantee. If you don't want it, check out this Aquacure machine. Bubbling hydrogen gas, drinking it, breeding it. This is real cutting edge technology. Check it out. In our store, use promo code one radio for 10% discount the aquacur brownsgasmachine oneradonetwork.com. One of the very first things I do in the morning is come sit at my meditation chair. And that's when I take my dual extracted mushrooms from Survival, the Chaga and the reishi. Both of these mushrooms are immunomodulators. If you had too strong of an immune system like autoimmunity, it'll help to down regulate and calm the immune system. If you have too weak of an immune system like an immunodeficiency, they help to upregulate or strengthen your immune system. So whatever you're dealing with, they help to bring your immune system to balance. In addition to being immunomodulators and adaptogens, Chaga is probably best known for its extremely high ORAC value or antioxidant content. It scavenges the body of free radicals. And Reishi has a long history being used in conjunction with meditation and for reaching higher States of consciousness. And that's why I like to take these right before my meditation. There's a lot of medicinal mushroom supplements on the market to choose from, but most are made with cheaply produced mushrooms grown on grain and either ground up and put in capsules or extracted in nonorganic alcohol. Survival does it differently. We use wild harvested Chaga and organic certified wood grown reishi fruit bodies, not the mycelial extract. And then we use an organic alcohol and a hot water extraction method and then recombined. So you get the full benefits of these extremely high quality mushrooms. It's a great company and we love Daniel and his work. And it's just been such an honor over the years to work with him and sell his products. One of our favor, the pine pollen here, and it will keep your testosterone up levels up as my tests that you have seen will
Participant #1:
substantiate. And then, oh, this is a good one. Here. We got some CBD oil from Danube Italus and what else do I got here? Well, that's about it right here in front of me. Oh, the digestive bitters is a nice thing for digestion digestive bitters. Spray that puppy on there. So it's a good company. Colostrum, great company. Let us know if we can provide you any information with it. And I think you'll really enjoy the sister Thrival products. Try the cluster. I put it in my smoothies and I think you'll have enough great experience. I just wanted to mention if I could go back about 60 seconds and talk about George Wiseman and the hydrogen machine. After two and a half years, my hydrogen machine just stopped. And these things happen. They're machines. And it was just amazing. I just emailed George. He said, don't worry. He said, I'll send you out a new machine and all you got to do is just take the machine that I send you, put your old machine back in there, post it paid. You can call ups and have them pick it up or bring it to them and you're done. And that's the way he works. So there is a lifetime warranty on the hydrogen machine and a one year, no questions asked money back guarantee. I don't know anybody. And George is very careful about doing everything that he's agreed to do with these warranties. And he's a good guy. So I was missing it, man. I tell you what. So check it out. It's hydrogenmachine on oneradionetwork.com
Participant #1:
broadcasting from the beautiful Hill country in Texas. This is oneradionetwork.com
Participant #1:
if I can do that. Okay. Well, Dr. Pete, I want to ask you about this. We had a gentleman on our show, doctor, an MD, written about ten books, and he was talking about how that he believed that the research shows, if you look at anthropologists and such, that grains are really not good for us. And he kind of presented the argument that grains and sugar are really the problems behind heart disease and such. So let me ask you about that. Are grains okay, in your opinion, did you say Greens or grains? Grains. Grains. Sorry. I know you have a hard time with this new system. Grains? Yeah, like grains. Like everything. Grains. Grains. If they're properly prepared, they're fine. Thousands of years ago, people, I guess, cooking around an open fire, found that if they got Ashes, wood Ashes into their cooking wheat or corn or whatever their cereal was, it tasted better and it was better for their health, easier to digest, more nutritious. And it's now called generally it's called mixture molization. Yes, sir. And you told us about this right next to molization of the corn in Mexico. And we can do this? Yeah, it tastes very good and it's very digestible and highly nutritious. The toxins of the grain are mostly removed or destroyed by the Alkali. At the same time, tryptophane, which in itself leads to a promotion of serotonin and inflammation. The tryptophane, which is a potential toxin, is converted to niacin. Amide, which is one of the signs of eating corn unprocessed is the deficiency disease of niacin. People who use the next stomalized corn don't get that deficiency disease because it gives you a very abundant source of myosin amide. And the removal of the polyunsaturated fats is part of it. They subpodify. A very large proportion of them become soap, like in the presence of the calcium hydroxide lime. And in the saponified form, they wash out and are thrown away or added to chicken food or whatever for extra calories. But it's simply reducing the proof of content of the grain is a very important thing. So the niximalization of corn has been used in traditional in South America and Mexico for a long time. People just kind of knew it. They figured it out, passed it along to generations. And in Asia, other grains, including wheat, were processed in the same way. And people have experimented, trying out maybe a dozen different types of grain, saying that they all are improved in flavor and detestability by the process. So could this doctor be accurate? If you're just pulling a white rice or a wheat or a bread or something off the shelf that these things are not good for you. Yeah. The storage protein, not to mention the proof, the saponified proofa is an inhibitor of protein digestion. And so any protein that is in the ordinary grain is very poorly digested because the proof is one of the plants protective toxins to discourage the consumption of their seeds. Because wheat and they're really seeds, aren't they? They're really seeds of the grass, right? Yeah. And when a person detests the storage protein gluten, for example, gluten is somewhat worse than the other storage proteins. But the sense of storing its nitrogen, which is being stored in a concentrated form. And if you sprout the grain, let it turn into a bit of vegetable rather than a starchy cereal that converts a potentially toxic, nitrogen rich compound into an actual protein that has nutritional value. So if it's unsprouted and unprocessed by Alkali, those storage proteins, especially combined with polyunsaturated fats, make it practically useless. Nutritionally so called protein value just isn't there in practice. It's there analytically. But since our animal digestion is blocked by these agents themselves, they are very poor. You're talking about, in a sense, if you're going to do rice, I don't know, oats or some or any steel cut, well, you can't sprout oats, I guess, but can you sprout like just white organic rice? And then that would turn it into a usable, not harmful food. If it has been processed, making it flight, you've probably removed the germ and you'll get some if it hasn't been heated, just soaking it, you'll activate some enzymes that reduce the toxins.
Participant #1:
If it hasn't been heated, will sprout. But you have to check that the grain is vital because they're often sterilized chemically or heated, and that prevents the enzyme activation that makes them safer. So in general, we have to really be creative. Otherwise, most of the grains that we're consuming are either worthless or could be causing inflammation of the gut and things. Yeah. About 50 years ago, there was some good studies of comparing the protein in rice. Just from the analysis, it would look like it was a fair source. But when you compare it to the protein quality of cooked Greens, spinach or kale, for example, the quality of the protein in the leaf is much higher, similar to milk protein than the grain, such that while there might be six or 7% chemically analytically in some of these feeding experiments, hardly more than zero protein. When you compare it to leaf protein that ranks similar to milk or meat in quality. What if you wanted to use like a really ancient wheat, like Hind corn, which is supposed to be pretty good stuff, would you have to sprout it before making bread to make it worthwhile? Yeah, much better when it has been soaked, make sourdough or even starting the sprouting process. But the ancient grains generally seemed kind of meager, not plump with starch. And that meant that the protein and mineral value is a lot higher, and that's good. I see. So am I hearing you say the more. The more modern grains, after hybridization or whatever has been a lot of the gluten problems and not maybe the ancient ones as much? The ancient grains? Yeah, they're bigger and have more Sharks and gluten, but those are not beneficial in general. So this guest idea that the starch, I guess he's talking about the starch out of the grains could be a contributor towards heart disease or heart problems.
Participant #1:
There have been a series going back about 100 years of studies showing that if you put in, especially raw starch, you can purify the starch. Corn starch, potato starch. Each has a characteristic granule size, ranging from five Mitrons in diameter to 100 Mitrons in diameter. And if you give a good feeding, maybe a stomach tube to put a lot of starch in at once and then sample the animals bloodstream. It's liver fluids. It's cerebrospinal fluids, the urine, all of the body fluids. Every 15 minutes, you find it first going into the bloodstream and from there to the brain and from the blood into the urine. Finally, even though they are large particles approaching and even much bigger than a red blood cell, these particles, unchanged as far as can be seen, will go from the intestine right into the circulating body fluids. And that's not good. When they reach a capillary or a small arterial that they're too big to go ahead. And so when they slice up, for example, after they've been fed that way, they found that their bodies and brains are full of little areas of dead tissue. Every place a grain particle clogged an arterial that surrounding tissue died for lack of oxygen and nutrients.
Participant #1:
Same procedure has been tested in medical students. They're giving them a glass, a slurry of corn starch or potato starch. And then every 15 minutes, they're drawing blood or checking their urine, and you can centrifuge the blood or urine and find the characteristic size and form of the starch granules that they were fed.
Participant #1:
You can decrease the effect if you take the fat in a well cooked form and with butter or cream to slow the absorption. And if your parastolsis is very active, for example, if you take it with coffee, more of them go through into your bloodstream. So something is always happening to some extent. But the more the starch is cooked and eaten with a balanced diet, including milk, milk, butter. So that would be. Why would you say then a wellcooked potato with butter is pretty good? Better than it's okay. Yeah. Really well cooked, right? Yeah. Meaning that they started, which reaches about Fahrenheit 211, deg
Participant #1:
completely. It cooked. Takes about an hour of baking a potato. Yeah. So then that turns to starch into something else, into a chemically softened search. That's much easier to test. So if we're just going out and getting, say, an organic rice, whether it be Bosma or organic Brown rice from California and doing nothing, could that cause these particles from the starch and the rice to be not good for a heart possible. Right. And the polyunsaturated fats in the rice in the unprocessed rice. The reason the Chinese developed the Polishing process to make white rice is that much of the oil in the Bran and a germ are removed, gone. There's nothing much left to get rented. So polished white rice is less allergenic and less cumulative toxicity. So that's why they've been able to see why rice in China for whatever for so long, because they get rid of the poop is and other things that can get oxidized. Yeah. It's more like eating sugar.
Participant #1:
Can you actually take some of this white rice? It's so common, say, in China and get it here? That's been everything's been taken off. Dr. Pete, if you put that in there, would that sprout? Could you sprout that at all overnight? Would it do anything
Participant #1:
if it hasn't been heated? There will still be some vital enzymes that will break down the starch and protein. So is that the process of sprouting? You're breaking down this starch and protein why people sprout different things. That's what's going on. Yeah. And it helps to eliminate the proof. The proofa. Because there's proof is in these grains. Right. And that's what gets ranched so quickly in the whole drain. Wow.
Participant #1:
Having whole grains rather than white flour, it's true that they contain much more mineral value, but still there are a risk for the rancid fats. For the rancid fats because they got them in there because they've not been polished out. Correct. Right. Wow. This guest recommended that people could do a test. I wanted to ask you about this NMR lipoprotein panel. Are you familiar with this? Mmr, yes, sir. Nuclear magnetic resonance. I don't know about a particular blood test. It's supposed to show the different sized particles of the different cholesterol and things like that in there. But you've not heard of this one. Mmr. Oh, it actually measures the number of small LDL particles.
Participant #1:
Yeah. The smaller particles get rancid much more quickly because their surface is greater in relation to the. Wow. So we don't want small LDL particles. We want big ones, big puffy ones. Yeah. There's a close connection between heart health and egg eating helps to keep the particles big. And so eggs have a heart protective effect in reducing the number of ultra small fat particles. Interesting. So in general, we kind of put together the idea if the particles are big, they could clog up things, but it's just the opposite because of the rancidity factor. Yeah. The bigger particles are much less exposed to the oxygen. Wow. That's pretty cool. So in the heart disease and the smaller starchy kind of things, they get into arteries, and then that causes a problem. That's what's causing my cause myocardial infarctions as well.
Participant #1:
That hasn't been as directly and clearly shown. But the starches
Participant #1:
do cause vascular damage. Yeah. And that triggers immunological changes. Yes. The damage makes you have a general systemic allergic reaction to the starches or the grains that come from. And that would contribute to your heart and heart damage. And then that could also call in the cholesterol. And also what comes after the cholesterol, something another substance to try to smooth things out. And that could cause build up of these things in the arteries because of the infection. Yeah. The cholesterol involves in detoxifying the polyunsaturated fatty acids that cause oxidative damage to the lining of the artery. The cholesterol temporarily reduces inflammation and should, over time, gradually reduce the damage. But if you keep eating, you keep damaging the arteries. And the proof combines
Participant #1:
and gets overloaded in the tissue. So you get a plaque of what's really half and half proof and half cholesterol. Wow. And then that's where the calcium might come in, too, to try to try to patch things up. Once the tissue is damaged, the calcium tends to take it out of action. So this is one of the reasons why you've been such an advocate of getting proof of out of your life. Right. Right. A big part of it and the information goes back close to 100 years
Participant #1:
was when they really started thinking about what's going on with age treatment. In the 1940s, it was clearly established that proofa increase, accelerates H, pigment formation and all of the degenerative processes. And turns out that vitamin E slows that process. And that was involved in not only selling vitamin E as a protective antioxidant, which isn't its exclusive function. It functions as an anti inflammatory agent and as an anti estrogen. But once they could show there was an antioxidant that took over, and they didn't talk anymore about the antiinflammatory anti estrogen effect because estrogen was being sold as a protective thing rather than a promoter of age fitment and tissue damage. Would that be an argument for most of us or some of us or all of us to do some vitamin E regularly just to good for you. Reasonable? I think so. These studies over the years have got different results, but it's because what is called vitamin E has been redefined for a time. It was defined as substance that increased fertility by opposing estrogen. That was turned into simply an antioxidant. And then the manufacturer became very low in the anti escalatory fat and tended to have more fatty acids, polyunsaturated fats. Right. In the vitamin E product. During those years, vitamin E supplements tended to increase mortality because they were actually selling antivitamin E mixed in with the vitamin E. But when you look at the nature of the substance you're talking about, then, yes, vitamin E is very protective. And then. Go ahead. Go ahead. It probably only takes about 30 to 50 milligrams per day to give you full protection. And what should we look for? If our listeners want to find a vitamin E to take every day, what would be in a product? What would you look for? Fair amount of viscosity and dark color and high potency in the smallest volume. You don't want a big clear capsule like a huge one. Diluted. Yeah. To get the most I use for the smaller the capsule. Right. So you get less proof, though. You get less proof. But would you do a mixed what do they call tocopherols whatever that is? Mixed one. Yes. Those are the anti inflammatory components. And what are these things made out of? These vitamins. Where do they come from? Plants make them as regulatory signal materials. Very interesting. Wow. Well, that's good information. So again, on the potatoes, they're okay. You just need to Cook them a lot. Really Cook them well. And put butter on them. Right. Right. Butter. Okay. Cream is okay. And then on the grains. Now there is a company there's a company that you can get Nixtimalized corn. So I have some of that. That's really nice. You can find it online. Just Google it. But then anything else? If you're going to do wheat, even the ancient wheat, you'd probably want to try to sprout it first. Maybe if you can. Yeah. And it isn't hard to mix them. It takes maybe an hour extra. Really. So you're using lime. Yeah. Calcium hydroxide. Calcium hydroxide. And you can maximalize pretty much anything, as far as I know. People have told me that they've used parley and some of the old fossil grains. Interesting. Do you do this, if you don't mind me asking for your own grains, you use calcium hydroxide if you're going to eat it. What was the first question? Do you do this for yourself if you're going to eat some kind of grains? I've done that, but I usually just buy the Masa prepared. Yeah. The Niximalized. Yeah. Pretty cool. Very interesting. Interesting. Let's take a few emails here. Good morning. My question for Dr. Pete is if the worst comes to be in this crazy world, what would you do to survive without a thyroid? Oh, they don't have a thyroid. Haven't been radiated. Would there be a way to survive or just die a slow, happy death? Thank you. They don't have to die without a thyroid, do they? Doctor Pete, you can theoretically at least make it yourself if you, for example, boil milk with oysters in it or seaweed, a source of iodine and trace minerals. The prolonged boiling will create iodine, which in effect, works like thyroid hormone. You can make it right in your kitchen. If it happened that you weren't able to buy Cyrus in a pharmacological form. Well, that's fascinating. So you're actually cooking oysters and milk is what you say. Oysters and milk. Yeah. The reaction between minerals casein. And iodine will produce an active thyroid like substance. Fascinating. Now, if I understand, though, too, you're not a fan of just taking no matter what kind, just iodine, right? No. It's so easy to overdose, and lots of people have a strange allergy like reaction to add an iodine or iodine. No one really understands what is going on. It's some peculiar immune system, but it's fairly common. What would those reactions present themselves as with too much iodine? Just getting very sick. Headaches, constipation or diarrhea, arthritis, pains. And the studies I've seen about 70 different studies of the addition of iodide to salt. If you have three or four times more than the daily requirement of iodine taken in through iodized salt. Over the years, the risk of hypothyroidism and thyroid cancer greatly increase. So on the population basis, Theody salt has been higher. I'm full to public health. Wow. And that's all pretty much most everybody eats, right? The I dye salt from the blue container. Yeah. Most of the salt in the store, I think, is iodized. If you're in iodine deficient area. There are areas in the Andes and Mexico and around the Great Lakes that have traditionally been deficient in iodine, and so it's okay in those regions. But some studies found that when iodide was being used as a dough conditioner, the average American was getting about ten times more iodine than desirable if they ate bread. I see. There's a gentleman that emailed earlier that he had Achilles heel problem and they had to operate and they loaded him up with antibiotics. He did, let's see Ancef IVs for three weeks. And he wanted me to ask you how he can kind of repopulate everything down there, repopulate his microbiome thing. Sometimes the bacteria in yogurt help doesn't hurt. For example, the Greek yogurt has reduced lactic acid content, but still it's full of the anti inflammatory bacteria. It's probably a safe addition to the diet. That's a real thick Greek yogurt. Yeah. Erin writes in, I thought drinking Orange juice caused an insulin spike, and it was my understanding that an insulin spike was a bad thing. What spike? Insulin spike. Insulin. Drinking Orange juice.
Participant #1:
Yeah. If you don't take it with other food, but just slowing down the absorption with milk, for example, will moderate that insulin spike. And if you compare it to rice, sucrose in your Orange juice contains an insulin moderating component that the fructose slightly inhibits the release of insulin compared to rice or corn starch, which breaks down into pure glucose, lacking the moderating effect of fructose. So when you look at the glycemic index, the starch is at the top of the list, and sucrose is well down the list because the fructose has a moderating effect. And also the high potassium content, for instance, has a moderating effect. But you mentioned that. Do you want to always drink it with something else, or is it okay on its own? If you drink it slowly. Okay. Don't go down 8oz at once. But
Participant #1:
if there are four oranges in a glass of juice, just split it out over time as if you're eating the whole Orange. I see. It makes sense. Dr. Ray Pete is with us. Patrick Tim, Pony July January 17 Excuse me, Mary says Dr. Pete, I have a low thyroid. How can I get armored thyroid from a pharmacy in Mexico? Or is there something better to take than Armor thyroid? I guess she's in Mexico. It's very hard to get in Mexico as well as being expensive. But almost all of the drugstores in Mexico will have two. Forbes of a compound that includes T three and T four. C two plus contains the ratio that Armor thyroid. In fact, they designed the product to be equivalent to four to one rate ratio of T four to T three. And then another product called no photo, five to one ratio. And it's pretty good. So if you just go out and get an Armor or nature Thorate or whatever from pharmacy, it's about a four to one. T four to T three in general. Yeah. The natural plan actually varies from three to one to four to one. Okay, pretty close. So the Cino plus, which you can get into a Mexican pharmacy is four to one. So that would be a reasonable replacement, right? Yeah, it works almost identically. Okay,
Participant #1:
here's an interesting email. In Science News. In 2003, the exosomes used as vaccine carriers were already proved to shed so much so that they were called a kind of biological FedEx. Is this shedding why the vaccinated are causing more death than the unvaccinated? Yeah, the phenomenon of shedding through our breath, sweat, urine, saliva. It's going on all the time. And Pfizer was fully aware of that and warned their team of vaccinators not to let pregnant women or breastfeeding women get exposed to someone who had been vaccinated. So that knowledge, going back at least ten or 15 years, was fully known by Pfizer, who put it in their instructions in the very beginning when they were testing the vaccines. So folks that are getting this alleged covet injection, what are they shedding in their sweat, in their breath? What are they shedding? Just like everyone is shedding everything. Natural proteins, RNA, DNA, lipids, a little bit of all chemistry. We shed this all the time. Right. Just by breathing. Yeah. You put a cold piece of metal under your nose and fluid condenses on it. Then you analyze that and you find surprisingly big stuff, the exosomes free pieces of RNA free pieces of DNA, very complex. So what do you suppose that's about? Spiritually or philosophically or evolutionary? Why are we putting out these exosomes all the time? I think it's a form of biological cooperation, like bacteria, even bacteria of different categories. If one group has been exposed to an antibiotic and survived, they will develop a bit of DNA that specifies how to make a detoxifier to the antibiotic, and they will join up with other bacteria, even of different species, and transmit their DNA instructions right through a little tube so the new species can figure it out their knowledge. So if bacteria learned somehow to cooperate with each other and improve their survival, I think all of the higher levels are doing it constantly that we're sampling our environment in this genetic composition, and our organism probably most of the time, is checking it to see if it has anything useful. And occasionally some harmful material comes in instead. So if we get some exosomes in from others out in the store that are not useful, it's not harmful to us generally. Yeah. There's a lot in Germany that has found all of our food substances, DNA, in our bloodstream and tissue, and some of them are actually incorporated into our own genomes. I didn't quite understand that. So what are the company doing in Germany with the food? If you eat beef, you can find some beef genetic material circulating in your blood. Yes. And then if you culture some of the animals tissues, occasionally you can find that some of DNA has made its way under the nucleus and become part of us. There's evidence
Participant #1:
toxic algae can deliver its toxic DNA to our system and become incorporated. There is some suggestion of a toxic effect being picked up from certain organisms, but also the possibility that we can use that material constructively. So in a sense, though, is it possible if we are around injected people with these, which we believe are very dangerous things, that we could learn from it or deal with it or not so much. I think if you look at the mortality around the different countries in relation to their continuing vaccination processes, I think what's happening is that we recalling the shedding phenomenon and the vaccination delivery of the toxins. We're calling that an epidemic. I think the epidemic is really long past. What we're having is echoing of the shedding effect and the new vaccination damaging or resistance. And no telling whatever test they're using is picking up. Right. There's just no telling, is there? Yeah. They have failed to demonstrate the meaning of the tests are given. Yes, sir. So all these new cases that we see in the news, it's just not relevant, is it, Doctor Pete? Relevant as far as spreading some kind of a mysterious thing, carry Mellis observations, I think are still relevant. You spin it enough, it'll pick about up anything I think is words. Right. The CT, the circulation threshold.
Participant #1:
Yeah. What you have to do is show a causal relation between your test and symptoms, which hasn't really been done, has it? No. Maryland writes in, what would you do for a child with a fever, cough and throwing up? What do you consider to be dangerous high temperatures, and how would you treat it aspirin and all of the antiinflammatory things. Sugar has really been neglected as an antiinflammatory thing. It reduces stress, lowers the stress hormones, and reduces the inflammatory cytokines. Sugar do the damage. Sugar, sugar great. But they didn't teach us that for the last 30 years. They told us sugar was going to kill us, right? Yeah. But sugar corresponds pretty well to the production of carbon dioxide. And if something stress causes us to shift from glucose oxidation to fatty acid oxidation, that lowers the CO2 production and increases lactic acid production, which supports all of the inflammatory problems. So getting your CO2 up by maintaining glucose oxidation should be a basic thing. So when we sell sugar, it could be anything from organic beet sugar or Maple syrup or honey or Orange juice or fruit. Honey and Orange juice are very good. The Maple syrup, the Brown stuff, is fairly inflammatory material in itself. Oh, the dark stuff. I thought the darker was, the better. No. Well, it does correspond to mineral content, but also there are amino acids which heated in the presence of the sugar. You get a toxic reaction between amino acid and glucose that's Brown. So the Browning of food tends to increase its allergenicity. I thought they just got the Maple syrup out of the tree and that's it. But no, they Cook it. Yeah. You have to boil it for a long time. Same with cane sugar. If you just choose a stick of cane, you have a very nice Amber colored solution, which is very safe. But if you Cook it long enough to get black molasses, the reaction between amino acids and sugars are allergenic or toxic. So if you like Maple syrup, you want to try to find a light one. That's the least processed. Right. Wow. I can remember when I spent some time in Hawaii, they used to have these carts, Dr. Pete, on the road, and they would just have the raw cane sugar. Right. And they would juice it right there and you could have a glass of that. It was pretty fun right there on the side of the road. Yeah. I think it's very good juice. Very good for you. Wow. This is interesting. Can Dr. Pete discuss how hazardous raw and undercooked starches, like the presorption of raw starch, a cause of sineal, dementia and many other studies. Wow. This person has done some research. So what would be like a raw starch? An undercooked starch. What would that be?
Participant #1:
Most people don't like to Cook their rice until it's gummy, for example. They like some separation of the kernels until it's governed. You're still going to have some of the risky particles. Wow. So that would be an undercook would just be rice. And then when we get that starch, that undercooked starch, what are the dangers? What goes on there? If you aren't having it with fat and if you eat a lot of it regularly, then I think you have the risk that they saw in their experimental animals of premature dementia. Wow. Goes to the brain. It's just something starts messing with the brain. Yeah. The arterials that get plugged by a starch granule. Everything downstream from that arterial gets deprived of nutrition and is likely to die. That's not good in general. Guess even organic Brown rice, pasta or pasta could be a challenge to eat, right? Yeah. I think pasta and rice and such things should be boiled for at least 40 minutes. Could you imagine cooking pasta for 40 minutes? It would just be all gum. Wouldn't it just be all gum? That's right.
Participant #1:
But I guess you could take some organic, I don't know, iron corn and then sprout the weed and make your own or something like that would be okay, I guess. Right. What does think of tocotrino vitamin E versus mixed tocopherols role in the poof of toxicity. So we have tocotrino vitamin E versus mixed tocopherols. I would go with the tocopherol pressure, but in feeding experiments the tocotrienols cause liver enlargement if they gave very much of it. And that indicates some kind of a stress effect. I see from the Chinese here's a good one. Is dry vitamin E legitimate? Dirk Pearson and Sandy Shaw recommended back in 1982. I remember that book. Remember that? Pearson and Shaw book drive vitamin E. Any such thing? It does have some vitamin E value, but there is no dry vitamin E. No such thing. Sucks is sometimes sold that way as having special anti cancer effectors. Remember Derrick at one point was recommending rubbing Estherton into his scalp to make his hair grow. Yeah. Did it work? No, that didn't work. Got any ideas? Write an email for thinning hair. It seems to start after I had a plate and screws put in my wrist after it broke. So I guess this person had a little plate put in their wrist. Could that affect hair thinning? Could it affect what hair thinning? Thinning of hair
Participant #1:
conceivably. But the biological vitality of the scalp and the hair follicle
Participant #1:
corresponds. For example, low thyroid people tend to lose their hair and just increasing your metabolic rate will increase your ability to grow and retain hair. And so if something is causing constant stress, that could slow your metabolism and contribute to hair loss. Interesting. After all these years, have you ever seen any quality information on why the hairs tend to lose their color Gray? Why? That is many years ago when Boiseman, Colorado, Montana the rate of fight prematurely. Gray haired people seem very high in those very cold towns. And I decided that the stress of the skin was probably a factor. Radiation. Wouldn't person has dental xrays. The whisters will sometimes turn white in circular areas on the cheeks, a series of overlapping circles suggesting that the radiation was knocking out the ability to oxidize the pigment. Copper is both the respiratory catalyst and the pigment forming catalyst. So if you're copper deficient, you're going to tend to have white Gray hair as well as lower metabolizing, maybe more inflamed tissue. What do you think about drinking water out of a pure copper vessel from time to time? Do you think that's valuable?
Participant #1:
Yeah. Getting enough copper in relation to iron, I think is a protective factor for people who eat too much meat or other rich food are going to compete and displace the copper that is needed for energy production and pigment formation. And so meat like muscle meter, ribeye and T bones, that is fun to eat. That has a lot of iron.
Participant #1:
Yeah. As well as for most people, too much phosphate and too much tryptophane and other excitatory amino acids and too much heme. Everything that it provides too much of tends to support cancer development and degenerative processes. Wow. But I thought tryptophan is a sleepy time, you say? But it's excitatory or inflammatory in the meat.
Participant #1:
Yes. There are three acids that correlate with aging, degeneration and inflammation and loss of thyroid function, archionine, cystine and tryptophane. Wow. So chicken, beef, pork, any difference there? Yeah, a little bit. The red mussel beets have quite a bit more iron. So chicken a little bit easier on the body for the iron content. For the iron content anyway. And then how about fish in general? I think I remember I've been kind of beating. He said some of the best choices are scallops. You like scallops? Good choice. Probably number one. Number one.
Participant #1:
Scallops. Crab, stalamari, calamari.
Participant #1:
All of the crustaceans and mollusks are pretty good. Shrimp? Yeah. Shrimp. High copper in relation to iron. I see that copper that kind of turquoise color and the lobster and things. That's what you're getting. More copper there rather than iron. Interesting. Do people generally who eat a lot more fish wherever they live have better mortality rates than the heavy meat eaters in general? Yeah. I think part of it is the less iron content. And the low fat fish, I think are the best low fat fish. So other than let's see, salmon would be a high fat fish with a lot of threes. Right. Which you're not fans of Omega three s. Correct. Yeah. And shrimp and scallops on the other end. Cool. One more and then we'll let you go. I consume too much salt in a day. Sometimes the next morning my hands joints will be stiff with some pain or flexing. Any ideas on how to relieve perd? Some of that salt. Wow. Why would salt do that to this person's joints? Dr. Pete? Salt. Salt. Too much salt. They tend to get little creaky joints and pain in their hands when they eat too much salt. I don't know. I don't think I've ever heard that. Yeah, we've never heard of that one. But now, again, just to know, to repeat, your favorite, if I understand, is the PICC Morton's Picoline and Canning. Sold. Right. With no iodine. Right. It's very pure. Very pure stuff. Well, we covered a lot of territory here this morning. Thanks for all that information on the whole starch and grains thing, because we've been getting a lot of emails since we had this fellow on. So I think he was kind of on the right track, really. I mean, he was talking about generally in general, you didn't hear the show. Probably. But just commercial grains and could be a problem for a lot of people. Right. Just eating them. Yes. They aren't prepared properly. They aren't prepared properly. Dr. Pete, thank you. How's your newsletters coming? Do we have a new one soon? I'm going to write something about Tensor. I return to the subject about every five years or so. Oh, you do? Some of the things I've been working on for 20 or 30 years are just now starting to really take off as subjects of interest. That's great. Well, we look forward to that, sir. And you can get Ray Pete's newsletter by just emailing newsletter. Let's see. Plural pleats and newsletter. Right. Ray Petts [email protected], is that right? Yeah. And it's going to be four times a year rather than six times a year. And the subscription per year will be something around $10. Oh, my God. $10. Because PayPal charges almost 8% fee on $10, we're going to make a ten point $20. God love you. So you can get that, folks. That will be four times a year. [email protected]. Dr. Pete, as usual, it's just such an honor to have you. We would love talking to you. Did you enjoy the little headset thing? You think we should stay with it or get back to the phone next time? I understood almost everything you said. Well, you sound great. I mean, you sound much closer than on the phone. If you don't mind, we could try it again as long as you can hear me. Well, thanks a lot, sir. You take care of yourself. We appreciate it. Okay. Okay. Thank you. Thank you, sir. [email protected] and so that was great. Yeah. We were able to put this little thing together because we don't have the telephone thing going. We just can't do it.
Participant #1:
Well, that was great. Yeah. Good to get some really clarity on the whole grain thing because I've been thinking about that
Participant #1:
since Dr. Davis came on the show.
Participant #1:
Yeah. People are emailing me. What's the name of that website where you get the Nixtomalized corn? I'll have to look that up. I don't have it handy. But there is a website. I bought a bunch of it a big thing of it. And
Participant #1:
so there if you want a grain, it's already been mixed and wise, but then you can also do it yourself. We'll have to look into that calcium hydroxide. So we're going to talk to Bridge and see if she will sprout her on corn, even take it to another level before she makes bread. But he did say that the oncorn and these ancient wheats are very easier in general for the whole digestion process, which is pretty fun. Okay, kids, we will see you tomorrow. We're going to talk about the Freemasons and these guys and how they get into our life, how they all started and then also Paul John Lando Dr. Lando will be here tomorrow so we're going to have a good time have a lot to talk about and thanks for your ongoing support. Let us know if we can help with anything. Adam will be here on Wednesday and we'll talk more about the whole starch thing and he knows a lot of stuff about it as well. So we're learning more and more how we can eat what we like and still not kill ourselves. It's great. So I love you all very much. Thanks for your ongoing support. We will see you tomorrow at 10:00 Patrick Tim Pony and may the blessings be from the Hill country in Texas. This is one radio Network.com.
参与者 #1：
来自德克萨斯州的希尔国家，在全球范围内广播。这是一个电台 Network.com。好吧，对你来说，一个非常非常愉快的早上好。大约是中部时间 1130 点。Oneradonetwork.com 希望您喜欢我们今天早上与您一起进行的一次小小的访问。现在我们最喜欢的人之一可能是非常聪明和出色的人。他的名字是雷·皮特博士。他每个月的第三个星期一来。如您所知，我们的电话已经停产，但我们能够找到一种方法，如何用一个小耳机将它们插入。所以他可能听起来不同，但谁在乎呢？我们将能够听到他的声音，他也能听到我的声音。这几乎是真正重要的。如果您访问他的网站 Raypet.com，您可以在他的时事通讯上获得大量文章。他的方法，正如他在这里所写，优先考虑环境对发展、再生过程和进化观点的影响。这些年来，他在激素方面做了很多工作。俄勒冈大学生物学博士，专攻生理学，曾在不同学校任教。他开始研究黄体酮和相关激素的大量关于甲状腺的工作。他有很多甲状腺问题和荷尔蒙，所以他真的很适合交谈。还有皮特博士，谢谢你参加这个节目。早上好。早上好。你过得怎么样？你在西北做什么？你在表现自己吗？是的。因为天气不好而呆在室内？大量阅读。是的。你在读什么？我刚拿到关于假情侣的 RFK Juniors 书。这是一个非常，一本非常大的书，里面有大约几千篇参考资料以及我在过去 40 年中遇到的大部分内容。但这是对政府在公共卫生领域的立场，尤其是福西在其中的作用的非常详细的审查。我读到他确实有大量的参考资料。对。我的意思是，你真的很想用这个东西做很多工作，不是吗？是的，我认为他有大约 20 名研究人员整理参考资料。人们谴责它，因为他们不喜欢他的结论，但显然没有人在其中发现任何苍蝇。以及 400 页的政府和科学事件的详细描述。你会认为批评者会发现一些小事实说错了，但他们不知道，我不知道他是否” 在整个主流媒体上获得任何形式的曝光。你知道吗？是的，有几家美联社和所有主要出版物。我已经聘请记者银行尝试
参与者 #1：
找出问题所在。你觉得哪些想法可能最能戳中他们不喜欢的人的眼睛
参与者 #1：
政府参与所谓疫苗背后的营利动机的真实历史？大卫马丁，回顾一下疫苗专利的历史，可以看出，追溯到 15 多年前，你会发现他们在 15 多年前就计划做这种事情。这些 Fike 蛋白和响应刺突蛋白形成的抗体，15 年前这两种蛋白都被证明会破坏肺组织。所以世界上最疯狂的事情就是忽视即使是刺突蛋白的抗体也会杀死肺组织。因此，针对刺突蛋白的基于 RNA 的疫苗的整个概念，它没有任何问题，也没有任何问题，除了你可以在几周内制造出所谓的疫苗。我们在生物学上很普通，所以你' 有免疫反应。制造疫苗平均需要几年时间，大约十年。它有效，至少可以抵抗您开始使用的病毒。但是这个从未被证明可以对抗任何病毒。没有病毒。
参与者 #1：
他能证明这只是为了做一些对身体有益的事情吗？是的。如果您查看 2005 年左右的实际研究，您会发现他们已经解释了为什么刺突蛋白是有害的，以及为什么针对它的抗体是有害的。当我们形成一种针对体外某些东西的抗体时，它会给我们一个镜像蛋白质，它就像一把锁和钥匙一样锁在安德森体内。但是在形成这些抗体后，我们的身体会识别出这种适当形成的抗体的新颖性，并形成针对该抗体的抗体。第二代抗体是在生物学上尽可能接近原始毒性的精确副本。雄激素，所以每次我们对任何有害的雄激素做出反应，接下来两步，我们就在创造有害雄激素的副本，而这些针对抗体的抗体波是昂贵的。它们占据了我们的免疫装置。如此反复接触不同的东西，即使是所谓的好疫苗。如果你在发育过程中给一个人提供 50 种不同的安德森，你就占用了他们大量的免疫系统。但你这样做只是为了抗体的表面水平。每次你专注于一种新的抗体时，你都在发挥你的潜力，但你只是在投资于你将再次面对这种特定威胁的可能性。所以无论如何你都在投资过去。这与非洲由于饮食不良、接触大量寄生虫和感染、温暖潮湿的气候、大量真菌感染而造成的老龄化造成的累积损害有关。这些东西一遍又一遍地占据着他们的免疫系统，是免疫系统的负担，解释了为什么在疾病丰富的环境中获得性免疫缺陷的发生率如此之高。所以这就是为什么整个时代的事情在 80 年代初期在非洲如此普遍，因为环境。但实际上从来没有，对吧，彼得博士？从某种意义上说，一种被隔离并展示出来的时代病毒，确实如宣传的那样存在。但在非洲。他们没有发现。因此，他们将艾滋病的存在重新定义为具有艾滋病患者的典型感染。结核病在年龄感染者中很常见。每次你发现一个新的肺结核病人，根据定义，这个病人已经成为艾滋病的受害者，你就会在非洲看到很多结核病。哇。这只是一个定义问题。所以他们实际上改变了死于艾滋病的人的定义或分类，但并不是因为他们不能
参与者 #1：
是的。彼得杜赫一直在写这件事。他是世界领先的病毒学家，但一旦他质疑这种想法，即有一种导致艾滋病的病毒，他一提出质疑，他就被科学流放，没有被邀请参加科学会议，没有得到任何资助，被毁了，只是彻底结束了他的职业生涯。哇。还有一个我以前没听过的故事，我想是在肯尼迪的书中，那位著名的医学研究人员通过电话联系了他，说他想和他在全国各地交谈，与他共进晚餐。和他分开后，它拔出
参与者 #1：
一篇据称名为 Dewsburg 的研究文章与写它无关，但他说，如果你承担责任并说这是你的工作，你就回到科学机构，只是说，我在此承认艾滋病病毒的存在，他拒绝了，就一直流放。肯尼迪会参与吗？你知道有多少人在这整个过程中死去吗？谁知道与今天的注射类似的问题，P 博士，他们给这些诊断为艾滋病的孩子服用的药物？是的先生。彼得·德斯伯格（Peter Dersberg）提出了一个很好的例子，即最初在同性恋社区中非常流行的娱乐性药物。然后在停顿后，参与了未经研究或欺诈性研究的化学物质，以治疗感染，结果证明是致命的。Bluesberg 经历了那段历史，当消遣性毒品的死亡率逐渐下降时。市场上的抗逆转录病毒药物占据了主导地位，杀死了患者。哇。所以当他们被诊断出患有这种艾滋病病毒时，他们给了所有患者的行为。对。我们知道测试是什么样的吗？是不是跟当年的这个 PCR 测试很像？我们知道诊断感染这种所谓病毒的人吗？是的。直到应该识别出 HIV 大约一年后，PCR 才开始使用。是的。但这也是发明 PCR 的 Kerry Mullis 正在研究的工作。对。我看过他说我找不到任何病毒的视频。那就对了。在PCR检测出现之前，根据政府的管理方式，病毒的存在是彻底确定的。当它确实存在时，Carrie Malice，正如我所说，没有理由声称我们正在与之交谈。Dreat.com。如果您有任何问题，请访问 Doctorpat.com。对不起。让我找对吧。有时我把它搞砸了。Raypet.com 就是这样。Raypet.com，如果您愿意加入我们。对不起，只是[email protected]. 所以在我们结束这个话题之前，总的来说，他们给孩子们提供的所有这 50 种疫苗、钱以及制药公司和政府是否存在类似的问题。从出生开始，这些是否也存在一些真正的问题？哦，它们各不相同。每一种都有自己的毒性，而且这些毒性差异很大。但是，当您将所有报告的现有疫苗死亡人数加起来时，新所谓的疫苗报告的死亡人数大约是过去十年所有现有疫苗加起来的 100 倍。有几种所谓的标准疫苗是非常有毒的，比如乳头瘤病毒，相当有毒，抗破伤风疫苗。其他几乎是无害的，但它们都是负担系统，甚至这些东西都加起来，它们的危害只有目前疫苗中的 RNA 病毒的 1% 左右，当你把这些相对无害的东西加起来时，你会看到过敏症的急剧增加，不是中年和年轻人的死亡浪潮，而是过敏症在童年。因此，过敏儿童和年轻人的数量大约是以前的 50 倍。
参与者 #1：
疫苗真的被推了。是的。我们与一位绅士 Pete 博士进行了交谈，他对这件事以及未接种疫苗的孩子的健康以及接种疫苗的孩子的健康进行了全面的研究。就像你说的，这是一项令人难以置信的研究。天哪，他们只是把他赶出了医学协会，并关闭了他的诊所。男孩，他们不想听到。他们什么都不想听到。惊人。乙型肝炎疫苗在动物研究中被证明会造成挥之不去的脑损伤，他们把它给小孩子，就好像每个人都会接触到性传播的肝炎或受污染的静脉注射药物一样。不。理论上无害的麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹，他们只是给孩子科恩和其他人争辩说他们确实搞砸了先天免疫系统。而你所说的是' s 被证明，然后孩子将得到任何耳朵传染和各种各样的东西。是的。例如，有证据表明，患有正常麻疹的孩子在以后的生活中对患癌症具有相对抵抗力。继续去麻疹吧。是的。之后他们的癌症就少了。哇。我的天啊。什么东西。无论如何，我们如何进入整个疫苗范例？当我还是个孩子的时候，60 年前或 70 年前会说他们没有给我们全部负担，是吗？我不记得打过一堆疫苗。不。什么东西。无论如何，我们如何进入整个疫苗范例？当我还是个孩子的时候，60 年前或 70 年前会说他们没有给我们全部负担，是吗？我不记得打过一堆疫苗。不。什么东西。无论如何，我们如何进入整个疫苗范例？当我还是个孩子的时候，60 年前或 70 年前会说他们没有给我们全部负担，是吗？我不记得打过一堆疫苗。不。
参与者 #1：
我的父母只是从报纸、广播和杂志等那里得到他们的信息。仍然有足够的证据表明，疫苗作为预防措施或无害措施是非常值得怀疑的。从 20 世纪初开始，有证据表明肌肉内注射任何刺激性的东西，尤其是易感儿童，会导致接受注射的区域瘫痪。因此，如果它进入右臀部，那条腿更有可能发生小儿麻痹症或左肩，那条左臂更有可能瘫痪。现在已经报道了100多年。我的天啊。1950 年的一些广为人知的研究让所有了解疫苗的人都受益匪浅。今天在非洲仍然可以看到受脊髓灰质炎影响的地区的这种影响。身体特定部位麻痹的频率与接种部位密切相关。他们今天仍然接种脊髓灰质炎疫苗吗？是的，目前，我认为其中大部分被称为疫苗衍生的脊髓灰质炎麻痹，与疫苗中给予的病毒非常特别相关。是的先生。好的，我们要在这里休息一下。皮特博士，待在那儿。谢谢他戴着耳机。如您所知，我们的手机已经坏了，我们在周末进行了这项工作。谢谢你这样做，先生。这是 Patrick Timpone，oneradionetwork.com 很多人都说过，我们同意我们应该做的第一大投资是我们的健康。最后一个来电的是乔治·怀斯曼。对不起，我不记得他的名字说投资。这确实是您需要做的投资类型的事情。不是我的机器。我认为我销售的是世界上最好的机器，我尽我所能维护它并支持客户和一切。但不管你从谁那里得到它，你真的应该投资于你的健康。你会享受生活的。如果你没有健康，你将如何完成这份遗愿清单？因此，遗愿清单上的第一名应该是您的健康，然后您可以获得额外的年限。我说这件事不仅可以延长您的寿命，因为科学显示可以延长 30 年的寿命。所以我期待着去 120 50 岁，从现在到那时帮助很多人。但它也为你的岁月增添了生命。如果您在医院病床上，与机器相连，那么在您生命的最后十年中生活是没有意义的。你知道我的意思？扔飞盘，玩得开心。太真实了，不是吗？男孩，我们感觉不好，有精力去做我们需要做的事情。重点是什么？这是一项终身保修和一年无条件退款保证的投资。如果您不想要它，请查看这台 Aquacure 机器。冒泡氢气，喝它，繁殖它。这是真正的尖端技术。看看这个。在我们的商店中，使用促销代码 one radio 可享受 aquacur brownsgasmachine oneradonetwork.com 的 10% 折扣。我早上做的第一件事就是坐在我的冥想椅上。那是我从生存、白桦茸和灵芝中提取双重提取蘑菇的时候。这两种蘑菇都是免疫调节剂。如果你的免疫系统太强，比如自身免疫，它将有助于下调和镇静免疫系统。如果您的免疫系统太弱，例如免疫缺陷，它们有助于上调或增强您的免疫系统。因此，无论您正在处理什么，它们都有助于使您的免疫系统达到平衡。除了作为免疫调节剂和适应原之外，Chaga 可能以其极高的 ORAC 值或抗氧化剂含量而闻名。它清除体内的自由基。灵芝在与冥想结合使用并达到更高的意识状态方面有着悠久的历史。这就是为什么我喜欢在冥想之前服用这些。市场上有很多药用蘑菇补充剂可供选择，但大多数都是用廉价生产的蘑菇制成的，这些蘑菇生长在谷物上，要么磨碎放入胶囊中，要么用无机酒精提取。生存的方式不同。我们使用野生收获的白桦茸和有机认证的木材种植的灵芝子实体，而不是菌丝体提取物。然后我们使用有机酒精和热水提取方法，然后重新组合。因此，您可以从这些极优质的蘑菇中获得全部好处。这是一家很棒的公司，我们喜欢 Daniel 和他的工作。多年来与他合作并销售他的产品真是一种荣幸。我们的宠儿之一，这里的松花粉，它会让你的睾丸激素水平上升，就像你看到的我的测试一样 然后我们使用有机酒精和热水提取方法，然后重新组合。因此，您可以从这些极优质的蘑菇中获得全部好处。这是一家很棒的公司，我们喜欢 Daniel 和他的工作。多年来与他合作并销售他的产品真是一种荣幸。我们的宠儿之一，这里的松花粉，它会让你的睾丸激素水平上升，就像你看到的我的测试一样 然后我们使用有机酒精和热水提取方法，然后重新组合。因此，您可以从这些极优质的蘑菇中获得全部好处。这是一家很棒的公司，我们喜欢 Daniel 和他的工作。多年来与他合作并销售他的产品真是一种荣幸。我们的宠儿之一，这里的松花粉，它会让你的睾丸激素水平上升，就像你看到的我的测试一样和他的工作。多年来与他合作并销售他的产品真是一种荣幸。我们的宠儿之一，这里的松花粉，它会让你的睾丸激素水平上升，就像你看到的我的测试一样和他的工作。多年来与他合作并销售他的产品真是一种荣幸。我们的宠儿之一，这里的松花粉，它会让你的睾丸激素水平上升，就像你看到的我的测试一样和他的工作。多年来与他合作并销售他的产品真是一种荣幸。我们的宠儿之一，这里的松花粉，它会让你的睾丸激素水平上升，就像你看到的我的测试一样 然后我们使用有机酒精和热水提取方法，然后重新组合。因此，您可以从这些极优质的蘑菇中获得全部好处。这是一家很棒的公司，我们喜欢 Daniel 和他的工作。多年来与他合作并销售他的产品真是一种荣幸。我们的宠儿之一，这里的松花粉，它会让你的睾丸激素水平上升，就像你看到的我的测试一样和他的工作。多年来与他合作并销售他的产品真是一种荣幸。我们的宠儿之一，这里的松花粉，它会让你的睾丸激素水平上升，就像你看到的我的测试一样 然后我们使用有机酒精和热水提取方法，然后重新组合。因此，您可以从这些极优质的蘑菇中获得全部好处。这是一家很棒的公司，我们喜欢 Daniel 和他的工作。多年来与他合作并销售他的产品真是一种荣幸。我们的宠儿之一，这里的松花粉，它会让你的睾丸激素水平上升，就像你看到的我的测试一样
参与者 #1：
证实。然后，哦，这是一个很好的。这里。我们从 Danube Italus 那里得到了一些 CBD 油，我还能在这里得到什么？好吧，就在我面前。哦，消化苦味是消化消化性苦味的好东西。把那只小狗喷在那儿。所以这是一家不错的公司。初乳，伟大的公司。让我们知道我们是否可以为您提供任何信息。而且我认为您会非常喜欢姐妹 Thrival 产品。尝试集群。我把它放在我的冰沙里，我想你会有足够的经验。我只是想提一下我是否可以回到大约 60 秒，谈谈乔治·怀斯曼和氢气机。两年半后，我的氢气机刚刚停止。而这些事情就会发生。他们是机器。这真是太棒了。我刚刚给乔治发了电子邮件。他说，别担心。他说，我会给你发一台新机器，你所要做的就是拿走我发给你的机器，把你的旧机器放回去，然后付钱。你可以打电话让他们拿起它或把它带给他们，你就完成了。这就是他的工作方式。因此，氢机器有终身保修和一年无条件退款保证。我不认识任何人。乔治在做他同意做这些保证的所有事情时都非常小心。而且他是个好人。所以我错过了，伙计。让我告诉你。所以检查一下。这是 oneradionetwork.com 上的 Hydromachine 你可以打电话让他们拿起它或把它带给他们，你就完成了。这就是他的工作方式。因此，氢机器有终身保修和一年无条件退款保证。我不认识任何人。乔治在做他同意做这些保证的所有事情时都非常小心。而且他是个好人。所以我错过了，伙计。让我告诉你。所以检查一下。这是 oneradionetwork.com 上的 Hydromachine 你可以打电话让他们拿起它或把它带给他们，你就完成了。这就是他的工作方式。因此，氢机器有终身保修和一年无条件退款保证。我不认识任何人。乔治在做他同意做这些保证的所有事情时都非常小心。而且他是个好人。所以我错过了，伙计。让我告诉你。所以检查一下。这是 oneradionetwork.com 上的 Hydromachine
参与者 #1：
从德克萨斯州美丽的希尔国家广播。这是 oneradionetwork.com
参与者 #1：
如果我能做到的话。好的。好吧，皮特博士，我想问你这个问题。我们的节目中有一位绅士，医生，医学博士，写了大约十本书，他谈到他如何相信研究表明，如果你看看人类学家等，谷物真的对我们不利。他有点提出这样的论点，即谷物和糖确实是心脏病等背后的问题。所以让我问你这个问题。谷物好吗，在您看来，您说的是绿色还是谷物？谷物。谷物。对不起。我知道你很难使用这个新系统。谷物？是的，就像谷物一样。喜欢一切。谷物。谷物。如果他们准备得当，他们就没事。几千年前，我猜，人们围着明火做饭，发现如果他们得到灰烬，木灰放入他们烹饪的小麦或玉米或任何他们的谷物中，味道更好，对他们的健康更好，更容易消化，更有营养。它现在被称为一般它被称为混合物molization。是的先生。你告诉我们这件事就在墨西哥玉米消融的时候。我们能做到吗？是的，它的味道很好，而且很容易消化，而且营养丰富。谷物的毒素大多被碱去除或破坏。同时，色氨酸本身会促进血清素和炎症。色氨酸是一种潜在的毒素，会转化为烟酸。酰胺，这是吃未经加工的玉米的迹象之一，是烟酸缺乏症。使用下一个 stomalized 玉米的人不会 不会患上这种缺乏症，因为它为您提供了非常丰富的肌球蛋白酰胺来源。去除多不饱和脂肪是其中的一部分。它们亚类化。它们中的很大一部分变成了肥皂，就像在氢氧化钙石灰存在下一样。在皂化形式中，它们被洗掉并被扔掉或添加到鸡肉食品或其他任何东西中以获得额外的卡路里。但它只是简单地减少谷物含量的证明是一件非常重要的事情。因此在南美洲和墨西哥，玉米的减量法在传统上已经使用了很长时间。人们只是有点知道。他们想通了，代代相传。在亚洲，包括小麦在内的其他谷物也以同样的方式加工。人们已经进行了实验，尝试了十几种不同类型的谷物，说它们都通过这个过程改善了味道和可恶性。那么这个医生能准确吗？如果你只是从货架上拿来白米饭、小麦、面包或其他东西，那么这些东西对你不利。是的。储存蛋白，更不用说证明了，皂化证明是蛋白质消化的抑制剂。因此，普通谷物中的任何蛋白质都很难消化，因为证据是植物保护性毒素之一，可以阻止食用种子。因为小麦和它们真的是种子，不是吗？它们真的是草的种子，对吧？是的。例如，当一个人讨厌储存蛋白面筋时，面筋比其他储存蛋白差一些。但是储存它的氮的感觉，它是以浓缩的形式储存的。如果你发芽谷物，让它变成一点蔬菜而不是淀粉谷物，将潜在有毒的富含氮的化合物转化为具有营养价值的实际蛋白质。因此，如果它未发芽且未经过碱处理，那么那些储存蛋白质，尤其是与多不饱和脂肪结合使用时，实际上将变得毫无用处。营养上所谓的蛋白质价值在实践中并不存在。它是分析性的。但是由于我们的动物消化被这些物质本身所阻止，它们非常差。你说的是，从某种意义上说，如果你要做米饭，我不知道，燕麦或一些或任何钢切，好吧，你不能发芽燕麦，我猜，但你能像发芽一样只是白色有机大米？然后这将把它变成一种可用的，无害的食物。如果已经处理，
参与者 #1：
如果没有加热，就会发芽。但是您必须检查谷物是否至关重要，因为它们经常经过化学消毒或加热，这会阻止酶激活，从而使它们更安全。所以总的来说，我们必须真正有创造力。否则，我们食用的大多数谷物要么毫无价值，要么可能导致肠道和其他东西发炎。是的。大约 50 年前，有一些比较大米中蛋白质的很好的研究。仅从分析来看，它似乎是一个公平的来源。但是，当您将其与煮熟的绿色蔬菜、菠菜或羽衣甘蓝的蛋白质质量进行比较时，叶子中的蛋白质质量要高得多，类似于牛奶蛋白质而不是谷物，因此可能有 6% 或 7%在其中一些喂养实验中进行化学分析，几乎不超过零蛋白质。当您将其与质量与牛奶或肉类相似的叶蛋白进行比较时。如果您想像使用真正古老的小麦一样使用鹿角玉米，这应该是很好的东西，您是否必须在制作面包之前将其发芽以使其有价值？是的，浸泡后会好得多，做酸面团，甚至开始发芽过程。但是古代的谷物一般看起来有点微薄，没有淀粉。这意味着蛋白质和矿物质的价值要高得多，这很好。我知道了。所以我听到你说的更多。更现代的谷物，经过杂交或其他原因，出现了很多面筋问题，而不是古代的？古代谷物？是的，它们更大，有更多的鲨鱼和麸质，但总的来说这些都没有好处。
参与者 #1：
有一系列可以追溯到大约 100 年的研究表明，如果你加入，尤其是生淀粉，你可以净化淀粉。玉米淀粉、马铃薯淀粉。每个都有一个特征性的颗粒大小，直径从 5 个 Mitron 到 100 个 Mitron。如果你给了一个很好的喂养，也许一个胃管可以一次把大量的淀粉放进去，然后对动物的血液进行取样。是肝液。它是脑脊液，尿液，所有的体液。每 15 分钟，你会发现它首先进入血液，然后从那里进入大脑，然后从血液进入尿液。最后，即使它们是接近甚至比红细胞大得多的大颗粒，这些颗粒在所见的范围内没有变化，会从肠道直接进入循环体液。然后' 不好。当它们到达毛细血管或小动脉时，它们太大而无法前进。因此，当他们切片时，例如，在他们以这种方式喂食后，他们发现他们的身体和大脑充满了死组织的小区域。每一个地方都有一个谷物颗粒堵塞了周围组织因缺乏氧气和营养而死亡的动脉。
参与者 #1：
同样的程序已经在医学生中进行了测试。他们给了他们一杯，玉米淀粉或马铃薯淀粉浆。然后每隔 15 分钟，他们会抽血或检查尿液，您可以将血液或尿液离心，并找出它们所喂食的淀粉颗粒的特征大小和形状。
参与者 #1：
如果您以煮熟的形式摄取脂肪并用黄油或奶油来减缓吸收，您可以降低效果。而且，如果您的 parastolsis 非常活跃，例如，如果您将它与咖啡一起服用，那么更多的它们会进入您的血液。所以在某种程度上总是在发生一些事情。但淀粉越是煮熟，吃得越均衡，包括牛奶、牛奶、黄油。就是这样。那你为什么说煮熟的黄油土豆很好吃呢？比没关系好。是的。真的很好煮，对吧？是的。这意味着他们开始了，大约达到华氏 211 度，度
参与者 #1：
完全地。它煮熟了。烤一个土豆大约需要一个小时。是的。于是，这把淀粉变成了别的东西，变成了一种化学软化的搜索。这更容易测试。因此，如果我们只是出去买有机大米，无论是来自加利福尼亚的 Bosma 还是有机糙米，却什么都不做，这是否会导致淀粉和大米中的这些颗粒对心脏不好？ . 对。以及未加工大米中大米中的多不饱和脂肪。中国人开发抛光工艺来制作白米的原因是麸皮中的大部分油脂和细菌都被去除了，消失了。没有什么可租的了。所以精白米的致敏性和累积毒性较小。所以这就是为什么他们能够看到为什么大米在中国这么久了，因为他们摆脱了便便和其他可能被氧化的东西。是的。这更像是吃糖。
参与者 #1：
你真的可以吃一些这种白米饭吗？比如说，在中国很常见，然后在这里得到它？就这样，一切都被拿走了。皮特博士，如果你把它放在那里，它会发芽吗？你能在一夜之间发芽吗？它会做任何事吗
参与者 #1：
如果没有加热？仍然会有一些重要的酶可以分解淀粉和蛋白质。这就是发芽的过程吗？你正在分解这种淀粉和蛋白质，为什么人们会发芽不同的东西。这就是正在发生的事情。是的。它有助于消除证明。证明。因为这些谷物中有证据。对。这就是在整个排水沟中如此迅速地被淘汰的原因。哇。
参与者 #1：
使用全谷物而不是白面粉，它们确实含有更多的矿物质价值，但仍然存在腐臭脂肪的风险。对于腐臭的脂肪，因为它们没有被磨掉，所以它们被放在那里。正确的。对。哇。这位客人建议人们可以做一个测试。我想问你关于这个 NMR 脂蛋白面板的问题。你熟悉这个吗？嗯，是的，先生。核磁共振。我不知道具体的验血。它应该显示不同胆固醇的不同大小的颗粒和类似的东西。但是你没有听说过这个。先生。哦，它实际上测量了小 LDL 颗粒的数量。
参与者 #1：
是的。较小的颗粒会更快地腐烂，因为它们的表面相对于颗粒更大。哇。所以我们不想要小的低密度脂蛋白颗粒。我们想要大的，大的，蓬松的。是的。心脏健康和吃鸡蛋有助于保持颗粒大之间存在密切联系。因此，鸡蛋在减少超小脂肪颗粒的数量方面具有保护心脏的作用。有趣的。所以一般来说，如果颗粒很大，它们可能会堵塞东西，但由于酸败因素，情况正好相反。是的。较大的颗粒暴露在氧气中的几率要小得多。哇。这很酷。因此，在心脏病和较小的淀粉样物质中，它们会进入动脉，然后就会导致问题。这也是导致我心肌梗塞的原因。
参与者 #1：
这还没有直接和清楚地显示出来。但是淀粉
参与者 #1：
造成血管损伤。是的。这会引发免疫学变化。是的。损害使您对来自的淀粉或谷物产生一般的全身性过敏反应。这会导致你的心脏和心脏受损。然后这也可能会引起胆固醇。还有胆固醇之后的东西，这是另一种试图使事情顺利进行的物质。由于感染，这可能会导致这些东西在动脉中堆积。是的。胆固醇涉及对多不饱和脂肪酸进行解毒，这些脂肪酸会对动脉内壁造成氧化损伤。胆固醇会暂时减轻炎症，随着时间的推移，应该会逐渐减少损伤。但是如果你继续吃东西，你就会不断地损害动脉。证明结合
参与者 #1：
并在组织中超载。所以你得到一块真正的半证明半胆固醇的斑块。哇。然后这就是钙可能进来的地方，试图修补问题。一旦组织受损，钙往往会使它失去作用。所以这就是为什么你一直提倡从你的生活中获得证据的原因之一。对。对。其中很大一部分和信息可以追溯到近 100 年前
参与者 #1：
是他们真正开始思考老年治疗发生了什么的时候。在 1940 年代，人们清楚地确定，proofa 增加、加速 H、色素形成和所有退化过程。事实证明，维生素 E 减缓了这一过程。这不仅涉及销售维生素 E 作为保护性抗氧化剂，这并不是其独有的功能。它起到抗炎剂和抗雌激素的作用。但是一旦他们可以证明有一种抗氧化剂接管了，他们就不再谈论抗炎抗雌激素的作用，因为雌激素被作为一种保护性的东西出售，而不是促进年龄适应和组织损伤。对于我们大多数人或我们中的一些人或我们所有人来说，这是否会成为一个论点，为了对您有好处而定期服用一些维生素 E。合理的？我认同。这些年来这些研究得到了不同的结果，但这是因为所谓的维生素E已经被重新定义了一段时间。它被定义为通过对抗雌激素来增加生育能力的物质。那变成了简单的抗氧化剂。然后制造商的抗升级脂肪含量变得非常低，并且往往含有更多的脂肪酸、多不饱和脂肪。对。在维生素E产品中。在那些年里，维生素 E 补充剂往往会增加死亡率，因为他们实际上是在销售与维生素 E 混合的抗维生素 E。但是当你看到你所谈论的物质的性质时，是的，维生素 E 具有很强的保护作用. 接着。前进。前进。每天可能只需要大约 30 到 50 毫克即可为您提供全面保护。我们应该寻找什么？如果我们的听众想要找到每天服用的维生素 E，那么产品中会包含什么？你会寻找什么？适量的粘度和深色以及最小体积中的高效力。你不想要一个大的透明胶囊，比如一个巨大的。稀。是的。为了获得最大的收益，我使用了较小的胶囊。对。所以你得到的证据更少。你得到的证据更少。但是你会混合他们所谓的生育酚吗？混一。是的。这些是抗炎成分。这些东西是由什么制成的？这些维生素。他们来自哪里？植物将它们作为调节信号材料。很有意思。哇。嗯，这是很好的信息。所以再一次，在土豆上，它们没问题。你只需要经常煮它们。真的把它们煮得很好。并在上面涂上黄油。对。对。黄油。好的。奶油没问题。然后是谷物。现在有一家公司有一家公司可以得到 Nixtimalized 玉米。所以我有一些。这是非常好的。你可以在网上找到它。只需谷歌它。但是还有别的吗？如果你要做小麦，即使是古老的小麦，你可能想先尝试发芽。也许如果可以的话。是的。混合它们并不难。可能需要多花一个小时。真的。所以你用的是石灰。是的。氢氧化钙。氢氧化钙。据我所知，你几乎可以最大化任何东西。人们告诉我，他们使用了 parley 和一些古老的化石谷物。有趣的。你这样做吗，如果你不介意我要你自己的谷物，如果你要吃的话，你可以使用氢氧化钙。第一个问题是什么？如果你要吃某种谷物，你会为自己做这件事吗？我已经这样做了，但我通常只是买准备好的玛莎。是的。Niximalized。是的。很酷。很有意思。有趣的。让我们在这里接收几封电子邮件。早上好。我对皮特博士的问题是，如果这个疯狂的世界发生最坏的情况，如果没有甲状腺，你会怎么做才能生存？哦，他们没有甲状腺。没有被辐射。有没有办法生存或只是缓慢而快乐地死去？谢谢你。他们没有甲状腺就不必死，是吗？皮特医生，理论上你至少可以自己做，例如，如果你用牡蛎或海藻煮牛奶，这是碘和微量矿物质的来源。长时间沸腾会产生碘，实际上，碘的作用类似于甲状腺激素。你可以在你的厨房里做。如果碰巧您无法以药理学形式购买 Cyrus。嗯，这很迷人。所以你实际上是在煮牡蛎，牛奶就是你所说的。牡蛎和牛奶。是的。矿物质酪蛋白之间的反应。碘会产生一种活跃的甲状腺样物质。迷人。现在，如果我也理解的话，你不喜欢只吃任何种类的碘，对吧？不，过量服用很容易，而且很多人对添加碘或碘有一种奇怪的过敏反应。没有人真正了解发生了什么。这是一些特殊的免疫系统，但它相当普遍。如果碘摄入过多，这些反应会如何？只是病得很重。头痛、便秘或腹泻、关节炎、疼痛。我看过大约 70 项关于在盐中添加碘化物的不同研究。如果您通过碘盐摄入的碘量是每日碘需求量的三到四倍。多年来，甲状腺功能减退和甲状腺癌的风险大大增加。所以在人口基础上，Theody salt 一直较高。我对公共卫生充满信心。哇。这几乎就是每个人都吃的东西，对吧？我从蓝色容器中染盐。是的。我认为商店里的大部分盐都是加碘的。如果你在缺碘地区。安第斯山脉和墨西哥以及五大湖周围的某些地区传统上缺乏碘，因此在这些地区还可以。但一些研究发现，当碘化物被用作面团调理剂时，如果美国人吃面包，他们的平均碘摄入量是理想的十倍。我知道了。有一位先生早些时候通过电子邮件发送了他的跟腱问题，他们必须进行手术，并且给他装上了抗生素。他做到了，让我们看三周的 Ancef IV。他想让我问你他如何才能重新填充那里的所有东西，重新填充他的微生物组。有时酸奶中的细菌不会造成伤害。例如，希腊酸奶降低了乳酸含量，但仍然富含抗炎细菌。它可能是饮食的安全补充。那是一种真正浓稠的希腊酸奶。是的。艾琳写道，我认为喝橙汁会导致胰岛素飙升，而我的理解是胰岛素飙升是一件坏事。什么尖峰？胰岛素飙升。胰岛素。
参与者 #1：
是的。例如，如果您不与其他食物一起服用，而只是用牛奶减缓吸收，则会缓和胰岛素峰值。如果将其与大米进行比较，橙汁中的蔗糖含有一种胰岛素调节成分，与大米或玉米淀粉相比，果糖会轻微抑制胰岛素的释放，后者会分解成纯葡萄糖，缺乏果糖的调节作用。因此，当您查看血糖生成指数时，淀粉排在首位，而蔗糖则排在首位，因为果糖具有调节作用。例如，高钾含量也具有调节作用。但是你提到了。你想总是和别的东西一起喝，还是单独喝？如果慢慢喝。好的。不要一次降低 8 盎司。但
参与者 #1：
如果一杯果汁里有四个橙子，那么随着时间的推移把它分开，就好像你在吃整个橙子一样。我知道了。这说得通。Ray Pete 博士与我们同在。帕特里克·蒂姆，小马 7 月 1 月 17 日 对不起，玛丽说皮特博士，我的甲状腺功能低下。我怎样才能从墨西哥的药房获得装甲甲状腺？或者有什么比护甲甲状腺更好的东西吗？我猜她在墨西哥。在墨西哥很难买到，而且价格昂贵。但墨西哥几乎所有的药店都会有两家。包括 T 三和 T 4 的化合物的福布斯。C 二加含有甲甲甲状腺的比例。事实上，他们将产品设计为相当于 T 4 比 T 3 的四比一比率。然后另一个产品叫无照片，五比一的比例。它非常好。因此，如果您只是出去从药房购买盔甲或自然胸甲或其他任何东西，那大约是四比一。T 四到 T 三一般。是的。自然计划实际上从三比一到四比一不等。好的，很接近。因此，您可以在墨西哥药房买到的 Cino plus 是四比一。所以这将是一个合理的替代，对吧？是的，它的工作原理几乎相同。好的，
参与者 #1：
这是一封有趣的电子邮件。在科学新闻中。2003 年，用作疫苗载体的外泌体已被证明会大量脱落，以至于它们被称为一种生物联邦快递。这是为什么接种疫苗的人比未接种疫苗的人造成更多的死亡吗？是的，通过我们的呼吸，汗水，尿液，唾液脱落的现象。它一直在进行。辉瑞公司完全意识到这一点，并警告他们的疫苗接种团队不要让孕妇或哺乳期妇女接触到接种过疫苗的人。因此，至少可以追溯到 10 年或 15 年前，辉瑞公司完全了解这些知识，他们在测试疫苗的一开始就将其放在他们的说明中。所以那些正在接受这种所谓的觊觎注射的人，他们在汗水中流了什么，在他们的呼吸中？他们在脱落什么？就像每个人都在抛弃一切一样。天然蛋白质、RNA、DNA、脂质，还有一点点所有的化学物质。我们一直在摆脱这个。对。只是通过呼吸。是的。你把一块冰冷的金属放在鼻子下面，液体就会凝结在上面。然后你分析它，你会发现非常大的东西，外泌体自由片段，RNA自由片段，DNA片段，非常复杂。那么你认为这是关于什么的？精神上、哲学上还是进化上？为什么我们一直在释放这些外泌体？我认为这是一种生物合作的形式，就像细菌一样，甚至是不同类别的细菌。如果一组人接触过抗生素并存活下来，他们会开发出一些 DNA 来指定如何为抗生素制造解毒剂，然后他们会与其他细菌结合，即使是不同的物种，也可以通过一个小管子传递它们的 DNA 指令，这样新物种就可以弄清楚它们的知识。因此，如果细菌学会了以某种方式相互合作并提高它们的生存能力，我认为所有更高水平的人都在不断地这样做，我们正在对这种遗传成分的环境进行采样，而我们的有机体可能大部分时间都在检查它看看有没有什么用处。偶尔会出现一些有害物质。因此，如果我们从商店中的其他人那里获得一些无用的外泌体，通常对我们没有害处。是的。在德国有很多在我们的血液和组织中发现了我们所有的食物物质，DNA，其中一些实际上被整合到我们自己的基因组中。我不太明白。那么这家公司在德国用这些食物做什么呢？如果你吃牛肉，你会发现一些牛肉遗传物质在你的血液中循环。是的。然后如果你培养一些动物组织，偶尔你会发现一些 DNA 已经进入细胞核并成为我们的一部分。有证据
参与者 #1：
有毒藻类可以将其有毒 DNA 输送到我们的系统并被整合。有一些迹象表明某些生物体会产生毒性作用，但也有可能我们可以建设性地使用这种材料。因此，从某种意义上说，如果我们在周围注射了这些我们认为是非常危险的东西的人，我们是否有可能从中学习或处理它，或者不这么多。我想如果你看看不同国家的死亡率与他们持续的疫苗接种过程有关，我认为正在发生的事情是我们回顾了脱落现象和毒素的疫苗接种传递。我们称之为流行病。我觉得疫情真的好久不见了。我们所拥有的是对脱落效应和新的疫苗接种破坏或抵抗力的呼应。并且不知道他们正在使用的任何测试正在接受。对。只是没有告诉，是吗？是的。他们未能证明所给出的测试的意义。是的先生。所以我们在新闻中看到的所有这些新病例，都是不相关的，是吗，皮特医生？相关至于传播某种神秘的东西，携带梅利斯的观察，我认为还是相关的。你旋转它足够多，它会拾起任何我认为是文字的东西。对。CT，循环阈值。进行梅利斯的观察，我认为仍然是相关的。你旋转它足够多，它会拾起任何我认为是文字的东西。对。CT，循环阈值。进行梅利斯的观察，我认为仍然是相关的。你旋转它足够多，它会拾起任何我认为是文字的东西。对。CT，循环阈值。
参与者 #1：
是的。你需要做的是证明你的测试和症状之间的因果关系，这还没有真正做到，不是吗？不。马里兰州写道，对于发烧、咳嗽和呕吐的孩子，你会怎么做？你认为什么是危险的高温，你会如何对待它阿司匹林和所有的抗炎药。糖作为一种消炎药真的被忽视了。它可以减轻压力，降低压力荷尔蒙，并减少炎症细胞因子。糖会造成伤害。糖，糖很棒。但在过去的 30 年里，他们并没有教给我们这些。他们告诉我们糖会杀死我们，对吧？是的。但糖与二氧化碳的产生非常吻合。如果某些压力导致我们从葡萄糖氧化转向脂肪酸氧化，这会降低二氧化碳的产生并增加乳酸的产生，从而支持所有的炎症问题。所以通过维持葡萄糖氧化来增加你的二氧化碳应该是一件基本的事情。因此，当我们销售糖时，可以是有机甜菜糖、枫糖浆、蜂蜜、橙汁或水果。蜂蜜和橙汁非常好。枫糖浆，棕色的东西，本身就是相当有炎症的物质。哦，黑暗的东西。我以为越黑越好。不。好吧，它确实对应于矿物质含量，但也有在糖存在下加热的氨基酸。你会在氨基酸和葡萄糖之间发生有毒反应，即棕色。所以食物的褐变往往会增加其致敏性。我以为他们刚从树上弄来枫糖浆，就是这样。但不，他们做饭。是的。你必须煮很长时间。蔗糖也一样。如果你只选择一根手杖，你就有了一个非常漂亮的琥珀色溶液，非常安全。但是，如果您将其煮得足够长以得到黑糖蜜，则氨基酸和糖之间的反应会引起过敏或有毒。所以如果你喜欢枫糖浆，你想尝试找一种清淡的。那是最少处理的。对。哇。我记得当我在夏威夷待过一段时间时，他们曾经有这些推车，皮特博士，在路上，他们只会有生蔗糖。对。他们会在那里榨汁，你可以喝一杯。就在路边很有趣。是的。我认为这是非常好的果汁。对你很好。哇。这很有趣。皮特博士能否讨论生淀粉和未煮熟淀粉的危险性，例如生淀粉的预吸附，一个原因引起的肌腱、痴呆和许多其他研究。哇。这个人做了一些研究。那么生淀粉是什么样的呢？未煮熟的淀粉。那会是什么？
参与者 #1：
例如，大多数人不喜欢煮米饭，直到它变软为止。他们喜欢内核的一些分离，直到它被管理。你仍然会有一些危险的粒子。哇。所以那将是一个未煮熟的只是米饭。然后当我们得到那个淀粉，那个未煮熟的淀粉，有什么危险？那里发生了什么？如果你没有脂肪，并且经常吃很多，那么我认为你有他们在实验动物中看到的过早痴呆症的风险。哇。进入大脑。这只是一些东西开始扰乱大脑。是的。被淀粉颗粒堵塞的动脉。这条动脉下游的一切都被剥夺了营养，很可能会死亡。这一般都不好。猜猜有机糙米，意大利面或意大利面可能很难吃，对吧？是的。我认为意大利面和米饭之类的东西应该至少煮40分钟。你能想象煮意大利面 40 分钟吗？只会是口香糖。不都是口香糖吗？那就对了。
参与者 #1：
但我想你可以吃一些有机的，我不知道，铁玉米，然后发芽杂草，自己做或类似的东西，我猜。对。对生育酚维生素 E 与混合生育酚在毒性中的作用有何看法？所以我们有生育酚维生素 E 与混合生育酚。我会选择生育酚压力，但在喂养实验中，如果生育三烯酚过多，则会导致肝脏肿大。这表明某种压力效应。我从中国人那里看到这是一个很好的。干维生素 E 合法吗？Dirk Pearson 和 Sandy Shaw 早在 1982 年就推荐过。我记得那本书。还记得吗？Pearson 和 Shaw 的书推动了维生素 E。有这样的事情吗？它确实有一些维生素 E 的价值，但没有干燥的维生素 E。没有这样的东西。Sucks 有时以具有特殊抗癌效应的方式出售。记得 Derrick 曾建议将 Estherton 揉进他的头皮，让他的头发长出来。是的。它奏效了吗？不，那没有用。有什么想法吗？为头发稀疏写一封电子邮件。它似乎是在我的手腕上放了一块板子和螺丝后才开始的。所以我猜这个人的手腕上放了一个小盘子。会不会影响脱发？它会影响头发稀疏吗？头发稀疏 会不会影响脱发？它会影响头发稀疏吗？头发稀疏 会不会影响脱发？它会影响头发稀疏吗？头发稀疏
参与者 #1：
可以想象。但头皮和毛囊的生物活力
参与者 #1：
对应。例如，甲状腺功能低下的人往往会脱发，而仅仅提高您的新陈代谢率就会提高您生长和保留头发的能力。因此，如果某些事情造成持续的压力，那可能会减慢你的新陈代谢并导致脱发。有趣的。这么多年过去了，你有没有看到任何关于为什么头发往往会失去灰色的质量信息？为什么？那是多年前当博伊斯曼，科罗拉多州，蒙大拿州过早的战斗速度。在那些非常寒冷的城镇里，灰发的人似乎很高。我认为皮肤的压力可能是一个因素。辐射。人不会有牙科X光片。耳鸣有时会在脸颊的圆形区域变白，一系列重叠的圆圈表明辐射正在破坏氧化色素的能力。铜既是呼吸催化剂，又是色素形成催化剂。因此，如果您缺乏铜，您的头发往往会变白，并且会出现新陈代谢较低、可能发炎的组织。您如何看待不时用纯铜容器喝水？你觉得有价值吗？
参与者 #1：
是的。与铁相比，获得足够的铜，我认为对于吃太多肉或其他丰富食物的人来说，这是一个保护因素，他们将竞争并取代能量产生和色素形成所需的铜。所以像肌肉米，肋眼和T骨这样的肉，吃起来很有趣。那有很多铁。
参与者 #1：
是的。与大多数人一样，过多的磷酸盐和过多的色氨酸和其他兴奋性氨基酸以及过多的血红素。它提供的一切都倾向于支持癌症的发展和退化过程。哇。但我认为色氨酸是一个昏昏欲睡的时间，你说？但它在肉中具有兴奋性或炎症性。
参与者 #1：
是的。有三种酸与衰老、退化和炎症以及甲状腺功能丧失相关，即archionine、胱氨酸和色氨酸。哇。那么鸡肉，牛肉，猪肉，有什么区别吗？是的，一点点。红贻贝甜菜含有更多的铁。所以鸡肉的铁含量对身体更容易一些。无论如何，对于铁含量。那么一般的鱼呢？我想我记得我一直在殴打。他说一些最好的选择是扇贝。你喜欢扇贝吗？好的选择。应该是第一吧 第一。
参与者 #1：
扇贝。螃蟹、 stalamari、 鱿鱼。
参与者 #1：
所有的甲壳类动物和软体动物都很好。虾？是的。虾。相对于铁而言，铜含量较高。我看到那种绿松石色的铜和龙虾之类的东西。这就是你得到的。那里的铜比铁多。有趣的。在任何地方都吃更多鱼的人通常比一般的重肉食者的死亡率更高吗？是的。我认为部分原因是铁含量较低。而低脂鱼，我认为是最好的低脂鱼。所以除了让我们看看，鲑鱼会是一种高脂肪的鱼，有很多三。对。你不是欧米茄三号的粉丝。正确的。是的。另一端是虾和扇贝。凉爽的。再来一个，然后我们就放你走。我一天吃太多盐了。有时第二天早上我的手关节会因疼痛或弯曲而僵硬。关于如何缓解 perd 的任何想法？一些盐。哇。为什么盐会对这个人的关节造成这种影响？皮特博士？盐。盐。盐太多。当他们吃太多盐时，他们的关节往往会吱吱作响，手会疼痛。我不知道。我想我从来没有听说过。是的，我们从来没有听说过那个。但是现在，再次，只是要知道，重复一遍，如果我理解的话，你最喜欢的是 PICC Morton 的 Picoline 和 Canning。卖。对。不含碘。对。它非常纯净。很纯的东西。好吧，我们今天早上在这里覆盖了很多领域。感谢您提供有关整个淀粉和谷物的所有信息，因为自从我们有这个家伙以来，我们收到了很多电子邮件。所以我认为他确实走在了正确的轨道上。我的意思是，他说的是一般情况下，你没有 听不到节目。大概。但只是商业谷物，对很多人来说可能是个问题。对。只是吃它们。是的。他们没有做好充分的准备。他们没有做好充分的准备。皮特博士，谢谢。你的时事通讯怎么样？我们很快就会有一个新的吗？我要写一些关于张量的东西。我大约每五年左右回到这个主题。哦，你会吗？我已经研究了 20 或 30 年的一些事情现在才开始真正成为人们感兴趣的主题。那太棒了。嗯，我们很期待，先生。您只需通过电子邮件发送时事通讯即可获得 Ray Pete 的时事通讯。让我们来看看。复数褶皱和时事通讯。对。雷·佩茨 t 准备妥当。他们没有做好充分的准备。皮特博士，谢谢。你的时事通讯怎么样？我们很快就会有一个新的吗？我要写一些关于张量的东西。我大约每五年左右回到这个主题。哦，你会吗？我已经研究了 20 或 30 年的一些事情现在才开始真正成为人们感兴趣的主题。那太棒了。嗯，我们很期待，先生。您只需通过电子邮件发送时事通讯即可获得 Ray Pete 的时事通讯。让我们来看看。复数褶皱和时事通讯。对。雷·佩茨 t 准备妥当。他们没有做好充分的准备。皮特博士，谢谢。你的时事通讯怎么样？我们很快就会有一个新的吗？我要写一些关于张量的东西。我大约每五年左右回到这个主题。哦，你会吗？我已经研究了 20 或 30 年的一些事情现在才开始真正成为人们感兴趣的主题。那太棒了。嗯，我们很期待，先生。您只需通过电子邮件发送时事通讯即可获得 Ray Pete 的时事通讯。让我们来看看。复数褶皱和时事通讯。对。雷·佩茨 已经工作了 20 或 30 年，现在才开始真正成为人们感兴趣的主题。那太棒了。嗯，我们很期待，先生。您只需通过电子邮件发送时事通讯即可获得 Ray Pete 的时事通讯。让我们来看看。复数褶皱和时事通讯。对。雷·佩茨 已经工作了 20 或 30 年，现在才开始真正成为人们感兴趣的主题。那太棒了。嗯，我们很期待，先生。您只需通过电子邮件发送时事通讯即可获得 Ray Pete 的时事通讯。让我们来看看。复数褶皱和时事通讯。对。雷·佩茨[email protected]，对吗？是的。这将是一年四次，而不是六次。每年的订阅费用约为 10 美元。我的天啊。10 美元。因为 PayPal 对 10 美元收取近 8% 的费用，所以我们将赚取 20 美元的 10 点。上帝爱你。所以你可以得到那个，伙计们。那将是一年四次。[email protected]. 皮特博士，像往常一样，能有你真是太荣幸了。我们很乐意与您交谈。你喜欢这个小耳机吗？你认为我们应该坚持下去还是下次再接电话？我几乎明白你所说的一切。嗯，你听起来很棒。我的意思是，你的声音比电话里的要近得多。如果你不介意，我们可以再试一次，只要你能听到我的声音。嗯，非常感谢，先生。照顾好你自己。我们很感激。好的。好的。谢谢你。谢谢你，先生。[email protected]太好了。是的。我们能够把这个小东西放在一起，因为我们没有电话的事情。我们就是做不到。
参与者 #1：
嗯，那太好了。是的。很高兴对整个谷物的事情有一些真正的了解，因为我一直在考虑这个
参与者 #1：
自从戴维斯博士上节目以来。
参与者 #1：
是的。人们正在给我发电子邮件。你得到 Nixtomalized 玉米的那个网站叫什么名字？我得查一下。我手头没有。但是有一个网站。我买了一大堆。和
参与者 #1：
所以如果你想要一种谷物，它已经混合和明智了，但你也可以自己做。我们得调查一下氢氧化钙。所以我们要和布里奇谈谈，看看她是否会在玉米上发芽，甚至在她做面包之前把它提升到另一个层次。但他确实说过，玉米和这些古老的小麦在整个消化过程中总体来说非常容易，这很有趣。好的，孩子们，我们明天见。我们将谈论共济会和这些人以及他们如何进入我们的生活，他们是如何开始的，然后还有保罗·约翰·兰多博士。兰多明天将在这里，所以我们将度过一段美好的时光谈论并感谢您一直以来的支持。让我们知道我们是否可以提供任何帮助。亚当将在星期三在这里，我们' 我会更多地谈论整个淀粉的事情，他也知道很多关于它的事情。因此，我们越来越多地学习如何吃我们喜欢的东西，而不是自杀。这很棒。所以我非常爱你们。感谢您一直以来的支持。我们明天晚上 10:00 见 Patrick Tim Pony，祝福来自德克萨斯州的山区。这是一个电台 Network.com。
阅读 RFK Jr. 的书 The Real Anthony Fauci。主流正试图找出它实际上有问题的地方，但他们做不到。
本书最大的震撼：政府参与疫苗生产的营利动机。多年前已知的刺突蛋白的危险。从疫苗中产生有害抗原。由于身体花费过多的能量来制造针对疫苗引入的疾病的抗体，从而加重和禁用免疫系统。疫苗如何产生艾滋病。
政府对彼得·杜斯伯格博士关于艾滋病否认主义的工作的虚假陈述。AZT 治疗的问题。
每种疫苗都有其自身的毒性。引起过敏的极大增加。但新冠病毒疫苗造成的死亡人数是所有现有疫苗死亡人数的 100 倍。
乙型肝炎疫苗在动物研究中引起了挥之不去的脑损伤。现在常规给予新生儿。
患有野生麻疹会降低患癌症的风险。
甚至在 1940 年代之前，就有证据表明，任何注射肌肉的东西都会使接受注射的孩子身体部位麻痹。例如臀部注射引起的脊髓灰质炎。
谷物和糖会导致健康问题吗？必须做好适当的准备。玉米的碱化可破坏毒素，因为色氨酸转化为烟酰胺。还通过石灰皂化去除 PUFA。
储存蛋白质（例如面筋）的发芽将富含氮的化合物转化为具有营养价值的蛋白质。
白米饭可以发芽吗？细菌可能已经被清除了。浸泡会有所帮助。未加热的燕麦会发芽，但仍需要保持活力且未经化学处理。
煮熟的蔬菜比谷物含有更高质量的蛋白质。
小麦在使用前浸泡后更有营养。古代谷物的淀粉含量低于现代小麦或玉米。淀粉颗粒的大小决定了对健康的影响。
用黄油煮熟的土豆很好。淀粉经过化学软化，更容易消化。
精白米中的油被去除，所以没有任何东西会变质。更少的过敏性和更少的毒性。
全谷物具有更高的矿物质价值，但更容易腐烂。
小 LDL 颗粒会更快地腐烂。较大的低密度脂蛋白颗粒较少接触氧气。吃鸡蛋会保持颗粒大小。
淀粉会导致小毛细血管的血管损伤。对小淀粉颗粒引起过敏反应。
胆固醇可以解毒多不饱和脂肪酸。PUFA/胆固醇形成斑块。维生素E减缓了这个过程。具有抗氧化、抗炎、抗雌激素作用。
想要颜色更深、粘度更高、胶囊更小、PUFA 含量更低的维生素 E 补充剂。
可以对未加热的谷物进行nixtamalize。
如果您没有甲状腺并且无法购买甲状腺药物怎么办？用牡蛎或海藻煮牛奶。产生碘化酪蛋白，其作用类似于甲状腺激素。
碘摄入过多会导致头痛、便秘、腹泻。多年食用碘盐会导致甲状腺癌和甲状腺功能减退的风险。大多数美国人的碘摄入量超过 10 倍。
服用抗生素后如何重新填充微生物组？希腊酸奶。
喝 OJ 会导致胰岛素飙升吗？需要与其他食物一起服用。与谷物相比，果糖略微抑制葡萄糖反应。高钾含量也会缓和反应。随着时间的推移将其传播开来。
听众想在墨西哥获得 Armor 甲状腺。非常难得到。可以获得组合T4/T3比率的产品。
什么是脱落？是为什么 vaxxed 的死亡人数比 unvaxxed 多吗？多年前，辉瑞公司警告说，孕妇或哺乳期妇女不应接触疫苗。
我们从我们吃的东西中吸收DNA。
Covid测试不相关。Kary Mullis 的观察仍然具有相关性。
孩子发烧、咳嗽、呕吐怎么办。抗炎剂。糖减少炎症细胞因子，减少乳酸，增加CO2。较深的糖更具毒性和过敏性。想要更轻的枫糖浆。
生淀粉和未煮熟的淀粉有多危险？因为小动脉被淀粉颗粒堵塞，可能会过早痴呆。将意大利面和米饭煮 40 分钟。将米饭煮至粘稠。
服用混合生育酚而不是生育三烯酚，后者在动物喂养实验中会产生脂肪肝。
Durk Pearson 的Life Extension 书中的干维生素 E 怎么样 ？
提高新陈代谢率会促进头发生长。铜缺乏会导致白发和更多发炎的组织。
用铜喝好吗？铜和铁在竞争。
色氨酸、蛋氨酸与衰老退化有关。鸡肉含铁较少。扇贝、螃蟹、鱿鱼、虾、甲壳类动物都不错。与铁相比，铜含量高。低脂鱼很好。
听众报告盐分过多导致关节疼痛。
雷皮博士，
我想问您这个问题。
我们的节目中有一位绅士，
医生，医学博士，写了大约十本书，
他谈到他如何相信研究表明，
如果看看人类学家等，
谷物真的对我们不利。
他有点提出这样的论点，
即谷物和糖确实是心脏病等背后的问题。
所以让我问您这个问题。
在您看来，谷物好吗？
如果准备得当，就没事。
几千年前，
我猜人们围着明火做饭，
发现如果得到灰烬，
木灰放入烹饪的小麦或玉米或任何谷物中，
味道更好，对健康更好，更容易消化，更有营养。
现在被称为一般它被称为碱化。
您告诉我们墨西哥玉米碱化。我们能做到吗？
是的，味道很好，而且很容易消化，而且营养丰富。
谷物的毒素大多被碱去除或破坏。
同时，色氨酸本身会促进血清素和炎症。
色氨酸是一种潜在的毒素，会转化为烟酸。
烟酸缺乏症是吃未经加工的玉米的迹象之一，
使用下碱化玉米的人不会患上这种缺乏症，
因为提供了非常丰富的烟酰胺来源。
去除普发是其中的一部分。
其中的很大一部分变成了肥皂，
就像在氢氧化钙石灰存在下一样。
在皂化形式中，
它们被洗掉并被扔掉、或添加到鸡肉食品或其他任何东西中以获得额外的热量。
但那只是普发，简单地减少谷物普发含量是一件非常重要的事情。
因此在南美洲和墨西哥，
玉米减量法在传统上已经使用了很长时间。
人们只是有点知道。
他们想通了，代代相传。
在亚洲，包括小麦在内的其他谷物也以同样的方式加工。
人们已经进行了实验，尝试了十几种不同类型的谷物，
据说都通过这个过程改善了味道和一些可恶的问题。
那么这个医生准确吗？
如果只是从货架上拿来白米饭、小麦、面包或其他东西，
那么这些东西也不好。
是的。那么有储藏蛋白，
更不用说普发了，皂化普发是蛋白质消化的抑制剂。
因此，
普通谷物中的任何蛋白质都很难消化，
因为是植物保护性毒素之一，
可以阻止食用种子。
因为小麦那些真的是种子，不是吗？
真的是草的种子，对吧？
是的。
例如，
当一个人讨厌储藏蛋白麸质时，
麸质比其他储藏蛋白差一些。
但是储存氮，是以浓缩的形式储存的。
如果发芽谷物，让它变成蔬菜而不是淀粉谷物，
将潜在有毒的富含氮的化合物转化为具有营养价值的实际蛋白质。
因此，如果它未发芽且未经过碱处理，
那么那些储藏蛋白质，尤其是与普发结合使用时，
实际上将变得毫无用处。
营养上所谓的蛋白质价值在实践中并不存在。
只是分析上有的。
但是由于我们动物消化被这些物质本身所阻止，
它们非常差。
您说的是，从某种意义上说，
如果要做米饭，燕麦或一些或任何钢切，
好吧，我猜不能发芽燕麦，
但能像发芽白色有机大米吗？
然后把它变成一种可用的，无害的食物。
如果已经处理，
如果没有加热，就会发芽。
但是必须检查谷物是否至关重要，
因为它们经常经过化学消毒或加热，
这会阻止酶激活，从而使它们更安全。
所以总的来说，我们必须真正有创造力。
否则，我们食用的大多数谷物要么毫无价值，
要么可能导致肠道和其他东西发炎。
大约 50 年前，有一些比较大米中蛋白质的很好的研究。
仅从分析来看，似乎是一个公平的来源。
但是，当将其与煮熟的绿色蔬菜，菠菜或羽衣甘蓝的蛋白质质量进行比较时，
叶子中的蛋白质质量要高得多，
类似于牛奶蛋白质，而谷物不行，
因此可能有 6% 或 7%，
在其中一些喂养实验中进行化学分析，
几乎不超过零蛋白质。
当将其与质量与牛奶或肉类相似的叶蛋白进行比较时。
如果想像使用真正古老的小麦一样使用鹿角玉米，
这应该是很好的东西，
是否必须在制作面包之前将其发芽以使其有价值？
是的，浸泡后会好得多，做酸面团，
甚至开始发芽过程。
但是古代的谷物一般看起来有点薄，
没有淀粉。这意味着蛋白质和矿物质的价值要高得多，
这很好。
我知道了。所以我听到您说过很多。
更现代的谷物，经过杂交或其他原因，
出现了很多麸质问题，而不是古代谷物？
是的，现代的更大，有更多的淀粉和麸质，
但总的来说这些都没有好处。
有一系列可以追溯到大约 100 年的研究表明，
如果深入，尤其是生淀粉，可以净化淀粉。
玉米淀粉、马铃薯淀粉。
每个都有一个特征性的颗粒大小，
直径从 5 到 100 个 微米。
如果给了一个很好的喂食，
也许一个胃管可以一次把大量的淀粉放进去，
然后每 15 分钟对动物的血液进行取样。
肝液、脑脊液，尿液，所有的体液。
会发现它首先进入血液，
然后从血液进入大脑，
然后从血液进入尿液。
最后，即使它们是接近甚至比红细胞大得多的大颗粒，
这些颗粒在所见的范围内没有变化，
会从肠道直接进入循环体液。
然后不太好。
当它们到达毛细血管或小动脉时，
它们太大而无法前进。
因此，当他们切片时，
例如，在他们以这种方式喂食后，
他们发现身体和大脑充满了死组织的小区域。
每一个地方都有一个谷物颗粒堵塞了周围组织，因缺乏氧气和营养而死亡的动脉。
同样的程序已经在医学生中进行了检测。
给了他们一杯玉米淀粉或马铃薯淀粉浆。
然后每隔 15 分钟抽血或检查尿液，
将血液或尿液离心，
找出所喂食的淀粉颗粒的特征大小和形状。
如果以煮熟的形式摄取脂肪，用黄油或奶油来减缓吸收，
可以降低这些效果。
而且，如果消化非常活跃，
例如，如果将它与咖啡一起服用，
那么更多的会进入血液。
所以在某种程度上总是会发生一些事情。
但淀粉煮的越熟，而且在均衡饮食里包括牛奶、奶油、黄油，就越好。
那您为什么说煮熟的黄油土豆很好呢？
比没有（黄油）好。
是的。真的要好好煮，对吧？
是的。这意味着大约达到摄氏100度，完全地煮熟了。
烤一个土豆大约需要一个小时。
是的。于是，这把淀粉变成了别的，
变成了一种化学上软化的淀粉。这更容易消化。
因此，如果只是出去买有机大米，
无论是来自加利福尼亚的 Bosma 还是有机糙米，
什么都不做，是否会导致淀粉和大米中的这些颗粒对心脏不好？
对。以及未加工大米中的普发。
中国人开发抛光工艺来制作白米的原因是，
麸皮中的大部分油脂和细菌都被去除了，
消失了。
没有什么留下的了。
所以精白米的致敏性和累积毒性较小。
所以这就是为什么能够看到大米在中国吃这么久了，
因为他们摆脱了垃圾和其他可能被氧化的东西。
是的。这更像是在吃糖。
真的可以吃一些这种白米饭吗？
比如说，在中国很常见的，然后在美国买到它？
就这样，一切都被拿走了。
雷皮博士，如果您把它放在那里，它会发芽吗？
能在一夜之间发芽吗？
会有作用吗，如果没有加热，
仍然会有一些重要的酶可以分解淀粉和蛋白质。
这就是发芽的过程吗？
在分解这种淀粉和蛋白质，
为什么人们会发芽不同的东西。
这就是起作用的东西。
是的。有助于消除普发。
因为这些谷物中有普发。
这就是在全谷物如此迅速地被淘汰的原因。
使用全谷物而不是白面粉，
确实含有更多的矿物质价值，
但仍然存在脂肪氧化的风险。
对于腐化的脂肪，
因为没有被磨掉，所以被放在那里。对吗？
对。
这位嘉宾建议人们可以做一个检测。
我想问您关于这个 核磁共振NMR 脂蛋白指标的问题。
您熟悉这个吗？
核磁共振。
我不知道具体的血检。
应该显示不同胆固醇的不同大小的颗粒和类似的东西。
但是您没有听说过这个。
实际上测量了小 LDL 颗粒的数量。
是的。较小的颗粒会更快地烂，
因为它们的表面相对于颗粒更大。
哇。所以我们不想要小的低密度脂蛋白颗粒。
我们想要大的，大的，蓬松的。
是的。心脏健康和吃鸡蛋有助于保持颗粒大之间存在密切联系。
因此，鸡蛋在减少超小脂肪颗粒的数量方面具有保护心脏的作用。
有趣的。
所以一般来说，如果颗粒很大，可能会堵塞东西，
但由于酸败因素，情况正好相反。
是的。较大的颗粒暴露在氧气中的几率要小得多。
哇。这很酷。
因此，在心脏病中，较小的淀粉样物质中会进入动脉，
然后就会导致问题。
这也是导致心肌梗塞的原因。
这还没有直接和清楚地显示出来。
但是淀粉造成血管损伤。
是的。会引发免疫学变化。
是的。损伤，对来自的淀粉或谷物产生一般的全身性过敏反应。
这会导致心脏受损。
然后这也可能会引起胆固醇。
还有胆固醇之后的东西，
这是另一种试图使事情顺利进行的物质。
由于感染，这可能会导致这些东西在动脉中堆积。
是的。胆固醇涉及对普发进行解毒，
这些脂肪酸会对动脉内壁造成氧化损伤。
胆固醇会暂时减轻炎症，随着时间的推移，
应该会逐渐减少损伤。
但是如果继续吃，就会不断地损害动脉。
与普发结合，并在组织中超载。
所以得到一块真正的半普发半胆固醇的斑块。
哇。然后这就是钙可能进来的地方，
试图修补问题。
一旦组织受损，钙往往会使它失去作用。
所以这就是为什么您一直提倡从生活中排除普发的原因之一。
对。
其中很大一部分和信息可以追溯到近 100 年前
是有人真正开始思考治疗衰老发生了什么的时候。
在 1940 年代，人们清楚地确定，
普发增加、加速褐色素形成和所有退化过程。
事实证明，维生素 E 减缓了这一过程。
这不仅涉及销售维生素 E 作为保护性抗氧化剂，
这并不是其独有的功能。还起到抗炎剂和抗雌激素的作用。
但是一旦他们可以证明显示有抗氧化剂接管了，
他们就不再谈论抗炎抗雌激素的作用，
因为雌激素被作为一种保护性的东西出售，
而不是促进衰老适应和组织损伤。
对于我们大多数人、或我们中的一些人、或我们所有人来说，
这是否会成为一个论点，
为了对自己有好处而定期服用一些维生素 E。合理吗？
我认同。
这些年来这些研究得到了不同的结果，
但这是因为所谓的维生素E已经被重新定义了一段时间。
它被定义为通过对抗雌激素来增加生育能力的物质。
那变成了简单的抗氧化剂。
然后制造商的抗氧化脂肪含量变得非常低，
并且往往含有更多的脂肪酸、普发。
对。在维生素E产品中。
在那些年里，维生素 E 补剂往往会增加死亡率，
因为他们实际上是在销售与维生素 E 混合的抗维生素 E。
但是当看到您所谈论的物质的性质时，
维生素 E 具有很强的保护作用.
每天可能只需要大约 30 到 50 毫克即可为您提供全面保护。
我们应该寻找什么？
如果我们的听众想要找到每天服用的维生素 E，
那么产品中会包含什么？您会寻找什么？
适度的粘度和深色的，以及最小体积中的高效力。
不要一个大的透明胶囊，
比如一个巨大的稀释的。
是的。为了获得最大的收益，
我使用了较小的胶囊。
对。所以得到的普发更少。
您得到的证普发更少。
但是您会混合所谓的生育酚吗？
混合。
是的。这些是抗炎成分。
这些东西是由什么制成的？
这些维生素。来自哪里？
植物将它们作为调节信号材料。很有意思。
哇。这是很好的信息。
所以再一次，土豆没问题。只需要经常煮。
真的煮得很好。并在上面涂上黄油。
对。黄油。
好的。奶油没问题。
然后是谷物。
现在有一家公司卖碱化玉米。
所以我有一些。这是非常好的。
可以在网上找到它。只需谷歌搜一下。
但是还有别的吗？
如果要做小麦，
即使是古老的小麦，可能想先尝试发芽。
也许如果可以的话。
是的。混合并不难。
可能需要多花一个小时。
真的。所以用的是石灰。
是的。氢氧化钙。
据我所知，氢氧化钙几乎可以碱化任何东西。
有人告诉我，他们用在 大麦 和一些古老的谷物。
有趣的。您这样做吗，
如果您不介意，我要您自己的谷物，
如果要吃的话，可以使用氢氧化钙。
第一个问题是什么？
如果您要吃某种谷物，
您会为自己这么做吗？
我已经这样做了，但我通常只是买加工好的玛莎。
碱化的。
很酷。很有意思。有趣的。
让我们收几封电子邮件。
早上好。我对雷皮博士的问题是：
如果这个疯狂的世界发生最坏的情况，
如果没有甲状腺，您会怎么做才能生存？
没有甲状腺。没有被辐射。
有没有办法生存、或只是缓慢而快乐地死去？
谢谢您。
没有甲状腺就没办法，是吗？雷皮博士，
理论上您至少可以自己做，
例如，如果用牡蛎或海藻煮牛奶，
这是碘和微量矿物质的来源。
长时间沸腾会产生碘，
实际上，碘的作用类似于甲状腺激素。
您可以在您的厨房里做。
如果无法以药的形式购买 Cyrus。
这很迷人。所以实际上是在牛奶煮牡蛎，就是您所说的。牡蛎和牛奶。
是的。矿物质酪蛋白之间的反应。
碘会产生一种活跃的甲状腺样物质。
迷人。现在，如果我理解的话，您不喜欢只吃任何种类的碘，对吧？
不，过量服用很容易，很多人对添加碘或碘本身有一种奇怪的过敏反应。
没有人真正了解发生了什么。这是一些特殊的免疫系统，
但相当普遍。
如果碘摄入过多，这些反应会如何？
只是病得很重。头痛、便秘或腹泻、关节炎、疼痛。
我看过大约 70 项关于在盐中添加碘化物的不同研究。
如果通过碘盐摄入的碘量是每日碘需求量的三到四倍。
多年来，甲减和甲状腺癌的风险大大增加。
所以在人口基础上，碘盐的碘一直较高。
我对公共卫生充满信心。
哇。这几乎就是每个人都吃的东西，对吧？我从蓝色容器中染盐。
是的。我认为商店里的大部分盐都是加碘的。
如果您在缺碘地区，安第斯山脉和墨西哥以及五大湖周围的某些地区传统上缺乏碘，
因此在这些地区还可以。
但一些研究发现，当碘化物被用作面团调理剂时，
如果美国人吃面包，他们的平均碘摄入量是理想状态的十倍。
我知道了。有一位先生早些时候通过电子邮件发送了他的跟腱问题，
他必须进行手术，并给他上了抗生素。
他做到了，让我们看三周的 Ancef IV。
他想让我问您，他如何才能重新填充那里的所有东西，
重新填充他的微生物组。
有时酸奶中的细菌不会造成伤害。
例如，希腊酸奶降低了乳酸含量，但仍然富含抗炎细菌。
可能是饮食的安全补充。
那是一种真正浓稠的希腊酸奶。
是的。
艾琳写道，
我认为喝橙汁会导致胰岛素飙升，
而我的理解是胰岛素飙升是一件坏事。
是的。例如，如果您不与其他食物一起服用，
而只是用牛奶减缓吸收，则会缓和胰岛素峰值。
如果将其与大米进行比较，
橙汁中的糖含有一种胰岛素调节成分，
果糖会轻微抑制胰岛素的释放，
大米或玉米淀粉相比，会分解成纯葡萄糖，
缺乏果糖的调节作用。
因此，当您查看血糖生成指数时，
淀粉排在首位，
蔗糖则排在首位，
因为果糖具有调节作用。
例如，高钾含量也具有调节作用。
但是您提到了。您想总是和别的东西一起喝，那单独喝呢？
如果是，那慢慢喝。
好的。不要一次喝 8 盎司。（约250毫升）
但是，如果一杯果汁里用了四个橙子，
那么随着时间的推移分开喝，
就好像在吃整个橙子一样。
我知道了。这说得通。
雷皮博士与我们同在。
玛丽说：雷皮博士，
我的甲状腺功能低下。
我怎样才能从墨西哥的药房获得Amour甲状腺？
或者有什么比Amour甲状腺更好的东西吗？
我猜她在墨西哥。在墨西哥很难买到，而且价格昂贵。
但墨西哥几乎所有的药店都会有两家。
包括 T3和 T 4 的化合物的。。。。
Cinoplus。。含有甲状腺的比例。
事实上，
他们将产品设计为相当于 T 4 比 T 3 的四比一比率。
然后另一个产品叫。。。，五比一的比例。它非常好。
因此，如果您只是出去从药房购买，
那大约是四比一。T4到 T 3的一般比率。
是的。自然计划实际上从三比一到四比一不等。
好的，很接近。
因此，您可以在墨西哥药房买到的 Cinoplus 是四比一。
所以这将是一个合理的替代，对吧？
是的，工作原理几乎相同。
好的，
#1：
这是一封有趣的电子邮件。
在科学新闻中。2003 年，用作疫苗载体的外泌体已被证明会大量脱落，
以至于被称为一种生物快递。
这是为什么接种疫苗的人比未接种疫苗的人造成更多的死亡吗？
是的，通过我们的呼吸，汗水，尿液，唾液脱落的现象。
一直在进行。
辉瑞公司完全意识到这一点，
并警告他们的疫苗接种团队不要让孕妇或哺乳期妇女接触到接种过的人。
因此，至少可以追溯到 10 年或 15 年前，
辉瑞公司完全了解这些知识，
他们在检测疫苗的一开始就将其放在他们的说明中。
所以那些正在接受这种所谓注射的人，
他们在汗水中流了什么，
在他们的呼吸中？
他们在脱落什么？
就像每个人都在抛弃一切一样。
天然蛋白质、RNA、DNA、脂质，
还有一点点所有的化学物质。
我们一直在摆脱这个。
对。只是通过呼吸。
是的。把一块冰冷的金属放在鼻子下面，
液体就会凝结在上面。
然后分析它，
会发现非常大的东西，外泌体自由片段，RNA自由片段，DNA片段，非常复杂。
那么您认为这是关于什么的？精神上、哲学上还是进化上？
为什么我们一直在释放这些外泌体？
我认为这是一种生物合作的形式，
就像细菌一样，甚至是不同类别的细菌。
如果一组人接触过抗生素并存活下来，
他们会开发出一些 DNA 来指定如何为抗生素制造解毒剂，
然后他们会与其他细菌结合，
即使是不同的物种，
也可以通过一个小管子传递它们的 DNA 指令，
这样新物种就可以弄清楚它们的知识。
因此，如果细菌学会了以某种方式相互合作并提高它们的生存能力，
我认为所有更高水平的人都在不断地这样做，
我们正在对这种遗传成分的环境进行采样，
而我们的有机体可能大部分时间都在检查它看看有没有什么用处。
偶尔会出现一些有害物质。
因此，如果我们从其他人那里获得一些无用的外泌体，通常对我们没有害处。
是的。在德国有很多在血液和组织中发现了所有的食物物质，
DNA，其中一些实际上被整合到我们自己的基因组中。
我不太明白。那么这家公司在德国用这些食物做什么呢？
如果您吃牛肉，您会发现一些牛肉遗传物质在您的血液中循环。
是的。然后如果您培养一些动物组织，
偶尔您会发现一些 DNA 已经进入细胞核并成为我们的一部分。
有证据显示有毒藻类可以将其有毒 DNA 输送到我们的系统并被整合。
有一些迹象表明某些生物体会产生毒性作用，
但也有可能我们可以建设性地使用这种材料。
因此，从某种意义上说，
如果我们周围是注射了这些我们认为是非常危险的东西的人，
我们是否有可能从中学习或处理它，或者没这么多。
我想如果您看看不同国家的死亡率与他们持续的疫苗接种过程有关，
我认为正在发生的事情是，我们回顾了脱落现象和毒素的疫苗接种传递。
我们称之为流行病。我觉得疫情真的好久不见了。
我们所拥有的是对脱落效应和新的疫苗接种破坏或抵抗力的呼应。
并且不知道他们正在使用正在接受的任何检测。
对。
只是没有告知，是吗？
是的。他们未能证明所给出的检测的意义。
所以我们在新闻中看到的所有这些新病例，都是不相关的，是吗，雷皮博士？
相关，至于传播某种神秘的东西，梅利斯的观察，
我认为还是相关的。
旋转足够多，
会拾起任何我认为是文字的东西。
对。
CT，循环阈值，进行梅利斯的观察，我认为仍然是相关的。
您需要做的是证明您的检测和症状之间的因果关系，
这还没有真正做到，
不是吗？
不。马里兰州写道，对于发烧、咳嗽和呕吐的孩子，
您会怎么做？您认为什么是危险的高温，
您会如何看待阿司匹林和所有的抗炎药。
糖作为一种消炎药真的被忽视了。
可以减轻压力，降低压力激素，
并减少炎症细胞因子。
糖不会造成伤害。
糖，糖很棒。
但在过去的 30 年里，他们并没有教给我们这些。
他们告诉我们糖会杀死我们，对吧？
是的。但糖与二氧化碳的产生非常吻合。
如果某些压力导致从葡萄糖氧化转向脂肪酸氧化，
这会降低二氧化碳的产生并增加乳酸的产生，
从而支持所有的炎症问题。
所以通过维持葡萄糖氧化来增加二氧化碳，应该是一件基本的事情。
因此，当我们消费糖时，
可以是有机甜菜糖、枫糖浆、蜂蜜、橙汁或水果。
蜂蜜和橙汁非常好。
枫糖浆，棕色的，本身就是相当有炎症的物质。
黑的。我以为越黑越好。
不。好吧，确实对应于矿物质含量，
但也有在糖存在下加热的氨基酸。
会在氨基酸和葡萄糖之间发生有毒反应，
即是棕色的。所以食物的褐变往往会增加其致敏性。
我以为刚从树上弄来枫糖浆，就是这样。
不，加工了。
必须煮很长时间。蔗糖也一样。
如果只选择一根，就有了一个非常漂亮的琥珀色溶液，非常安全。
但是，如果将其煮得足够长以得到黑糖蜜，
则氨基酸和糖之间的反应会引起过敏或有毒。
所以如果喜欢枫糖浆，尝试找一种清淡的。那是最少处理的。
对。
哇。我记得当我在夏威夷待过一段时间时，曾经有这些推车，
雷皮博士，在路上，只有生蔗糖。
对。他们会在那里榨汁，
您可以喝一杯。就在路边很有趣。
是的。我认为这是非常好的果汁。对您很好。
哇。这很有趣。
雷皮博士能否讨论生淀粉和未煮熟淀粉的危险性，
例如生淀粉的预吸附，
一个原因引起的肌腱、痴呆和许多其他研究。
哇。这个人做了一些研究。
那么生淀粉是什么样的呢？
未煮熟的淀粉。那会是什么？
例如，大多数人不喜欢煮米饭直到变软为止。
他们喜欢硬的一些，
直到熟了。仍然会有一些危险的粒子。
哇。所以那将是一个未煮熟的，只是米饭。
然后当得到那个淀粉，
那个未煮熟的淀粉，有什么危险？
那里发生了什么？
如果没有脂肪，并且经常吃很多，
那么我认为有在实验动物中看到的，过早痴呆症的风险。
哇。进入大脑。这只是一些东西开始扰乱大脑。
是的。被淀粉颗粒堵塞的动脉。
这动脉下游的一切都被剥夺了营养，很可能会死亡。
这一般都不好。看看有机糙米、意大利面可能很难吃，对吧？
是的。我认为意大利面和米饭之类的东西应该至少煮40分钟。
您能想象煮意大利面 40 分钟吗？会是口香糖。
不都是口香糖吗？那就对了。
但我想您可以吃一些有机的，铁玉米，然后发芽，
自己做或类似的东西，我猜。
对。
对生育酚维生素 E 与混合生育酚在毒性中的作用有何看法？
所以我们有生育酚维生素 E 与混合生育酚。
我会选择生育酚，
但在喂养实验中，如果生育三烯酚过多，
则会导致肝脏肿大。
这表明某种压力效应。
我从中国人那里看到这，是一个很好的。
干维生素 E 合法吗？
Dirk Pearson 和 Sandy Shaw 早在 1982 年就推荐过。
我记得那本书。
还记得吗？Pearson 和 Shaw 的书推动了维生素 E。
有这样的事情吗？
确实有一些维生素 E 的价值，
但没有干维生素 E。没有这样的东西。
有时以具有特殊抗癌效应的方式出售。
记得 Derrick 曾建议将 Estherton 揉进他的头皮，让他的头发长出来。
是的。
奏效了吗？
不，那没有用。
有什么想法吗？
为头发稀疏写封电子邮件。
似乎是在我的手腕上放了板子和螺丝后才开始的。
所以我猜这个人的手腕上放了一个盘子。会不会影响脱发？
会影响头发稀疏吗？
头发稀疏会不会影响脱发？
可以想象。但头皮和毛囊的生物活力对应。
例如，甲状腺功能低下的人往往会脱发，
而仅仅提高代谢率就会提高您生长和保留头发的能力。
因此，如果某些事情造成持续的压力，
那可能会减慢代谢并导致脱发。
有趣的。这么多年过去了，
您有没有看到任何关于为什么头发往往变白的高质量信息？为什么？
那是多年前当博伊斯曼，科罗拉多州，蒙大拿州过早的战斗速度。
在那些非常寒冷的城镇里，灰发的人似乎很高。
我认为皮肤的压力可能是一个因素。
还有辐射。
人不会拍牙科X光片。
耳鸣有时会在脸颊的圆形区域变白，
一系列重叠的圆圈表明辐射正在破坏氧化色素的能力。
铜既是呼吸催化剂，又是色素形成催化剂。
因此，如果缺乏铜，
头发往往会变白，
并且会出现代谢较低、可能发炎的组织。
您如何看待不时用纯铜容器喝水？觉得有价值吗？
是的。与铁相比，
获得足够的铜，
我认为对于吃太多肉或其他丰富食物的人来说，
这是一个保护因素，
将竞争并取代能量产生和色素形成所需的铜。
所以像瘦肉，肋眼和T骨这样的肉，
吃起来很有趣。
那有很多铁。
是的。与大多数人一样，
过多的磷酸盐、过多的色氨酸、其他兴奋性氨基酸、以及过多的血红素。
提供的一切都倾向于支持癌症的发展和退化过程。
哇。但我认为色氨酸导致昏昏欲睡的时间，您说呢？
但在肉中具有兴奋性或炎症性。
是的。
有三种酸与衰老、退化和炎症以及甲状腺功能丧失相关，
即精氨酸、胱氨酸和色氨酸。
哇。那么鸡肉，牛肉，猪肉，有什么区别吗？
是的，一点点。
红贻贝甜菜含有更多的铁。
所以鸡肉的铁含量对身体更轻松一些。
对于铁含量，无论如何。
那么一般的鱼呢？
我想我记得我一直是。。。。
他说一些最好的选择是扇贝。您喜欢扇贝吗？
好的选择。应该是第一吧 ，扇贝。螃蟹、 stalamari、 鱿鱼。
所有的甲壳类动物和软体动物都很好。虾？
是的。虾。相对于铁而言，铜含量较高。
我看到那种绿松石色的铜和龙虾之类的东西。
这就是您得到的。那里的铜比铁多。
有趣的。
在任何地方都吃更多鱼的人通常比一般肉食者的死亡率更低吗？
是的。我认为部分原因是铁含量较低。
而低脂鱼，我认为是最好的低脂鱼。
所以除了鲑鱼，让我们看看，
鲑鱼会是一种高脂肪的鱼，有很多欧三。
对。
您不是欧三的粉丝。
正确的。是的。另一端是虾和扇贝。
非常酷。再来一个问题，然后我们就放您走。
我一天吃太多盐了。
有时第二天早上我的手关节会因疼痛或弯曲而僵硬。
关于如何缓解的任何想法？
哇。为什么盐会对这个人的关节造成这种影响？雷皮博士？
盐太多。
当他们吃太多盐时，他们的关节往往会吱吱作响，手会疼痛。
我不知道。我想我从来没有听说过。
是的，我们从来没有听说过那个。
但是现在，再次，只是要知道，重复一遍，
如果我理解的话，
您最喜欢的是 PICC Morton 的 Picoline 和 Canning。
对。
不含碘。
对。非常纯净。很纯的东西。
好吧，我们今天早上在这里覆盖了很多领域。
感谢您提供有关整个淀粉和谷物的所有信息，
因为自从我们有这个家伙以来，
我们收到了很多电子邮件。
所以我认为他确实走在了正确的轨道上。
他说的是一般情况下，
只是商业谷物，
对很多人来说可能是个问题。
对。只是吃它们。
是的。没有做好充分的加工。
雷皮博士，谢谢。
您的时事通讯怎么样？
我们很快就会有一个新的吗？
我要写一些关于紧张的东西。
我大约每五年左右回到这个主题。
您会吗？
我已经研究了 20 或 30 年的一些事情现在才开始真正成为人们感兴趣的主题。
那太棒了。我们很期待，
雷皮博士，像往常一样，
能有您真是太荣幸了。
我们很乐意与您交谈。
您听起来很棒。
您的声音比电话里的要近得多。
照顾好您自己。
我们很感激。
好的。
好的。
谢谢您。